Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Factor unification

Hence, the further development of quantitative copolymerization theory, as it ensues from the above-mentioned unsolved problems, is connected with the consideration of physical factors, along with chemical ones, which have a direct influence on process rate and statistical characteristics of the forming products. The future success in such a direction will be connected obviously with the unification of the ideas of chemical copolymerization theory, presented in this review, with the modern concepts of statistical physics both of macromolecules and copolymer solutions. [Pg.93]

Thus, a reduction factor Rf of 4 achieved by a disinfection technique means that the initial number of microorganisms (100%) was reduced by 99.99%, this being equivalent to a four log-unif of inactivation. [Pg.280]

In these situations, we cannot start the analysis of data without separating the effect of the external systematic influence from the unprocessed new data. In other words, we must separate the variations due to the actions of some factors with systematic influences from the original data. For this purpose, the methods of Latin squares and of effects of unification of factors have been developed in the plan of experiments. [Pg.437]

The method of the effects of the unification of factors considers that, for a fixed plan of experiments, we can produce different groups where each contains experiments presenting the same systematic influence [5.8, 5.13, 5.23, 5.35, 5.36]. To introduce this method, we can consider the case of a process with three factors analyzed with a CFE 2 plan of experiments. In our example, we will take into account the systematic influence of a new factor D. To begin this analysis, we will use the initial plan with eight experiments with the condition to separate these experiments into two blocks or groups ... [Pg.443]

A division into four blocks made from two unification relations, is also possible with a CEE 2 plan where the systematic influence of one or more factors is considered. If interactions AB and AC give the unification relations, then, by using the block division procedure used above (Table 5.63), the following blocks will be obtained ... [Pg.444]

The computation for the analysis of the variances is carried out following the procedure described in Section 5.6.3.1. When we begin to complete Table 5.52 as recommended by this procedure, we can observe that we must add the effect of the D factor as well as its interactions. Nevertheless, in this table, we cannot add the unification of the interactions accepted by the data provided by the division into blocks. In addition to the data described here, we have to realize the following computations in order to complete Table 5.52 ... [Pg.448]

At this point, we have to verify the eorreetness of the selection of the unification relations. When S sSint we can conclude that our selection for the unification relations is good in this case, we can also note that the calculations have been made without errors. Otherwise, if computation errors have not been detected, we have to observe that the selected interactions for the unification of blocks are strong and then they carmot be used as unification interactions. In this case, we have to carry out a new experimental research with a new plan. However, part of the experiments realized in the previous plan can be recuperated. Table 5.68 contains the synthesis of the analysis of the variances for the current example of an esterification reaction. We observe that, for the evolution of the factors, the molar ratio of reactants (B) prevails, whereas all other interactions, except interaction AC (temperature-reaction time), do not have an important influence on the process response (on the reaction conversion). This statement is sustained by all zero hypotheses accepted and reported in Table 5.68. It should be mentioned that the alcohol quality does not have a systematic influence on the esterification reaction efficiency. Indeed, the reaction can be carried out with the cheapest alcohol. As a conclusion, the analysis of the variances has shown that conversion enhancement can be obtained by increasing the temperature, reaction time and, catalyst concentration, independently or simultaneously. [Pg.449]

There is merit in the view that forces and entropy are important. There is merit in the view that geometry is a determining factor in self-assembly. But there have been few attempts at model self-assembly problems which embrace both views. The aim of this paper is to develop a simple theory dealing with one area of self-assembly, the spontaneous aggregation of one-component lipid suspensions, where the fusion of both notions results in a unification of a multiplicity of diverse observations. [Pg.240]

Quantitative evaluation of chemical processes in terms of environmental impact and eco-friendliness has gradually become a topic of great interest since the original introduction of the atom economy (AE) by Trost [1], and the E-factor by Sheldon [2]. Since then, other indexes have been proposed for the green metrics of chemical processes, such as effective mass yield (EMY) [3], reaction mass efficiency (RME) [4] and mass intensity (MI) [5], along with unification efforts [6, 7] and comparisons among these indexes [8]. [Pg.551]

Addition of ideal points at infinity results in the definition of jvdimensional projective space by n - -1 homogeneous coordinates, which remains valid on multiplication by an arbitrary gauge factor, the fundamental operation in field theory and wave mechanics. This property disappears on mapping to affine space where it is the subject of a special assumption. The unification of the electromagnetic and gravitational fields appears naturally only in projective space. [Pg.307]

The purpose of this volume, therefore, is to collect state-of-the-art procedures for construction and design of nanoparticles and porous materials, where their applications might be most appropriate. To that end, synthesis and characterization procedures are presented. The ultimate test is their practical utilization in real world environments that exist at the gas and liquid interfaces of these materials. Case studies are presented and, in some instances, conclusions and projections for optimal design procedures of nanoparticles and porous materials are offered. The scope of this volume is inherently multidisciplinary from the viewpoint of usage of materials. The common factor, however, is that their surface chemical behavior dom-mates, and thus, unification of purpose and scope becomes a reality. [Pg.11]

The volume is decreased by the factor nb, which accounts for fhe finite volume occupied by fhe gas molecules (Figure 10.25). The van der Waals consfanf b is a measure of fhe acfual volume occupied by a mole of gas molecules b has unifs of L/mol. The pressure is in torn decreased by fhe factor n ajV, which accounfs for fhe attractive forces between the gas molecules (Figure 10.26). The unusual form of fhis correction resulfs because fhe attractive forces between pairs of molecules increase as fhe square of fhe number of molecules per unif volume njV f-. Hence, fhe van der Waals consfanf a has unifs of L -afm/mol. The magnitode of a reflecfs how sfrongly fhe gas molecules aftracf each ofher. [Pg.395]

A number of factors contribute to complexity in larger organizations. Most companies have a "supply" side with incoming material as well as a "demand" side governing product or service distribution. Within the company walls are internal operations — another dimension. A further complication is handling different product and market combinations. Despite the movement toward European unification, the product sold in France may require a different approach from what it would in Germany. Also, a product may be sold under a company label in one market but under another s label in others. This could necessitate different approaches as well. [Pg.140]

The methodology for impact assessment is widely accepted and ISO standards have been established to compare and quantify the various weighing factors. The assessment consists of weighing the classes to integrate the environmental profiles such as effects on GHG emission, ozone depletion, acidification, or eutrophication. It is however unrealistic to desire unification into one environmental impact number for widely diverse ecological and economical effects. [Pg.550]

A convenient effect of the above changes to the conventional pressure loss expressions for the viscous and inertial flow regimes has been the unification of the dependencies on void fraction these are now the same in eqns (3.21) and (3.23). There is, however, another factor to consider regarding the general applicabihty of these relations. [Pg.23]


See other pages where Factor unification is mentioned: [Pg.304]    [Pg.572]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.891]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.179]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.443 ]




SEARCH



Unification

© 2024 chempedia.info