Genetically environmental impact

Animals may not be moved for 14 days after administration of the experimental product, and records on the disposition of trial animals must be retained for 2 years. Bio-security issues will be of particular concern to the environmental impact assessment where trials involve live organisms or genetically modified organisms, either in vaccine challenge studies or as experimental products. 

Bennet, R.M., R.H. Phipps, and A.M. Strange. 2006. The use of life cycle assessment to compare the environmental impact of production and feeding of conventional and genetically modified maize for broiler production in Argentina. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 15 71-82. 

A three-year project Impact of transgenic crop cultivation on the use of agrochemicals and the environment was recently initiated under the umbrella of lUPAC. Within this project, the environmental impact of altered pesticide usage patterns on genetically modified crops will be assessed. To this end, data on the actual use of pesticides on GM crops will be collected. Most of these data, which are available from literature and the Internet, pertain to the American and Canadian areas of cultivation. Where possible, data will also be collected that have been obtained in other nations where GM crops are grown. Other factors than GM crops that may have contributed to altered use of pesticides (e.g. new registrations) will be taken into account and their impact compared with that of GM crop adoption. 

And this is very relevant for the way we think about fetal development. The more complex the process that reads out genetic information stored in the genome, the more complex is the vulnerability of that process to environmental impact. 

Not quite. Autism in identical twins can be caused by a shared fetal environmental impact rather than by direct genetic transmission. The reality is that like mental retardation, autism is a behaviorally defined syndrome with a possibly wide variety of both genetic and nongenetic causes. The often-quoted concordance rate of 90 percent among identical twins is accurate for broad autism but not for severe (narrow) autism, for which twin concordance is only about 60 percent. Also in contrast to the ABC News report, the concordance among fraternal twins can be as high as 23 percent for broad autism.55... 

The 15 chapters of Honey Bees The Environmental Impact of Chemicals discuss these different subjects in depth. Besides presenting various tests and specific methodologies, a huge amount of ecotoxicological data, never previously published, is provided. Similarly, specific problems such as those related to the contamination of non-Apis bees, genetically modified plants, or regulatory constraints are addressed. 

Figure 9.14 Potential targets for wine yeast strain development. The primary role of wine yeast is to conduct the alcoholic fermentation during which grape sugars (mainly glucose and fructose) are converted into ethanol, carbon dioxide and other minor, but important, metabolites. The main emphasis in strain development programmes is on the development of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with improved fermentation, processing and biopreservation abilities, and the capacity to enhance the wholesomeness and sensory quality of wine. It is hoped that such genetically improved yeast strains could enhance cost-effective production of wine with minimised resource inputs, improved quality and low environmental impact. Adapted from Pretorius (2000).

A large part of the supply of nitrogen already comes from biological fixation of nitrogen from air and soil. Extensive research has been carried out for more than 20 years [5] to develop genetic varieties of basic crops that can fix nitrogen directly from the air, The successes are limited to a few species however, even in the case of success in this field, the testing of the environmental impacts and reproduction of the new species and their distribution worldwide may take considerable time. 

Class I products are deemed to have no new or unusual safety concerns, and are reviewed without special precautions. Class II products, however, involve the introduction of r-DNA constructions into live organisms and additional information is needed for full review. Issues include the competitiveness of the organism in the environment, its survivability and persistence, and whether it will transplant the wild-type organisms from the environment. The added genetic information must be well characterized, and the full nucleotide sequence may be requested. The fully documented identification of the entire insert from the foreign source is essential. Concerns for safety to humans and animals, and impact on the environment, must be addressed in an environmental assessment or environmental impact study to be evaluated by an ad hoc committee before live products can be considered for a limited field trial or licensing. 

Emerging food technologies such as these, however, are stiU surrounded hy a cloud of skepticism and debate. Many consumers and advocacy groups ai ue that the health safety risks and environmental impact of products such as genetically modified foods have... 

Salmon. To ensure that the gene remains active all year round, scientists added a switch from the ocean pout to the Atlantic salmon. This genetically engineered fish reduces the production cost of sahnon. AquaBounty Technologies, which developed the AquAdvanb e salmon applied to the FDA for permission to market the fish. In September, 2010, the FDA concluded that the fish was safe to eat but felt that more scientific research was needed, particularly on the possible environmental impact of the modified salmon. 

---