Flow injection analysis recording

Flow injection analysis is a rapid method of automated chemical analysis that allows for quasi-continuous recording of nutrient concentrations in a flowing stream of seawater. The apparatus used for flow injection analysis is generally less expensive and more rugged than that used in segmented continuous flow analysis. A modified flow injection analysis procedure, called reverse flow injection analysis, was adopted by Thompson et al. [213] and has been adapted for the analysis of dissolved silicate in seawater. The reagent is injected into the sample stream in reverse flow injection analysis, rather than vice versa as in flow injection analysis. This results in an increase in sensitivity. 

Fig. 24 Recorder output of the flow injection analysis system for triplicate 300 xL sample solutions of Cd(N03 b at a flow rate of 2.5 mL miir1...

The aim is to monitor reactions using a technique called flow injection analysis (FIA) which is used to record a UV/vis spectrum of a sample. These spectra are reported as... 

One can then infer that flow injection analysis relies on three cornerstone features sample injection, controlled dispersion and reproducible timing [50]. A typical flow injection analyser and the related recorder output are shown in Fig. 2.7. 

E.A.G. Zagatto, O. Bahia-Filho, FI. Bergamin-Filho, Recording the real sample distribution and concentration time functions in flow injection analysis, Anal. Chim. Acta 193 (1987) 309. 

FIGURE 4.13 Schlieren signals recorded for different solutions with the same refractive index. Carrier stream = water coiled reactor length = 100 cm a. b, c, d = 2.0 mol L-1 HC1,11.2% (m/v) sucrose, 14% (m/v) glycerol, and 24.13% (m/v) ethanol respectively. Other conditions are as in Fig. 4.13. Reprinted from Anal. Chim. Acta 234 (1990) 153, E.A.G. Zagatto, M.A.Z. Arruda, A.O. Jacintho, I.L. Mattos, Compensation of the Schlieren effect in flow-injection analysis by using dual-wavelength spectrophotometry, with permission from Elsevier (Ref [28]). 

The injected sample volume is by far the most important parameter affecting dispersion in flow injection analysis, as it has a pronounced influence on the height, width and area of the recorded peak (Fig. 5.11). 

FIGURE 5.11 Recorded peaks for different sample injected volumes. X — sample volumetric fraction S — injection instant. The recording tracings correspond to loop-based injections of 59,108,206,403 and 795 pL into a single line flow injection system. Adapted from Anal. Chim. Acta 99 (1978) 37, ]. Ruzicka, E.H. Hansen, Flow injection analysis. Part X. Theory, techniques and trends, with permission from Elsevier (Ref. [80]). 

Another parameter affecting sample dispersion in flow injection analysis is the way that the sample is inserted. The influence of Vs on the shape of the recorded signal is, however, relatively independent of the mode of sample insertion, and this is perhaps the main reason why this aspect is rarely reported. 

The length of the analytical path plays an important role in the extent of sample dispersion in flow injection analysis. Increasing this length decreases the recorded peak height and increases sample broadening, with these effects being more evident for lower path lengths (Fig. 5.13). 

FIGURE 5.15 Influence of the confluence stream flow rate QCf- h and s = recorded peak height (A) and width (mL) carrier stream flow rate — 1.6 mL min-1 a, b, c = 5,50 and 250-cm loop lengths (ca 25, 250 and 1250 pL injected volumes) other experimental conditions as in Ref. [84]. Adapted from Anal. Chim. Acta 198 (1987) 153, E.A.G. Zagatto, B.F. Reis, M. Martinelli, F.J. Krug, H. Bergamin-Filho, M.F. Gine, Confluent streams in flow injection analysis, with permission from Elsevier. 

M. Valcarcel, M.D. Luque de Castro, F. Lazaro, A. Rios, Multiple peak recordings in flow injection analysis, Anal. Chim. Acta 216 (1989) 275. 

The classical manifold architecture in Fig. 8.22, upper was exploited in the pioneering work incorporating GD in flow injection analysis for the spectrophotometric determination of total carbon dioxide in blood plasma [265]. Details of the separation unit are shown in Fig. 8.23, left. The donor stream with the sample zone was acidified and the released CO2 diffused through the membrane towards the acceptor stream, which was an alkaline cresol-red indicator solution. Analyte collection resulted in a transient lowering of the pfi of this stream and hence a transient modification to the monitored absorbance. The recorded peak height was proportional to the CO2 content in the injectate. 

Flow injection analysis (FIA) is based on the injection of a liquid sample into a moving, nonsegmented continuous carrier stream of a suitable liquid. The injected sample forms a zone, which is then transported toward a detector that continously records the absorbance, electrode potential, or other physical parameter as it continuously changes due to the passage of the sample material through the flow cell [1, 153]. 

The ECL measurement is carried out as a simple batch measurement or alternatively in a liquid stream. In the first case a spike of the analyte is added to the appropriate electrolyte solution, the solution is transferred to the cell, and the ECL signal is recorded. In the latter case, the sample is injected into the flowing liquid, which transfers it to the ECL cell either with (e.g., liquid chromatography (LC)) or without (flow injection analysis) a separation step. 

A hydrodynamic voltammogram is a current-potential curve which shows the dependence of the chromatographic peak height on the detection potential. The technique used to obtain the necessary information is voltammetric flow injection analysis. in which an aliquot of the analyte is injected into the flowing eluent prior to the detector and the peak current recorded. This is repeated many times, the detector potential being changed after each injection, until the peak current - potential plot reaches a plateau or a maximum, as shown... 

Flow injection analysis is an analytical technique based on injecting a known volume of sample into carrier or reagent streams that are transported in small-diameter conduits (typically 0.5-0.8 mm internal diameter) under laminar flow conditions (Ruzicka and Hansen, 1988 Taljaard and van Staden, 1998 McKelvie, 2008 van Staden and van Staden, 2012 Worsfold et ah, 2013). In this moving stream, the sample does not decompose it is physically and chemically converted into a detectable species that causes a detector response downstream of the injection point (Ruzicka and Hansen, 1988 Taljaard and van Staden, 1998 Saurina, 2008 Saurina, 2010 van Staden and van Staden, 2012). The results will be reproducible on condition that all critical parameters (reproducible injection, controlled reaction time, and controlled dispersion) are held within certain tolerance levels (Ruzicka and Hansen, 1988 Taljaard and van Staden, 1998 van Staden and van Staden, 2012). The basic FIA instrument is composed of a multichannel pump, an injection valve, a flow-through detector, and a signal output device (originally a recorder, lately a computer) (van Staden and van Staden, 2012). Before FIA, relevant variables such as flow rates, reactor dimensions, injection volume(s) and chemical (reaction) conditions... 

---