Transfer function feedback

H(s) is the feedback transfer function, and we can see this goes to a summing block (or node) — represented by the circle with an enclosed summation sign. 

We are now in a position to start tying all the loose ends together For each of the three topologies, we now know both the forward transfer function G(s) (control-to-output) and also the feedback transfer function H(s). Going back to the basic equation for the closed-loop transfer function,... 

Hence the closed-loop control system for steady state conditions may be described by the forward transfer function of (2.52), using the positive root, and the feedback transfer function of... 

Considering the feedback mechanisms as converting an input signal SNjNo into an output p/, the feedback transfer function is defined by... 

The most important feature of a feedback is that, provided the system remains stable and the amount of feedback is sufficient, the output function /fdev(transfer function//sens ([Pg.952]

Feedback control systems have the property that as long as the loop gain is sufficiently high (and the system is stable), the transfer function of the system is the inverse of the feedback transfer function (Phillips and Harbor 1991). In the case of an inertial sensor, this means that the transfer function is determined by electronic components in the feedback network not the physical characteristics of the pendulum. Furthermore this same feedback holds the proof mass substantially at rest with respect to the frame of the sensor, greatly reducing the impact of nonlinearities in the suspension and transducers. 

If the forward transfer function and feedback transfer function of the system are represented by G(s) and H(s) respectively, then the closed loop transfer function is expressed by... 

The fuel channel thermal-hydraulics model and the chaimel inlet orifice model are used in the thermal-hydraulic stability analyses. The axial power distribution is taken as a cosine distribution. The power generation in the fuel is assumed to be constant and only flow feedback is considered. The block diagram for thermal-hydraulic stability is shown in Fig. 5.27 [10, 11]. The forward transfer function is evaluated from the chaimel inlet orifice model. The feedback transfer function is... 

The average power channel is analyzed to study coupled neutronic thermal-hydraulic stability of the Super LWR. A block diagram is shown in Fig. 5.45 [10, 13]. The neutronic model is used to find the forward transfer function G s), i.e., the transfer function from the reactivity perturbations to the power perturbations. The thermal-hydraulic, heat transfer, and excore models are used to determine the feedback transfer function H s) which is the transfer function from the power perturbations to the feedback reactivity perturbations through the neutronic effect. 

Figure 8-41 includes two conventional feedback controllers G i controls Cl by manipulating Mi, and G o controls C9 by manipidating Mo. The output sign s from the feedback controllers serve as input signals to the two decouplers D o and D91. The block diagram is in a simplified form because the load variables and transfer functions for the final control elements and sensors have been omitted. 

Fig. 4.1 Block diagram of a closed-loop control system. R s) = Laplace transform of reference input r(t) C(s) = Laplace transform of controlled output c(t) B s) = Primary feedback signal, of value H(s)C(s) E s) = Actuating or error signal, of value R s) - B s), G s) = Product of all transfer functions along the forward path H s) = Product of all transfer functions along the feedback path G s)H s) = Open-loop transfer function = summing point symbol, used to denote algebraic summation = Signal take-off point Direction of information flow.

A control system may have several feedback control loops. For example, with a ship autopilot, the rudder-angle control loop is termed the minor loop, whereas the heading control loop is referred to as the major loop. When analysing multiple loop systems, the minor loops are considered first, until the system is reduced to a single overall closed-loop transfer function. 

Note that in Figure 4.12 there is a positive feedback loop. Flence the closed-loop transfer function relating and C (.v) is... 

The closed-loop transfer function for any feedback control system may be written in the factored form given in equation (5.41)... 

A unity feedback computer control system, has an open-loop pulse transfer function... 

A unity feedback continuous control system has a forward-path transfer function... 

Since H =, the system has unity feedback, and the closed-loop transfer function and step response is given by... 

In this example, the inner loop is solved first using feedback. The controller and integrator are cascaded together (numpl, denpl) and then series is used to find the forward-path transfer function (numfp, denfp ). Feedback is then used again to obtain the closed-loop transfer function. 

Figure 2.12. (a) Simple negative feedback loop, and (b) its reduced single closed-loop transfer function form. 

The important observation is that when we "close" a negative feedback loop, the numerator is consisted of the product of all the transfer functions along the forward path. The denominator is 1 plus the product of all the transfer functions in the entire feedback loop ( .e., both forward and feedback paths). The denominator is also the characteristic polynomial of the closed-loop system. If we have positive feedback, the sign in the denominator is minus. 

Example 2.15. Derive the closed-loop transfer function C/R for the system with three overlapping negative feedback loops in Fig. E2.15(a). 

The limitation of transfer function representation becomes plain obvious as we tackle more complex problems. For complex systems with multiple inputs and outputs, transfer function matrices can become very clumsy. In the so-called modem control, the method of choice is state space or state variables in time domain—essentially a matrix representation of the model equations. The formulation allows us to make use of theories in linear algebra and differential equations. It is always a mistake to tackle modem control without a firm background in these mathematical topics. For this reason, we will not overreach by doing both the mathematical background and the control together. Without a formal mathematical framework, we will put the explanation in examples as much as possible. The actual state space control has to be delayed until after tackling classical transfer function feedback systems. 

Another strategy is to implement the PI algorithm in the so-called reset feedback configuration. The basis of internal reset feedback is to rearrange and implement the PI transfer function as... 

In our examples, we will take Gm = Ga = 1, and use a servo system with L = 0 to highlight the basic ideas. The algebra tends to be more tractable in this simplified unity feedback system with only Gc and Gp (Fig. 5.6), and the closed-loop transfer function is... 

In Eq. (10-5), 1/Gp is the set point tracking controller. This is what we need if we install only a feedforward controller, which in reality, we seldom do.4 Under most circumstances, the change in set point is handled by a feedback control loop, and we only need to implement the second term of (10-5). The transfer function -GL/Gp is the feedforward controller (or the disturbance rejection... 

Our next task is to find the closed-loop transfer functions of this feedforward-feedback system. Among other methods, we should see that we can "move" the G vGp term as shown in Fig. 

Of the other two load variables, we choose the process stream flow rate as the major disturbance. The flow transducer sends the signal to the feedforward controller (FFC, transfer function GFF). A summer (X) combines the signals from both the feedforward and the feedback... 

Consider the simpler problem in Fig. R10.5 based on Fig. 10.12. If we only implement one feedback loop and one controller, how is the transfer function Cj/M,... 

Synthesize a closed-loop transfer function with feedback ()... 

It can be synthesized with the MATLAB function feedback (). As an illustration, we will use a simple first order function for Gp and Gm, and a PI controller for Gc. When all is done, we test the dynamic response with a unit step change in the reference. To make the reading easier, we break the task up into steps. Generally, we would put the transfer function statements inside an M-file and define the values of the gains and time constants outside in the workspace. 

When we have a really simple problem, we should not even need to use feedback (). Yes, we can derive the closed-loop transfer functions ourselves. For example, if we have a proportional controller with Gc = Kc, and a first order process, all we need are the following... 

The present paper applies state variable techniques of modern control theory to the process. The introduction of a dynamic transfer function to manipulate flow rate removes much of the transient fluctuations in the production rate. Furthermore, state variable feedback with pole placement improves the speed of response by about six times. 

---