Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Scan range

No powder diffraction experiment should be started at 20s = 0°, since the extremely high intensity of the incident beam at full tube power may damage the detector even when the narrowest slits have been used. The most dependable way to determine 20s for an overnight or a weekend experiment is to perform a quick scan at 5 to 10 deg/min beginning at the minimum allowable Bragg angle and ending at 20e = 30 to 40°. Based on this result, the correct 20s may be properly selected.  [Pg.324]

Other considerations are what is the purpose of powder diffraction data, which wavelength is used and what is the nature of the examined material Thus, when employing Cu Ka radiation  [Pg.324]

Reminder onee the 20s has been found, the divergenee slit for the complete experiment should be selected based on the actual size of the prepared specimen as was discussed in sections 3.5.3 and 3.6.4. [Pg.324]

50 to 80° and 20e near the physical limit of the goniometer, and the proper 20e is selected a few degrees higher than the last distinguishable Bragg peak. [Pg.325]

When using short wavelengths, the diffi action pattern is compressed to [Pg.325]


When evaluating gas concentrations in practical applications, a reterence spectrum is least squares fitted to the received absorption spectrum. This im proves the system accuracy, since the spectral fingerprint over the whole scanning range contributes to the result.- ... [Pg.1303]

Fig. 16—Topography of star-shaped Cgo-Pst L-B films (scan range 2 y m), (a) monolayer, (b) four layers. Fig. 16—Topography of star-shaped Cgo-Pst L-B films (scan range 2 y m), (a) monolayer, (b) four layers.
Fig. 24—Diagram of friction versus Load of monolayer Cjo-Pst polymer molecules L-B film (point A, scan range 2 yiim). Fig. 24—Diagram of friction versus Load of monolayer Cjo-Pst polymer molecules L-B film (point A, scan range 2 yiim).
Fig. 26—AFM topography of monolayer L-B film for two different areas [(a) point A, (b) point B] (a) scan range 2 /i.m (b) scan range 1 /u.m. Fig. 26—AFM topography of monolayer L-B film for two different areas [(a) point A, (b) point B] (a) scan range 2 /i.m (b) scan range 1 /u.m.
Figure 24 is a diagram of friction versus load derived from the friction force images of the above hgures. Figure 25 is also a diagram of friction versus load done in the same monolayer L-B him of C Q-Pst polymer but in a different scan range. [Pg.199]

The Y-axis represents the magnitude of the friction signal force and the X-axis is the load. The slope of the trend line is dehned as the friction factor (friction force signal/load) which is used to express the relative friction coefficient (friction force/load). Experiments that have been done in the same monolayer L-B him but different scan ranges give similar results as shown in Fig. 24 and Fig. 25. The friction factors of this monolayer L-B him, 0.0265 and 0.0203, are similar. The topographies of these two areas are shown in Fig. 26. [Pg.199]

A serious limitation of the STM technique so far is its lack of chemical sensitivity. Generally, STM is not specific for the elemental species in multi-component systems, though there are special cases where the direction of charge flow is well known as shown for the GaAs(llO) surface. The surface area which one is looking at by STM is typically quite small. The problem of how representative the obtained tunnel vision is, is at least partly solved by considerably increasing the total scan range of STM/SPM instruments. [Pg.26]

Figure 14.2 Cyclic base voltainmograms of Ru(OOOl) in 0.1 M HCIO4, 50mVs scan range 0.1-1.05 V (solid line) and —0.12 —1.05 V (dotted Une). Also indicated are LEED patterns reported in [Zei and Ertl, 2000] after emersion at 0.35, 0.75, and 1.2 V and anodic charges per surface atom transferred at different potentials according to El-Aziz and Kibler [2002]. Figure 14.2 Cyclic base voltainmograms of Ru(OOOl) in 0.1 M HCIO4, 50mVs scan range 0.1-1.05 V (solid line) and —0.12 —1.05 V (dotted Une). Also indicated are LEED patterns reported in [Zei and Ertl, 2000] after emersion at 0.35, 0.75, and 1.2 V and anodic charges per surface atom transferred at different potentials according to El-Aziz and Kibler [2002].
For the confirmatory procedure, it is recommended that the sponsor develop spectral data based on at least three structurally specific ions that completely define the marker residue molecule. These ions may or may not include the molecular ion. The use of water loss and isotopic ions is usually unacceptable and CVM concurrence should be sought when water loss ions or isotopic ions are selected for the confirmatory analysis. The proposed fragment ion structures should be consistent with the fragmentation pattern, and justification for specificity of selected ions or scan range should be included. All confirmation criteria should be specified in the standard operating procedure. [Pg.86]

Justification for specificity of selected ions or scan range. [Pg.88]

Molecular weights of the copolymers were determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) with four p-styragel (Haters) columns calibrated using polystyrene standards. Chloroform was used as the eluate at a flow rate 1.5 ml/min. An LKB-2140 Ultraviolet Photodiode Array detector was used to detect the polymer with a scan range from 190 to 370 nm. [Pg.113]

Because wax and lipid substances may contain high molecular constituents, a first run is usually performed with a scan range from m/z 50 to 900 or 1000. In a second step, if the mass spectrum excludes the presence of high molecular weight compounds, and if enough matter is available for analysis, another run is performed over a narrower scan range, often between m/z 50 and 500 (Colombini et al., 2005b). [Pg.102]

Similar to those observed with the cysteine-modified electrode in Cu, Zn-SOD solution [98], CVs obtained at the MPA-modified Au electrode in phosphate buffer containing Fe-SOD or Mn-SOD at different potential scan rates (v) clearly show that the peak currents obtained for each SOD are linear with v (not v 1/2) over the potential scan range from 10 to 1000 mVs-1. This observation reveals that the electron transfer of the SODs is a surface-confined process and not a diffusion-controlled one. The previously observed cysteine-promoted surface-confined electron transfer process of Cu, Zn-SOD has been primarily elucidated based on the formation of a cysteine-bridged SOD-electrode complex oriented at an electrode-solution interface, which is expected to sufficiently facilitate a direct electron transfer between the metal active site in SOD and Au electrodes. Such a model appears to be also suitable for the SODs (i.e. Cu, Zn-SOD, Fe-SOD, and Mn-SOD) with MPA promoter. The so-called... [Pg.183]

Careful setting of the scan range is recommended. The narrower the scan range, the higher the number of data points per peak. This is not necessarily a linear relation it can depend on the MS. If a large mass range and fast data acquisition rate are required, a time-of-flight (ToF) MS would be... [Pg.106]

Another data acquisition consideration is data file size. A high speed LC/MS data file can easily reach dimensions of 20 MB/min if maximal information is required and the detectors are set to broadest scan ranges and highest sampling rates without data reduction. LC/MS systems capable... [Pg.107]

FIGURE 8 Gas chromatographic separation of the volatiles of D. diemensis egg extracts (47). Conditions fused silica column OV 1 (10 m X 0.32 mm) 50°C isotherm for 2 min, then at 10°C/min to 250°C injection port 250°C detector Finnigan ion trap, ITD 800 transfer line at 270°C electron impact (70 eV) scan range, 35-250 Da/sec. For identity of numbered compounds refer to Figure 9. [Pg.108]

Cyclic voltammetry was conducted using a Powerlab ADI Potentiostat interfaced to a computer. A typical three electrode system was used for the analysis Ag/AgCl electrode (2.0 mm) as reference electrode Pt disc (2.0 mm) as working electrode and Pt rod (2.0 mm) as auxiliary electrode. The supporting electrolyte used was a TBAHP/acetonitrile electrolyte-solvent system. The instrument was preset using a Metrohm 693 VA Processor. Potential sweep rate was 200 mV/s using a scan range of-1,800 to 1,800 mV. [Pg.179]


See other pages where Scan range is mentioned: [Pg.87]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.493]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.629]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.98]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.523 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info