Flow Control Implementation Strategy

The turbulent flow control can be implemented through different control schemes (Gad-el-Hak, 2000). They are (1) predetermined open-loop control, (2) reactive feed-forward open-loop control, and (3) reactive feedback closed-loop control. The physical arrangement of sensors and actuators depends on the nature of control schemes and flow characteristics. The criteria for selection of appropriate actuators have been discussed in the next section. It should be noted that the actuators require parasitic power supply for its operation. This fact should be taken into consideration for overall performance analysis of actuators. 

The control sensors are used for verification of control objectives. When the objective is to reduce drag, the control signal is the shear stress. Similarly, for reduction of pressure fluctuations, the control sensors provide the rms value of pressure fluctuations. For implementation of the control scheme, the relationship/transfer function between the upstream sensors and 

---

Intermediate surge can be provided at a lower temperature. This is often practiced when the intermediate material is thermally unstable. To minimize heat losses, it is usually desirable to devise a control strategy that preferentially feeds the hot material into the next column (e.g., Fig. 19.14). However, such a strategy will be self-defeating if implemented at the expense of excessive flow fluctuations to the downstream column. In Fig. 19.14, column I s bottom flow controller must be set low enough so that the column level controller always stays on control. 

Freeway management provides transportation managers the capability to monitor traffic and environmental conditions on the freeway system, identify flow impediments, implement control and management strategies, and disseminate critical information to travelers... 

Several control design strategies may be appropriate for the control of air and oxygen flow delivery valves. A simple controller is the proportional plus integral controller that can be readily implemented in a microprocessor. For example, the controller for the air valve has the following form ... 

We present an overview of the basic strategy in Section 8.1.1. Two control implementations are presented. Section 8.1.2 describes a simplified scheme that supports data-dependent delay operations and multiple execution flows, but the resulting control is not precise. We extend the simplified scheme in Section 8.1.3 to obtain a precise control implementation. Analysis of adaptive control is presented in Section 8.1.4. 

In order to operate a process facility in a safe and efficient manner, it is essential to be able to control the process at a desired state or sequence of states. This goal is usually achieved by implementing control strategies on a broad array of hardware and software. The state of a process is characterized by specific values for a relevant set of variables, eg, temperatures, flows, pressures, compositions, etc. Both external and internal conditions, classified as uncontrollable or controllable, affect the state. Controllable conditions may be further classified as controlled, manipulated, or not controlled. Excellent overviews of the basic concepts of process control are available (1 6). 

To regulate the air flow rate with respect to the fuel gas flow rate, we can use ratio control. Fig. 10.5 illustrates one of the simplest implementations of this strategy. Let s say the air to fuel gas flow rates must be kept at some constant ratio... 

Active control was implemented by imposing the oscillations at the dominant frequency but with a difference in phase, and the control strategy was similar to that of [8] and only essential details are provided here. The actuators used to impose oscillations on the flow of fuel have been characterized in [f4], and the details given here are limited to those most relevant to the present experiments. 

The analytical predictor, as well as the other dead-time compensation techniques, requires a mathematical model of the process for implementation. The block diagram of the analytical predictor control strategy, applied to the problem of conversion control in an emulsion polymerization, is illustrated in Figure 2(a). In this application, the current measured values of monomer conversion and initiator feed rate are input into the mathematical model which then calculates the value of conversion T units of time in the future assuming no changes in initiator flow or reactor conditions occur during this time. 

This article presents the design and implementation of a software sensor for the continuous determination of substrate concentration based on a simple model of a fed-batch fermentation process and the available signals of two other sensors—one for on-line biomass determination (7) and the other for on-line ethanol determination (8)—developed in previous works. The software sensor proposed provides a continuous signal that can be used in a control loop to manipulate the substrate feed flow in order to maintain almost constant substrate concentration and obtain an excellent level of productivity and yield during all of the process, as shown in experimental control strategy studies in previous works (9). 

We say that the inventory is self-regulating. Similarly, the plantwide control can fix the flow rate of reactant at the plant inlet. When the reactant accumulates, the consumption rate increases until it balances the feed rate. This strategy is based on a self-regulation property. The second strategy is based on feedback control of the inventory. This consists of measuring the component inventory and implementing a feedback control loop, as in Fig. 4.2(b). Thus, the increase or decrease of the reactant inventory is compensated by less or more reactant being added into the process. 

In order to implement a MPC strategy to optimize the operations of the FISC, the system has to be conceptualized as a dynamic entity in terms of states, input and outputs [5]. Some inputs will constitute disturbances to the model and some others manipulated variables for control purposes. A subset of the output variables will be controlled outputs whose values will be desired to follow some predefined trajectory or assume particular values in certain periods of the control horizon. For the FISC system, the state variables are the inventories of the different goods in the storage facilities fresh fruit (NPFS), packed fruit (PFS, PPFS) and concentrated juice (CJS, PCJS). The manipulated variables are the flows of all the streams of the system (Fig. 1). The FISC is considered to be a centralized system [6]. For the MPC implementation, the overall profit of the business is maximized in each time period for a certain planning horizon, subject to the mass balance model of system. 

---