Fundamental units, choice

Fryer, P.J. 210,229 Fuller, E. N. 584,655 Fully developed flow 61.681 Fundamental units, choice of 12 Further reading, flow and pressure measurement (Chapter 6) 272... 

First, it is well known in physics that the choice of fundamental units one chooses for one s model is arbitrary. While most often mass, length, time, and charge are used, a perfectly valid model can be generated using only a single fundamental unit. 

We must now find a scale factor with length dimensions that can be used to reduce plate height to dimensionless form. In Section 11.5 we identified particle diameter dp as a fundamental unit of length to which most distances in the column are scaled. Scaling H in units of dp seems, then, a logical choice. This choice is supported by noting that when v equals the fundamental velocity vc, all mobile phase H terms are close to dp in value. Thus when v = vc, Cmv becomes Cmvc, which equals... 

Extraction, a unit operation, is a complex and rapidly developing subject area (1,2). The chemistry of extraction and extractants has been comprehensively described (3,4). The main advantage of solvent extraction as an industrial process Hes in its versatiHty because of the enormous potential choice of solvents and extractants. The industrial appHcation of solvent extraction, including equipment design and operation, is a subject in itself (5). The fundamentals and technology of metal extraction processes have been described (6,7), as has the role of solvent extraction in relation to the overall development and feasibiHty of processes (8). The control of extraction columns has also been discussed (9). 

A note on good practice We use SI units throughout R is in its fundamental SI form and the molar mass is in SI base units to be consistent with the choice for R. The cancellation of the units has made use of the relation 1 J = 1 kg-ur-s 2. 

All physical quantities are measured in appropriate units. These units can be divided into two categories fundamental or primary units and derived or secondary units. The latter can be expressed in terms of the former. The choice of primary units is based largely on convenience and may be quite arbitrary commonly used primary units include those pertaining to length, mass, time and temperature. 

Research had helped Du Pont convert from explosives to consumer goods. The company opened the first modern research laboratory in the American chemical industry in 1902. By 1921, the United States had more than 500 industrial research laboratories eager to duplicate goods previously imported from Germany. Most American industrial laboratories applied known scientific facts to practical problems, however. Thus, Du Pont s offer to Carothers embodied the first attempt by an American chemical manufacturer to discover new fundamental scientific explanations for natural phenomena. If Carothers was willing to work for industry, Du Pont was an attractive choice. 

Here r, 9, 4> are dimensionless co-moving coordinates attached to fundamental observers and R(t) a scale factor with a dimension of length depending only on cosmic time t. k is the curvature constant, which with suitable choice of units takes one of the three values +1 (closed world model with positive curvature), 0 (flat, open model) or —1 (open model with negative curvature). Some consequences of Eq. (4.7) are the relation between redshift and scale factor Eq. (4.2) and the variation of temperature... 

Because its base units directly underlie the quantum theory of electrons (i.e., the mass, charge, and angular momentum of the electron itself), the atomic units naturally simplify the fundamental Schrodinger equation for electronic interactions. (Indeed, with the choice me = e = h = 1, the Schrodinger equation reduces to pure numbers, and the solutions of this equation can be determined, once and for all, in a mathematical form that is independent of any subsequent re-measurement of e, me, and h in chosen practical units.) In contrast, textbooks commonly employ the Systeme International d Unites (SI), whose base units were originally chosen without reference to atomic phenomena ... 

An informative example of such unit-dependent representation of basic relationships is provided by electrical phenomena. Arguably, the most fundamental equation of the electrical sciences is Coulomb s law for the interaction energy (Veiec) of charges qu q2 at distance R. As recognized by Gibbs, each choice of unit system leads to a different expressions for Coulomb s law, all containing the basic physical ratio q q2/R but differing by a unit-dependent constant factor Kunits ... 

The pattern points associated with a particular lattice are referred to as the basis so that the description of a crystal pattern requires the specification of the space lattice by ai a2 a3 and the specification of the basis by giving the location of the pattern points in one unit cell by K, i= 1,2,. .., (Figure 16.1(b), (c)). The choice of the fundamental translations is a matter of convenience. For example, in a face-centred cubic fee) lattice we could choose orthogonal fundamental translation vectors along OX, OY, OZ, in which case the unit cell contains (Vg)8 + (l/2)6 = 4 lattice points (Figure 16.2(a)). Alternatively, we might choose a primitive unit cell with the fundamental translations... 

Here the number 1 reappears, so another recycle loop has been found. This loop includes all the operations in this list. Note that the first loop, unit 10, is nested within this new loop. All the listed operations can now be combined into one new unit, label it 11. At operation 8, stream S14 was followed, it returned to operation 1 if stream S15 had been followed instead, operation 9 would have been transferred to the calculation list-the same result as obtained later. The choice of which output to follow first has no fundamental effect on the result except to perhaps change the calculation sequence. Continue following the outputs (there is only one from unit 11, 515) and listing the operations encountered ... 

Although chemistry is usually developed in terms of mole units, we use mass units in most cases, the choice is a matter of taste, but there are some issues that are best dealt with in mass units. So the fundamental component property is their mass w/, say, the vector m. Let I be the A7-dimensional vector, all components of which are unity. Then the total mass of our system is , and this is constant in a closed system, even when, due to chemical reactions, the individual masses m, are not constant. 

Currently, metal-polypyridine units are the molecular building blocks of choice whenever a compound with special electro- and/or photo-activity is to be designed. The research emphasis has somewhat shifted from fundamental studies of electron transfer reactivity and excited state properties of individual complexes to the design of new functional molecules and supermolecules with predetermined properties. 

State functions derivable therefrom (such as ASd or AHd) are the fundamental quantities of interest, the arbitrariness of K or Kq causes no difficulty other than being a nuisance. It should be remembered that, once a choice of units and of standard state has been made, a value of /C or 1 implies that AG is a large negative quantity, and hence, that AGd is also likely to be large and negative. Thus, equilibrium will be established after the pertinent reaction has proceeded nearly to completion in the direction as written. Conversely, for values of K, or Kq equilibrium sets in when the reaction is close to completion in the opposite direction. Thus, the equilibrium constant serves as an index of how far and in what direction a reaction will proceed, and this prediction does not depend on the arbitrariness discussed earlier. It should be clear that the equilibrium constants do not in themselves possess the same fundamental importance as the differential Gibbs free energies. However, the full utility of equilibrium constants will not become clear until some illustrative examples are provided below. 

Consequently, the terms basic density and basic specific gravity give the same information, and they are different only in the fundamental sense that basic specific gravity is a pure number and basic density is not. The choice of one term over the other for descriptions of wood quality is a matter of preference and varies with particular authors or investigators. However, the assignment of units to these terms is appropriate only for basic density. 

---