Friction loading magnitude

Figure 5.19(c) of the EUROCOMP Design Code shows the shear stress distribution, sn. along the so-called shear-out plane. The actual stress field depends on a number of parameters such as elastic properties of the laminate and the fastener, clearance, friction and load magnitude, and loading direction (tensile or compressive). 

The often-cited Amontons law [101. 102] describes friction in tenns of a friction coefiBcient, which is, a priori, a material constant, independent of contact area or dynamic parameters, such as sliding velocity, temperature or load. We know today that all of these parameters can have a significant influence on the magnitude of the measured friction force, especially in thin-film and boundary-lubricated systems. 

The Y-axis represents the magnitude of the friction signal force and the X-axis is the load. The slope of the trend line is dehned as the friction factor (friction force signal/load) which is used to express the relative friction coefficient (friction force/load). Experiments that have been done in the same monolayer L-B him but different scan ranges give similar results as shown in Fig. 24 and Fig. 25. The friction factors of this monolayer L-B him, 0.0265 and 0.0203, are similar. The topographies of these two areas are shown in Fig. 26. 

Two types of results are obtained from mechanical sensitivity tests (1) no reaction, or (2) decomposition with or without an explosion. The magnitude of friction and the impact sensitivity reported is the smallest load at which a positive result has been noted. The objective of mechanical sensitivity testing is to establish whether or not the substance is sensitive under normal handling conditions. However, this objective may not be reached. The test results may not truly reflect process conditions because most testing is carried out at ambient temperature and pressure. Since results are dependent on the type of test apparatus used, the interpretation of the results for use in practical applications requires much experience in this field of testing. 

The occurrence of either partial slip or gross slip condition is dependent on the material mechanical properties, the magnitude of the coefficient of friction and the contact loading parameters (normal load, imposed displacement). When dealing with non-adhesive elastic materials, the effects of these... 

The frictional properties of molybdenum disulphide films have been discussed in the previous two chapters, and it is not necessary to repeat the same information here. However, before proceeding to discuss the influence of various factors on the magnitude of the friction, it may be worth emphasizing the fact that friction varies with the gaseous environment, humidity, temperature, load, purity and the state of orientation and consolidation of a film. No-one has ever attempted the huge task of carrying out a parametric study of all these factors together, and most of the published work has failed to define one or more of the influential conditions. As a result it is very difficult to establish absolute values of the coefficient of friction in any particular situation. 

For the fluids and the monoliths considered in this comparison, this limit is approximately 0.50 m/sec (depending on the catalyst load), which is in good agreement with the value found experimentally by Irandoust et al. [12]. If the liquid load is less than this limit, gas will be sucked in as well. Hence the sum of the linear velocities will tend to be close to the maximum flow rate of liquid alone. Frictional pressure drop in the MR is up to two orders of magnitude lower than in the TBR. Consequently, for the MR we may consider very high flow rates and high columns, higher than appears to be of practical interest, before the pressure drop becomes a restriction with the physical properties considered. For practical reasons an upper limit of 20 m for Lp was taken. In order to make a comparison between the MR and the TBR, some more restrictions were imposed. In a consecutive-reaction system like the one considered, selectivities must be compared at the same conversion, and results discussed below are for a 50% conversion of reactant A. 

Friction and wear of metal oxide filled PTFE can be improved by liquid paraffin lubrication, and the friction coefficient decreases by one order of magnitude. On the other hand, the interaction between liquid paraffin oil and metal oxide filled PTFE reduces load-carrying capacity because of absorption on the surface layers of composite. ... 

---