Band theory free electron

As the name implies, the phenomenon is based on coating a solid metal with a liquid metal. In our theory, liquid metal (being above its melting temperature) has no covalent bonds and the free electrons essentially provide the cohesive energy. It can be recalled that this was the basis for obtaining the correlation (Fig. 11). Thus, by coating a metal that has a distinct ratio of covalent bond over free electron band with a liquid metal that has only free electrons (no covalent bond) can have no effect whatsoever in the AEi (for these notations refer to Fig. 9) which has to do only with covalent bond. This is the observation of 4.1.3. 

It is well known through our experience that material with conduction electrons suffer from the phenomenon called corrosion i.e., metals turning into metallic oxides in time in air. On the other hand, the materials without conduction electrons do not suffer from corrosion. Technically, the presence of conduction electrons implies the existence of free electrons and conduction band. As pointed out in the mechanical property section these two distinct properties exhibit themselves also in term of plasticity . That is, the existence of free electron band allows plastic deformation whereas in the absence of free electron band the plasticity is nonexistent. It is recalled that the theory we are proposing for metals and alloys requires not only the coexistence of covalent bond and free electron band but also that the ratio of the number of these two type of electrons be maintained at a constant value for a given metal. Within such understanding, we now construct corrosion process in steps ... 

Mott originally considered an array of monovalent metal ions on a lattice, in which the interatomic distance, d, may be varied. Very small interatomic separations correspond to the condensed crystalline phase. Because the free-electron-Uke bands are half-filled in the case of ions with a single valence electron, one-electron band theory predicts metallic behavior. However, it predicts that the array will be metallic, regardless of the interatomic separation. Clearly, this can t be true given that, in the opposite extreme, isolated atoms are electrically insulating. 

Let us now complete the derivation of formulae for the interatomic matrix elemenfis, which was described in Section 2-D, by equating band energies obtained from LCAO theory and those obtained from nearly-free-electron bands. This analysis follows a study by Froyen and Harrison (1979). The band energies obtained from nearest-neighbor LCAO theory at symmetry points were given in... 

The connection with pseudopotential theory will also enable us to obtain other parameters of the energy bands in terms of the d-state radius r,. We now have an electronic structure based upon d states, which are coupled to each other according to Eq. (20-45). They are also coupled to free-electron bands, as seen in... 

Finally, lei us use the transition-metal pseudopotential theory to estimate matrix elements between d states and s and p states. These are not so useful in the transition metals themselves since the description of the electronic structure is better made in terms of d bands coupled to free-electron bands, ti k /(2m) d-<01 IT 10>, rather than in terms of d bands coupled to s and p bands. However, the matrix elements and so forth, directly enter the electronic structure of the transition-metal compounds, and it is desirable to obtain these matrix elements in terms of the d-state radius r. We do this by writing expressions for the bands in terms of pseudopotentials and equating them to the LCAO expressions obtained in Section 20-A. 

For analysis of the transition metals themselves, the use of free-electron bands and LCAO d states is preferable. The analysis based upon transition-metal pseudopotential theory has shown that the interatomic matrix elements between d states, the hybridization between the free-electron and d bands, and the resulting effective mass for the free-electron bands can all be written in terms of the d-state radius r, and values for have been listed in the Solid State Table. 

Fig. 22. L3 palladium edge of Pd metal (dotted line) compared with one-electron band theory (solid line) taking account of the partial (1 = 2) local density of states, of the inelastic mean free path and of the core-hole lifetime. The dashed line shows the total density of states of palladium metal, which is quite different from the absorption spectrum. The zero of the energy scale is fixed at the Fermi energy...

Fig. 16. The Mott metal-insulator transition as a function of separation between lattice sites, a. Curve A is the conductivity versus the inverse of the lattice spacing predicted by Mott. Curve B is conductivity versus the inverse of the lattice spacing predicted by one electron band theory, assuming a finite mean free path for electrons in the metallic phase.

We should point out that up to now we have considered only polycrystals characterized by an a priori surface area depleted in principal charge carriers. For instance, chemisorption of acceptor particles which is accompanied by transition-free electrons from conductivity band to adsorption induced SS is described in this case in terms of the theory of depleted layer [31]. This model is applicable fairly well to describe properties of zinc oxide which is oxidized in air and is characterized by the content of surface adjacent layers which is close to the stoichiometric one [30]. 

According to the electronic theory, a particle chemisorbed on the surface of a semiconductor has a definite affinity for a free electron or, depending on its nature, for a free hole in the lattice. In the first case the chemisorbed particle is presented in the energy spectrum of the lattice as an acceptor and in the second as a donor surface local level situated in the forbidden zone between the valency band and the conduction band. In the general case, one and the same particle may possess an affinity both for an electron and a hole. In this case two alternative local levels, an acceptor and a donor, will correspond to it. 

One further effect of the formation of bands of electron energy in solids is that the effective mass of electrons is dependent on the shape of the E-k curve. If this is the parabolic shape of the classical free electron theory, the effective mass is the same as the mass of the free electron in space, but as this departs from the parabolic shape the effective mass varies, depending on the curvature of the E-k curve. From the definition of E in terms of k, it follows that the mass is related to the second derivative of E with respect to k thus... 

In band theory the electrons responsible for conduction are not linked to any particular atom. They can move easily throughout the crystal and are said to be free or very nearly so. The wave functions of these electrons are considered to extend throughout the whole of the crystal and are delocalized. The outer electrons in a solid, that is, the electrons that are of greatest importance from the point of view of both chemical and electronic properties, occupy bands of allowed energies. Between these bands are regions that cannot be occupied, called band gaps. 

The free-electron model is a simplified representation of metallic bonding. While it is helpful for visualizing metals at the atomic level, this model cannot sufficiently explain the properties of all metals. Quantum mechanics offers a more comprehensive model for metallic bonding. Go to the web site above, and click on Web Links. This will launch you into the world of molecular orbitals and band theory. Use a graphic organizer or write a brief report that compares the free-electron and band-theory models of metallic bonding. 

The free-electron theory of metals was developed in three main stages (1) classical free-electron theory, (2) quantum free-electron theory, and (3) band theory. 

Band Theory of Metals, Three approaches predict the electronic band structure of metals. The first approach (Kronig-Penney), the periodic potential method, starts with free electrons and then considers nearly bound electrons. The second (Ziman) takes into account Bragg reflection as a strong disturbance in the propagation of electrons. The third approach (Feynman) starts with completely bound electrons to atoms and then considers a linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAOs). 

On surfaces of some d band metals, the 4= states dominated the surface Fermi-level LDOS. Therefore, the corrugation of charge density near the Fermi level is much higher than that of free-electron metals. This fact has been verified by helium-beam diffraction experiments and theoretical calculations (Drakova, Doyen, and Trentini, 1985). If the tip state is also a d state, the corrugation amplitude can be two orders of magnitude greater than the predictions of the 4-wave tip theory, Eq. (1.27) (Tersoff and Hamann, 1985). The maximum enhancement factor, when both the surface and the tip have d- states, can be calculated from the last row of Table 6.2. For Pt(lll), the lattice constant is 2.79 A, and b = 2.60 A . The value of the work function is c() w 4 cV, and k 1.02 A . From Eq. (6.54), y 3.31 A . The enhancement factor is... 

Chapter 2 introduces the band theory of solids. The main approach is via the tight binding model, seen as an extension of the molecular orbital theory familiar to chemists. Physicists more often develop the band model via the free electron theory, which is included here for completeness. This chapter also discusses electronic condnctivity in solids and in particular properties and applications of semiconductors. 

Impurities in semiconductors, which release either free electrons or free holes (the absence of an electron in an otherwise filled sea of electrons), also give rise to optical properties at low energies below the minimum band gap (e.g., 1.1 eV for Si) that are characteristic of the Drude theory. Plasma frequencies for such doped semiconductors may be about 0.1 eV. 

---