Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

General properties of nuclei

Here av — 15.5 MeV represents a constant term in B.E. per nucleon, as — 16.8 MeV provides a surface term allowing for a reduced contribution to B.E. from [Pg.17]

Some simple models for V(r) are shown in Fig. 2.1. Two crude approximations, the infinite square well (ISW) and the 3-dimensional harmonic oscillator (3DHO), have the advantage of leading to analytical solutions of the Schrodinger equation which lead to the following energy levels  [Pg.18]

These shell closures have a profound influence on nuclear properties, in particular the binding energy (adding terms not accounted for in Eq. 2.2), particle separation energies and neutron capture cross-sections. The shell model also forms a basis for predicting the properties of nuclear energy levels, especially the ground [Pg.20]

In the case of odd-A nuclei, In in the ground state is fixed by the single valency nucleon in the lowest vacant level shown in Fig. 2.3. In 150, for example, 8 protons fill closed shells up to 1 py2, 6 neutrons fill closed shells up to 1 /tv2 and the last neutron occupies py2 making the state. In 170, on the other hand, all states up to I/21/2 are filled by both protons and neutrons and the extra neutron occupies [Pg.21]


The general properties of nuclei are presented in two sections (Nos. 1-2) of Table 2. Data on the charged particle reactions yields and cross sections da/dfl, a, etc., see Nos. 3-4 of Table 2) and spectroscopic factors (S n, see No. 5) derived from the experimental data on cross sections of transfer reactions are given after E and are followed by the main reference. [Pg.31]

As we have shown in Chapters 2 and 3, under the normal operating conditions of STM, the tunneling current can be calculated from the wavefunctions a few A from the outermost nuclei of the tip and the sample. The wavefunctions at the surfaces of solids, rather than the wavefunctions in the bulk, contribute to the tunneling current. In this chapter, we will discuss the general properties of the wavefunctions at surfaces. This is to fill the gap between standard solid-state physics textbooks such as Kittel (1986) and Ashcroft and Mermin (1985), which have too little information, and monographs as well as journal articles, which are too much to read. For more details, the book of Zangwill (1988) is helpful. [Pg.91]

It has been pointed out that the central ( 2, transition does not experience any first-order quadrupole interaction. The absence of first-order broadening effects is a general property of symmetric (m, - m) transitions. There are cases where this can be a distinct advantage, the most direct instance being for integer spin nuclei (e.g. D and both 1=1) where there is no ( /2, — /2) transition. The main problem is to excite and detect such higher-order transitions, for which there are two separate approaches. The sample may either be irradiated and detected at the multiple quantum frequency (called overtone spectroscopy) or the MQ transition can be excited and a 2D sequence used to detect the effect on the observable magnetisation. [Pg.77]

The first supershell node occurs at iV as 850), Calculations by Nishioka et al. [17], using a nonselfconsistent Woods-Saxon potential (instead of the spherical jellium model) give N 1000. This node has been observed, although the experiments also show some internal discrepancies the first node is located at IV 1000 in Ref. [15] while it is at iV 800 in [16]. The experimental discovery of supershells confirms the predictions of nuclear physicists. However, supershelis have not been observed in nuclei due to an insufficient number of particles. In summary, the existence of supershelis is a rather general property of a system form by a large number of identical fermions in a confining potential. [Pg.129]

In this section three methods will be outlined which have been used to study the properties of nuclei in coordination compounds. None of the techniques is of universal application and they all suffer from the disadvantage that the connection between the spectra obtained and the molecular bonding is seldom simple so that in this application they are generally best used to compare two compounds rather than discuss either in isolation. However, the spectra can be outstandingly useful in obtaining details of molecular geometry and reactions. [Pg.281]

The lanthanide ion serves as a probe of its environment in the host crystal, providing information on the site symmetry, and on the crystalline electric field (CEF) components and the CEF levels of the ion. In addition, the hyperfine interaction with the lanthanide nucleus or with the nuclei of other atoms (transferred hyperfine interaction) provides information on the electronic wave functions of both lanthanide and non-lanthanide ions. Unlike NMR and the Mossbauer effect which utilize the invariant electric and magnetic moment properties of nuclei as probes, these properties of magnetic ions are in general not invariant, but are themselves conditioned by the ionic environment. In the case of the lanthanides however, since these properties reside in the incomplete 4f shell, which is relatively well screened from the ionic environment by the filled 5s and 5p shells, they are not so strongly affected as in the case of the magnetic 3d ions, for example. [Pg.474]

The defining characteristic of an atom of a chemical element is the number of protons in its nucleus. A given element may have different isotopes, which are nuclei with the same numbers of protons but different numbers of neutrons. For example, 12C and 14C are two isotopes of carbon. The nuclei of both isotopes contain six protons. However, 12C has six neutrons, whereas 14C has eight neutrons. In general, it is the number of protons and electrons that determines chemical properties of an element. Thus, the different isotopes of an element are usually chemically indistinguishable. These isotopes, however, have different masses. [Pg.197]

Proton NMR has the advantage of relative experimental ease due mainly to its intrinsic high sensitivity, though the relaxation properties of the proton resonances are generally more difficult to interpret in terms of dynamics than are those from protonated carbon nuclei. The widths of the proton resonances can conveniently be used as a qualitative measure of some of the motional properties. [Pg.503]

Relativistic mean field (RMF) models have been applied successfully to describe properties of rinite nuclei. In general ground state energies, spin-orbit splittings, etc. can be described well in terms of a few parameters ref. [18]. Recently it has lead to the suggestion that the bulk SE is strongly correlated with the neutron skin [19, 20] (see below). In essence the method is based upon the use of energy-density functional (EDF) theory. [Pg.101]

The absorbing property of a nucleus is affected by the magnetic effects of adjacent nuclei. This results in what is known as spin-spin splitting of the initial resonance peak. In general, if there are n adjacent similar nuclei, the peak will be split into n + 1 components and this can give information about the manner in which the nuclei are arranged in the molecule. [Pg.89]

Where are the nuclei . This is nob just a question of equilibrium shape as measured by n.m.r./ x-ray or neutron spectroscopy/ but also concerns what possible shapes the molecule can asscune as it interacts with its partner in general/ what flexibility it possesses. Flexibility is clearly a property of both small molecules and the protein binding sites. [Pg.174]

A correlation analysis is a powerful tool used widely in various fields of theoretical and experimental chemistry. Generally, such an analysis, based on a statistically representative mass of data, can lead to reliable relationships that allow us to predict or to estimate important characteristics of still unknown molecular systems or systems unstable for direct experimental measurements. First, this statement concerns structural, thermodynamic, kinetic, and spectroscopic properties. For example, despite the very complex nature of chemical screening in NMR, particularly for heavy nuclei, various incremental schemes accurately predict their chemical shifts, thus providing a structural analysis of new molecular systems. Relationships for the prediction of physical or chemical properties of compounds or even their physiological activity are also well known. [Pg.167]


See other pages where General properties of nuclei is mentioned: [Pg.17]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.2389]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.579]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.1876]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.687]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.127]   


SEARCH



Nucleus properties

© 2024 chempedia.info