Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Generic data base prediction

Although such predictive techniques would be generally welcomed by regulators, industrial scientists, and academicians, the contradictory nature of some of the material in these three chapters reflects the current status of such research, i.e., the final answer on predictive techniques and a generic data base is not in yet. Much discusrion is needed before moving from these first generation data bases to a common, functional, well-received second generation data base. [Pg.536]

METEOR S biotransformation rules are generic reaction descriptors, and the versatile structural representation used in the system allows each atom or bond to have specific physicochemical properties. This approach provides more details than simple hard-coded functional group descriptors (313), but this flexibility also can give rise to an avalanche of data. METEOR manages the amount of data by predicting which metabolites are to be formed rather than all the possible outcomes (310,312,314,315). At high certainty levels, when chosen, only the more likely biotransformations are requested. At lower likelihood levels, the more common metabolites are also selected for examination. Currently, METEOR knowledge-based biotransformations are exclusively for mammalian biotransformations (phase I and phase II) (314,315). [Pg.494]

These factors can hardly be eliminated in a large generic data set of heterogeneous protein-ligand complexes. Based on these fundamental problems, it is likely that for such data sets average prediction errors significantly belo v 1.0 pK units may be very difficult if not impossible to achieve. Evaluation of the SFCscore functions has sho vn that the development of empirical functions appears to converge to this limit vith respect to the prediction error. [Pg.195]

There are many more exposure studies done in private industry and by government agencies than the number available In the published literature. It Is the data In these studies which offers the best hope for constructing a viable data base for predicting mlxer-loader/applicator exposures. The benefits are clear In cost and time savings. There Is a limit In any society to the amount of resources that can be spent on risk assessment. It would be far better to Jointly apply those resources to areas where data Is Inadequate or where the data will provide more usable information for risk assessment. Mlxer-loader/applicator data offers a special opportunity to test this premise because It can be reported and used on a generic basis which would Improve the quality of risk assessments while at the same time minimize the potential loss of proprietary Information and cost to companies. [Pg.350]

Finally, the MOS should also take into account the uncertainties in the estimated exposure. For predicted exposure estimates, this requires an uncertainty analysis (Section 8.2.3) involving the determination of the uncertainty in the model output value, based on the collective uncertainty of the model input parameters. General sources of variability and uncertainty in exposure assessments are measurement errors, sampling errors, variability in natural systems and human behavior, limitations in model description, limitations in generic or indirect data, and professional judgment. [Pg.348]

Overall, this study indicated that generic simulation of pharmacokinetics at the lead optimization stage could be useful to predict differences in pharmacokinetic parameters of threefold or more based upon minimal measured input data. Fine discrimination of pharmacokinetics (less than twofold) should not be expected due to the uncertainty in the input data at the early stages. It is also apparent that verification of simulations with in vivo data for a few compounds of each new compound class was required to allow an assessment of the error in prediction and to identify invalid model assumptions. [Pg.233]

We report here on the distributions of several chlorobiphenyls In samples of water, sediment and biota of the Acushnet River Estuary - New Bedford Harbor, Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts, U.S.A. Our general objective Is to gain Information of generic utility In addition to providing specific data and Interpretations of assistance to remedial action at this Superfund site. Our specific objectives In this paper are to 1) document the composition of Individual chlorobiphenyls In biota normally harvested by commercial and recreational fishermen and discuss factors which could lead to the observed distributions and potential Implications for public health standards for PCBs In fish and 11) to Investigate, In a preliminary manner, the adherence of bloconcentratlon of PCBs to predictions based on equilibrium assumptions and octanol/water (Kg ) partition coefficients (, 22). [Pg.175]

Parts count reliability prediction. The MIL-HDBK-217 Parts Count Reliability Prediction is normally used when accurate design data and component specifications are not determined. Typically, this occurs in the proposal and bid process or early in the design process. Minimal information is required for a Parts Count Rehability Prediction. The formula for a parts count analysis is the sum of the base failure rate of all components in the system. MIL-HDBK-217 provides tables for the same component groups in the Parts Stress Analysis, listing generic failure rates and quality factors for different environments. The predicted failure rate results will normally be harsher than those of the Part Stress Analysis approach. [Pg.328]

However, one must beware that RPD depends on the range used for Y and, for example, so-called local regression models based on a sub-range of Y due to non-linearity in the data cannot directly be compared to a global model. In this respect RMSE is a more generic error measure. Similarly, this is why does not necessarily give a good indication about a model s prediction ability. [Pg.171]


See other pages where Generic data base prediction is mentioned: [Pg.330]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.607]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.2319]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.800]    [Pg.490]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.1374]    [Pg.608]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.747]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.1471]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.865]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.1439]   


SEARCH



Data bases

© 2024 chempedia.info