Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Equilibrium assumptions

The quasi-equilibrium assumption in the above canonical fonn of the transition state theory usually gives an upper bound to the real rate constant. This is sometimes corrected for by multiplying (A3.4.98) and (A3.4.99) with a transmission coefifiwient 0 < k < 1. [Pg.780]

Now the equilibrium assumption is applied to Scheme XVI. From the above considerations, Cc = KcaPb, which, combined with Eq. (3-131), gives... [Pg.97]

For Scheme XIV, and for each of the following sets of rate constants, calculate the exact relative concentration cb/ca as a function of time. Also, for each set, calculate the approximate values of cb/ca using both the equilibrium assumption and the steady-state approximation. [Pg.130]

Let us examine the equilibrium assumption of transition state theory. Consider a reversible elementary reaction at equilibrium. Because the initial and final states are at equilibrium, assuredly the transition state is in equilibrium with each of these. (It follows that for a reaction at equilibrium, transition state theory is exact insofar as the equilibrium assumption is concerned.)... [Pg.201]

Now suppose that, from this equilibrium situation, the final state is instantaneously removed. The production of transition state species by the product state will cease. However, the production of transition state species by the reactant state is unaffected by this suppression of the final state, and, according to the third postulate of the theory, the rate of reaction is a function of the transition state concentration formed from the reactant state. This is the usual argument for the equilibrium assumption. Despite its apparent artificiality, the equilibrium assumption is generally considered to be fairly sound, with the possible exception of its application to very fast reactions. ... [Pg.201]

Here Z represents the reaction products. M is the transition state the double dagger symbol will always signify a quantity or structure relating to the transition state. Scheme I incorporates the equilibrium assumption by writing the conversion of the initial state into the transition state as an equilibrium. This assumption then allows us to apply statistical mechanics to the rate problem making use of Eq. (5-32), we have... [Pg.205]

A first-order rate constant has the dimension time, but all other rate constants include a concentration unit. It follows that a change of concentration scale results in a change in the magnitude of such a rate constant. From the equilibrium assumption of transition state theory we developed these equations in Chapter 5 ... [Pg.253]

The extension to rates draws on the equilibrium assumption of transition state theory to yield the analogous result, with rate constants replacing the equilibrium constants of Eq. (6-96). Kresge has generalized this argument, the result being... [Pg.302]

Step 1. Assume the composition of the liquid in the evaporator at equilibrium with its vapor to be 75 mol% propane and 25 mol% butane. This is the initial assumption. If it is correct, the composition of the initial charge can be checked. If it is not correct, the problem must be reworked with a new equilibrium assumption. The composition of the vapor in equilibrium with this liquid is determined from the following equation. [Pg.333]

Enzyme reaction kinetics were modelled on the basis of rapid equilibrium assumption. Rapid equilibrium condition (also known as quasi-equilibrium) assumes that only the early components of the reaction are at equilibrium.8-10 In rapid equilibrium conditions, the enzyme (E), substrate (S) and enzyme-substrate (ES), the central complex equilibrate rapidly compared with the dissociation rate of ES into E and product (P ). The combined inhibition effects by 2-ethoxyethanol as a non-competitive inhibitor and (S)-ibuprofen ester as an uncompetitive inhibition resulted in an overall mechanism, shown in Figure 5.20. [Pg.135]

Derivation of Enzymatic Rate Equation from Rapid Equilibrium Assumption... [Pg.135]

It is also possible to derive a rate equation for a reaction sequence which does not differ essentially from that which led to (16) without introducing the equilibrium assumption (12)36. For convenience the mechanism is now rewritten as... [Pg.418]

Note how the partition function for the transition state vanishes as a result of the equilibrium assumption and that the equilibrium constant is determined, as it should be, by the initial and final states only. This result will prove to be useful when we consider more complex reactions. If several steps are in equilibrium, and we express the overall rate in terms of partition functions, many terms cancel. However, if there is no equilibrium, we can use the above approach to estimate the rate, provided we have sufficient knowledge of the energy levels in the activated complex to determine the relevant partition functions. [Pg.123]

Equations (2.10) and (2.12) are identical except for the substitution of the equilibrium dissociation constant Ks in Equation (2.10) by the kinetic constant Ku in Equation (2.12). This substitution is necessary because in the steady state treatment, rapid equilibrium assumptions no longer holds. A detailed description of the meaning of Ku, in terms of specific rate constants can be found in the texts by Copeland (2000) and Fersht (1999) and elsewhere. For our purposes it suffices to say that while Ku is not a true equilibrium constant, it can nevertheless be viewed as a measure of the relative affinity of the ES encounter complex under steady state conditions. Thus in all of the equations presented in this chapter we must substitute Ku for Ks when dealing with steady state measurements of enzyme reactions. [Pg.37]

Successful lead optimization can drive the affinity of inhibitors for their target enzymes so high that the equilibrium assumptions used to derive the equations for calculating enzyme-inhibitor K, values no longer hold. [Pg.178]

The standard wall function is of limited applicability, being restricted to cases of near-wall turbulence in local equilibrium. Especially the constant shear stress and the local equilibrium assumptions restrict the universality of the standard wall functions. The local equilibrium assumption states that the turbulence kinetic energy production and dissipation are equal in the wall-bounded control volumes. In cases where there is a strong pressure gradient near the wall (increased shear stress) or the flow does not satisfy the local equilibrium condition an alternate model, the nonequilibrium model, is recommended (Kim and Choudhury, 1995). In the nonequilibrium wall function the heat transfer procedure remains exactly the same, but the mean velocity is made more sensitive to pressure gradient effects. [Pg.323]

Valocchi, A.J., 1985, Validity of the local equilibrium assumption for modeling sorbing solute transport through homogeneous soils. Water Resources Research 21, 808-820. [Pg.532]

Parametric sensitivity analysis showed that for nonreactive systems, the adsorption equilibrium assumption can be safely invoked for transient CO adsorption and desorption, and that intrapellet diffusion resistances have a strong influence on the time scale of the transients (they tend to slow down the responses). The latter observation has important implications in the analysis of transient adsorption and desorption over supported catalysts that is, the results of transient chemisorption studies should be viewed with caution, if the effects of intrapellet diffusion resistances are not properly accounted for. [Pg.99]

For fast equilibrium chemistry (Section 5.4), an equilibrium assumption allowed us to write the concentration of all chemical species in terms of the mixture-fraction vector c(x, t) = ceq( (x, 0). For a turbulent flow, it is important to note that the local micromixing rate (i.e., the instantaneous scalar dissipation rate) is a random variable. Thus, while the chemistry may be fast relative to the mean micromixing rate, at some points in a turbulent flow the instantaneous micromixing rate may be fast compared with the chemistry. This is made all the more important by the fact that fast reactions often take place in thin reaction-diffusion zones whose size may be smaller than the Kolmogorov scale. Hence, the local strain rate (micromixing rate) seen by the reaction surface may be as high as the local Kolmogorov-scale strain rate. [Pg.220]

Using the rapid equilibrium assumption between the inhibitor and the enzyme, the expressions for the complexes are given as... [Pg.139]

Comparing with Eq. (44) and using the rapid equilibrium assumption with dissociation constants K, the total enzyme concentration can be written as... [Pg.186]

If equilibrium assumptions hold, the ratio of recorded ion intensities is equal to the ratio of the equilibrium concentrations of the cluster ions,... [Pg.42]

In general, this raises the question whether the sorption equilibrium assumption in fate and effects models is invalid when the fate/transport process of interest occurs over comparable or shorter time scales than sorption. The equilib-... [Pg.212]

Equation 14.11 explicitly contains the equilibrium assumption of transition state theory, i.e. that the transition state and the excited molecules are in chemical equilibrium. [Pg.429]

Using the equilibrium assumption of transition state theory the ratio of concentra-... [Pg.433]

As will be discussed in the following chapter, most combustion systems entail oxidation mechanisms with numerous individual reaction steps. Under certain circumstances a group of reactions will proceed rapidly and reach a quasi-equilibrium state. Concurrently, one or more reactions may proceed slowly. If the rate or rate constant of this slow reaction is to be determined and if the reaction contains a species difficult to measure, it is possible through a partial equilibrium assumption to express the unknown concentrations in terms of other measurable quantities. Thus, the partial equilibrium assumption is very much like the steady-state approximation discussed earlier. The difference is that in the steady-state approximation one is concerned with a particular species and in the partial equilibrium assumption one is concerned with particular reactions. Essentially then, partial equilibrium comes about when forward and backward rates are very large and the contribution that a particular species makes to a given slow reaction of concern can be compensated for by very small differences in the forward and backward rates of those reactions in partial equilibrium. [Pg.60]

A specific example can illustrate the use of the partial equilibrium assumption. Consider, for instance, a complex reacting hydrocarbon in an oxidizing medium. By the measurement of the CO and C02 concentrations, one wants to obtain an estimate of the rate constant of the reaction... [Pg.60]

Thus, one observes that the rate expression can be written in terms of readily measurable stable species. One must, however, exercise care in applying this assumption. Equilibria do not always exist among the II2 02 reactions in a hydrocarbon combustion system—indeed, there is a question if equilibrium exists during CO oxidation in a hydrocarbon system. Nevertheless, it is interesting to note the availability of experimental evidence that shows the rate of formation of C02 to be (l/4)-order with respect to 02, (l/2)-order with respect to water, and first-order with respect to CO [17,18], The partial equilibrium assumption is more appropriately applied to NO formation in flames, as will be discussed in Chapter 8. [Pg.61]

If one invokes the steady-state approximation described in Chapter 2 for the N atom concentration and makes the partial equilibrium assumption also described in Chapter 2 for the reaction system... [Pg.421]

In order for an equilibrium to exist between E -E S and ES, the rate constant kp would have to be much smaller than k i However, for the majority of enzyme activities, this assumption is unlikely to hold true. Nevertheless, the rapid equilibrium approach remains a most useful tool since equations thereby derived often have the same form as those derived by more correct steady-state approaches (see later), and although steady-state analyses of very complex systems (such as those displaying cooperative behavior) are almost impossibly complicated, rapid equilibrium assumptions facilitate relatively straightforward derivations of equations in such cases. [Pg.111]


See other pages where Equilibrium assumptions is mentioned: [Pg.2115]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.595]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.96 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.25 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.189 , Pg.209 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.27 ]




SEARCH



Equilibrium assumption, local

Equilibrium calculations simplifying assumptions

Equilibrium model assumptions

Michaelis-Menten equation using the rapid-equilibrium assumption

Michaelis-Menten equation, derivation rapid equilibrium assumption

Near equilibrium assumption

Nonequilibrium thermodynamics local equilibrium assumption

Partial equilibrium assumption

Quasi-equilibrium assumption

Quasi-equilibrium assumption, validity

Rapid equilibrium assumption

Rapid equilibrium assumption rate constant

Rotational effects equilibrium assumption

Rotational equilibrium assumption

The Local Equilibrium Assumption

The Reaction Equilibrium Assumption

The equilibrium assumption

The partial equilibrium assumption

© 2024 chempedia.info