Reports feedback

One of the principal elements of Green Zia that will be the focus of this paper is the third-party assessment and feedback report process. Like our Baldrige brethren at both the national level and at the state Quality Award Program level, Green Zia employs a number of volunteers to read applications that are submitted to our state Environment Department, provide nonprescriptive feedback on strengths and opportunities for improvement, determine a score for the application based on a 1000-point scale, and possibly conduct a site visit to verify/clarify the application. This paper will describe all aspects of the third-party examination process and will provide some personal insight as to the strengths and opportunities for improvement of our own process. 

Review of the application by a team of examiners, who prepare a feedback report including both strengths and opportunities for improvement and a score based on a 1000-point scale ... 

Determination by a panel of judges as to whether the applicant, based on the feedback report and score, will receive recognition and/or an award by the sponsoring organization and... 

Improvement of the organization s approach to quality, based, in part, on the feedback report. 

As mentioned earlier, examination teams usually are comprised of four to seven members to assure diversity of viewpoint. Consensus is used to make sure that the team is agreeable to all aspects of the feedback report. Consensus is often a difficult process, but it is necessary to make sure that the feedback is objective and as reliable as possible. Teams are often comprised of a combination of new and experienced examiners, again to ensure diversity of viewpoint and to minimize subjectivity. 

After the site visit, the team usually will revise the feedback report accordingly. Comments may be removed or modified to address what was discovered during the site visit. Opportunities for improvement that started with It is not clear, which is a common preface to an opportunity for improvement may be replaced with The applicant does not have. Sometimes strengths become opportunities for improvement or vice versa. The team does not necessarily need to rescore the application but they do need to convey to the judges whether their impression of the applicant after the site visit was better, worse, or stayed the same. This will allow the judges to make any final decisions regarding award or recognition level. 

Feedback. Report the measurements and analysis results back to the data providers. 

If R, value is large, the evaluation indexes in the evaluation system is very important, which could be used as a formal evaluation index. On the other hand, the evaluation index is necessary to be deleted. Through the statistical analysis of 50 effective feedback reports, the membership degree was lower than 0.3 of 15 evaluation indexes were deleted, and the 41 indicators were retained, which formed the second round safety, quality, progress, investment risk index system. 

Workplace-related psychological safety demonstrates itself when employees feel unable to put themselves on the line, ask questions, seek feedback, report problems, or propose a new idea without fearing negative consequences to themselves, their jobs, or their career. A psychologically safe and healthy workplace actively promotes emotional well-being among anployees while taking aU reasonable steps to minimize threats to employee mental health. 

The method presented in this paper is based on the existing curriculum of an autonomous institution where flexibility is given to the program coordinator and the board of studies to modify the course content and a new course can be introduced without removing the fundamental courses. PO attainment of a course is the sum of PO attainment obtained from the direct assessment tools and the indirect assessment tools. The direct assessment tool assumed in this method is Continuous Internal Evaluation (CIE) analysis which is derived from the test paper, quiz paper, and lab performance analysis of a class of students. The indirect assessment tools assumed here are the Semester End Exam (SEE) result analysis, exit survey report, and faculty feedback report. The program coordinator in consultation with the Academic Audit Committee fixes the weightage for the assessment tools, fii this paper, it is assumed that 70 % come from the CIE analysis, 10 % from the SEE analysis, 10 % from the exit survey, and 10 % from the faculty feedback report to calculate the PO attainment of a course through the CO attainment. The components of PO attainment are shown in Pig. 4. 

NUREG-1275, Vol. 10, Operating experience feedback report - Reliability of steam turbine-Driven standby pumps, October 1994. 

NUREG-1275, Operating experience feedback report, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

USNRC issued a number of Information Notices to alert its licensees to problems with instrument air systems. A report, NUREG-1275, Volume 2, "Operating Experience Feedback Report-Air Systems Problems was issued in 1987, covering 29 events at several plants. 

USNRC Generic Letter 91-15, Operating experience feedback report, solenoid operated valve problems at US reactors, issued September 23,1991. 

Gunawardena S, Ranganathan SS, Fernandopulle R. Pharmacovigilance through consumer feedback (reporting) in the mass treatment of lymphatic filariasis using diethylcarbamazine and albendazole in two districts of Sri Lanka. Trop Med Int Health 2008 13(9) 1153-8. 

The issue of measurement and feedback has already been discussed several times. It is critical to realize the motivational role of the measurement system and to recognize that the proper implementation of an effective feedback (reporting) mechanism will assure the ongoing success of the changes implemented. 

The process began with a detailed individual assessment, including a 360-degree diagnostic survey (see the discussion of the Leadership Diagnostic Instrument, or LDI, in chapter 4) and interviews with subordinates, peers, and managers. The assessment resulted in a detailed feedback report that gauged the individual s leadership style and best practices. Because this report employed information from coworkers familiar with each leader and supplied detailed examples of his or her leadership behavior, it filled a vacuum that most senior leaders experience—a lack of direct feedback on their leadership. 

The coach then reviewed the feedback report with the leader and helped him or her develop a coaching action plan. This plan identified areas for the leader to concentrate on, drawing on the critical behaviors, the actions needed to drive support for NASA s values, and the leadership best practices. Once the plan was developed, the coach gave the leader guidance in implementing it. 

---