Glass transition temperature various rubbers

This new development in the microstructural architecture of polybutadiene has opened the door for the preparation of various block copolymers made from the same monomer. For example, one can use this concept to prepare various polybutadiene rubbers in which the chain segment contains various glass transition temperatures, depending on its microstructural arrangements. Similarly, manipulating the polymerization temperature using the same modifier and... 

Table 5.1 Glass-transition temperatures of various rubbers...

It is unfortunate that test methods for soft plastics and for rubbers, although very similar, are not identical, for example differences in tensile stress strain, tear and hardness methods. If they were aligned, much of debate about which method to use would be eliminated. For some properties, there is a distinct difference in approach. For example, glass transition temperature is frequently determined for plastics whilst various low temperature tests have been specifically developed for rubbers. 

Figure 2 shows tensile-yield strengths for blends of the crystalline EPDM with various levels of LDPE. The curve increases monotonically as expected if no phase inversion occurs. Since amorphous LDPE has a glass-transition temperature near that of EPDM (7) and since the LPDE has only 27 % crystallinity, one should not expect a rubber-to-rigid phase transition. 

For binders in particular - but also for plasticizers - it is important to know the glass transition temperature. The value of the glass transition temperature should be as low as possible but at least -50 °C. If the temperature of a polymer drops below Tg, it behaves in an increasingly brittle manner. As the temperature rises above Tg, the polymer becomes more rubber-like. Therefore, knowledge of Tg is essential in the selection of materials for various applications. In general, values of Tg well below room temperature correspond to elastomers and values above room temperature to rigid, structural polymers. 

Another explanation for an abnormal increase in Tgl in polymer blends has been proposed by Manabe, Murakami, and Takayanagi 125). They used a three-layered shell model, which accounts for interaction between the dispsersed and continuous phases of the blend. Abnormal increases in the glass transition of polystyrene in blends with various rubbers were explained by thermal stresses which arise from the difference in thermal expansion coefficients of the component polymers. However shifts in the glass transition temperatures of the SIN s do not appear to arise from differences in the expansion coefficients of the components because samples with the same overall composition and almost identical microstructures have significantly different glass transition temperatures. 

Poly(epichlorohydrin), CO rubber (Hydrin), was chosen for various reasons. The one reason was that CO has been shown to be miscible with PMMA by Anderson based upon differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) which showed only one glass transition temperature (T ) for the blend (9). Since T is very sensitive to the disruption of the local structure that results when two polymers are mixed, the existence of a single glass transition temperature is a good indicator of miscibility (10). 

FIGURE 9.17 Dependence of productivity and separation factor /3p C6H5CH3/H2O of membranes based on various rubbery polymers on the glass transition temperature of the polymer (pervaporation separation of saturated toluene/water mixture, T = 308 K) (1) polydimethyl siloxane (2) polybutadiene (3) polyoctylmethyl siloxane (4) nitrile butadiene rubber with 18% mol of nitrile groups (5) the same, 28% mol of nitrile groups (6) the same, 38% mol of nitrile groups (7) ethylene/propylene copolymer (8) polyepichlorohydrin (9) polychloroprene (10) pol3furethane (11) polyacrylate rubber (12) fluorocarbon elastomer. (From analysis of data presented in Semenova, S.I., J. Membr. Sci., 231, 189, 2004. With permission.)... 

Figure 2 shows the SVM images for the PS film collected at various temperatures from 200 to 400 K [23]. The surface modulus of the silicon substrate should be invariant with respect to temperature in the employed range, meaning that the contrast enhancement between the PS and Si surfaces with temperature reflects that the modulus of the PS surface starts to decrease. In the case of a lower temperature, the image contrast was trivial, as shown in the top row of Fig. 2. On the other hand, as the temperature went beyond 330 or 340 K, the contrast between the PS and Si surfaces became remarkable with increasing temperature. This makes it clear that the PS surface reached a glass-rubber transition state at around these temperatures. Here, it should be recalled that the T of the PS by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was 378 K. Therefore, it can be claimed that surface glass transition temperature (7 ) in the PS film is definitely lower than the corresponding T. ...

Figure 10-30. Thermal conductivity k of natural rubber (NR), poly(oxyethylene) (PEOX), and poly (ethylene) (PE) of various densities as a function of temperature. Tg is the glass transition temperature, Tm is the melting temperature. (From data of various authors in the compilation of W. Knappe.)...

Figure 10.34. Various kinds of concentration dependencies of the glass transition temperature for polymer-plasticizer systems. 1 - PVC-ethyl stearate, 2 - PVC-dibutyl phthalate, 3 - butadiene rubber SCD-trans-former oil, ° 4 - line connecting the points corresponding to the glass transition temperature of transformer oil and the point corresponding to the system 3 with the largest fraction of plasticizer.

Table 35-4. Glass Transition Temperatures and Solubility Parameters of Various Vulcanized Elastomers and Their Mixtures. 8, Solubility Parameter Br, Poly (butadiene) CR Poly(chloroprene) NBR, Poly(butadiene-co-acrylonitrile) NR, Natural Rubber ...

The main advantage of such triblock copolymers is that they can be moulded and recycled simply by heating the material above the glass transition temperature of polystyrene, unlike classical vulcanised rubbers, which cannot be reused without degradation as they are chemically cross-linked. Such SBS-based materials are called thermoplastic elastomers. However, for various reasons, including cost, the commercial use of such polymers is rather limited compared with the use of natural and classical synthetic rubbers. 

---