Feedforward networks

The feedforward network shown in Figure 10.22 eonsists of a three neuron input layer, a two neuron output layer and a four neuron intermediate layer, ealled a hidden layer. Note that all neurons in a partieular layer are fully eonneeted to all neurons in the subsequent layer. This is generally ealled a fully eonneeted multilayer network, and there is no restrietion on the number of neurons in eaeh layer, and no restrietion on the number of hidden layers. 

The Back-Propagation Algorithm (BPA) is a supervised learning method for training ANNs, and is one of the most common forms of training techniques. It uses a gradient-descent optimization method, also referred to as the delta rule when applied to feedforward networks. A feedforward network that has employed the delta rule for training, is called a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP). 

Homik, K., Stinchcombe, M., and White, H., Multi-layer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks 2, 359 (1989). 

One layer of input nodes and another of output nodes form the bookends to one or more layers of hidden nodes Signals flow from the input layer to the hidden nodes, where they are processed, and then on to the output nodes, which feed the response of the network out to the user. There are no recursive links in the network that could feed signals from a "later" node to an "earlier" one or return the output from a node to itself. Because the messages in this type of layered network move only in the forward direction when input data are processed, this is known as a feedforward network. 

Feedforward networks that employ a suitable activation function are very powerful. A network that contains a sufficient number of nodes in just one hidden layer can reproduce any continuous function. With the addition of a second hidden layer, noncontinuous functions can also be modeled. 

Since the activity of unit i depends on the activity of all nodes closer to the input, we need to work through the layers one at a time, from input to output. As feedforward networks contain no loops that feed the output of one node back to a node earlier in the network, there is no ambiguity in doing this. 

Feedforward networks of the sort described in this chapter are the type most widely used in science, but other types exist. In contrast to a feedforward... 

Although the SOM is a type of neural network, its structure is very different from that of the feedforward artificial neural network discussed in Chapter 2. While in a feedforward network nodes are arranged in distinct layers, a SOM is more democratic—every node occupies a site of equal importance in a regular lattice. 

Now that the SOM has been constructed and the weights vectors have been filled with random numbers, the next step is to feed in sample patterns. The SOM is shown every sample in the database, one at a time, so that it can learn the features that characterize the data. The precise order in which samples are presented is of no consequence, but the order of presentation is randomized at the start of each cycle to avoid the possibility that the map may learn something about the order in which samples appear as well as the features within the samples themselves. A sample pattern is picked at random and fed into the network unlike the patterns that are used to train a feedforward network, there is no target response, so the entire pattern is used as input to the SOM. 

Just as there are several varieties of evolutionary algorithm, so the neural network is available in several flavors. We shall consider feedforward networks and, briefly, Kohonen networks and growing cell structures, but Hop-field networks, which we shall not cover in this chapter, also find some application in science.31... 

In a standard feedforward network, the raw data that the network is to assess are fed in and the network responds by generating some output. The input data might be for example ... 

A feedforward network, the type most commonly used in chemistry, is constructed from several artificial neurons (Figure 6), which are joined together to form a single processing unit. The operation of each artificial... 

The structure of a SOM is different from that of the feedforward network. Instead of the layered structure of the feedforward network, there is a single layer of nodes, which functions both as an input layer and an output layer. In a feedforward network, each node performs a processing task, accepting input, processing it, and generating an output signal. By contrast, in a SOM, every node stores a vector whose dimensionality and type matches that of the samples. Thus, if the samples consist of infrared spectra, each node on the SOM stores a pseudo-infrared spectrum (Figure 12). The spectra at the nodes are refined as the network learns about the data in the database and the vector at each node eventually becomes a blended composite of all spectra in the database. 

Now we can look at the biochemical networks developed in this work and compare them to the recurrent networks discussed above. Network A (Section 4.2.1) and Network C (Section 4.2.3) are fully connected to one another, and the information flows back and forth from each neuron to all the others. This situation is very much hke the one described for recurrent neural networks, and in these cases, memory, which is a necessary to demonstrate computational power, is clearly incorporated in the networks. Network B (Section 4.2.2) is a feedforward network and thus appears to have no memory in this form. However, when we examine the processes taking place in the biochemical neuron more carefully, we can see that the enzymic reactions take into account the concentration of the relevant substrates present in the system. These substrates can be fed as inputs at any time t. However, part of them also remained from the reactions that took place at time t — and thus the enzymic system in every form is influenced by the processes that took place at early stages. Hence, memory is always incorporated. 

In this way, the most common ANN used for numerical models is known as the multilayer feedforward network, and is sketched in Fig. 30.3 the scheme represents the approach for a simultaneous calibration model of two species, A and B, departing from the readings of four ISE sensors. 

One of the most remarkable features of feedforward networks is the possibility to approximate, with an arbitrarily prescribed precision, even extremely complicated and extremely general dependencies [36-43]. In catalysis we are primarily interested in dependencies of catalyst performance, expressed as products yields, catalyst activity, conversion of feed molecules and products selectivity, on composition of the catalysts, their physical properties, and on reaction conditions. It is for the approximation of such dependencies that artificial neural networks have been used in catalysis so far [15-22]. 

For a detailed treatment of artificial neural networks, readers are again referred to specific monographs [35, 49-51], for a survey of their applications in chemistry to overview books [52, 53], reviews [54—56], and relevant sections of publications [57-59]. For heterogeneous catalysis, a recent overview has explained the applicability of feedforward networks to the approximation of unknown dependencies and to the extraction of logical rules from experimental data [22]. 

Among the most wide-spread neural networks are feedforward networks, namely multilayer perceptron (MLP). This network type has been proven to be universal function approximators [11], Another important feature of MLP is the ability to generalization. Therefore MLP can be powerful tool for design of intrusion detection systems. 

As neural network theory has been developed, the empiricism associated with the choices at each step, has given ways to heuristic rules and guidelines [5.48, 5.49]. Nevertheless, experience still plays an important part in designing a network. The network depicted in Fig. 5.13 is the most commonly used and is called the feedforward network because all signals flow forward. 

The way in which the neurons are interconnected is referred to as the network architecture or topology. A variety of network architectures has been developed for different applications, but one of the most common is the so-called multilayer perceptron (MLP) network, illustrated in Fig. 2. This is a feedforward network, the feed forward meaning that information is passed in one direction through the network from the inputs, through various hidden layers, to the outputs. The inputs are simply the input variables and, as stated above, in the case of formulation these correspond to ingredients, ingredient amounts, and processing conditions. The hidden layers are made up of perceptrons. Typically, one hidden layer is adequate to learn the relationships in most data sets two hidden layers should enable all... 

It is now well known that the artificial neural networks (ANNs) are nonlinear tools well suited to find complex relationships among large data sets [43], Basically an ANN consists of processing elements (i.e., neurons) organized in different oriented groups (i.e., layers). The arrangement of neurons and their interconnections can have an important impact on the modeling capabilities of the ANNs. Data can flow between the neurons in these layers in different ways. In feedforward networks no loops occur, whereas in recurrent networks feedback connections are found [79,80],... 

The connectionist model of Figure 15.1 is the model described as the learning model in chapter 14. It is a three-layer feedforward network with 27 input nodes, 14 hidden units, and 5 output... 

Single-layer feedforward networks include input layer of source nodes that projects onto an output layer of neurons (computation nodes), but not vice versa. They are also called feedforward networks. Since the computation takes place only on the output layer nodes, the input layer does not count as a layer (Figure 3.5(a)). 

Multi-layer feedforward networks contain an input layer connected to one or more layers of hidden neurons (hidden units) and an output layer (Figure 3.5(b)). The hidden units internally transform the data representation to extract higher-order statistics. The input signals are applied to the neurons in the first hidden layer, the output signals of that layer are used as inputs to the next layer, and so on for the rest of the network. The output signals of the neurons in the output layer reflect the overall response of the network to the activation pattern supplied by the source nodes in the input layer. This type of network is especially useful for pattern association (i.e., mapping input vectors to output vectors). 

---