Exploratory factor analysis

It also seems likely that some mental disorders (perhaps major depressive disorder) in their present form will fail to show evidence of taxonicity, but definitional refinement would help elucidate underlying taxa (e.g., melancholia). Thus, taxometrics may be able to serve as an impetus and a guide for revising the diagnostic system. Of course, taxometric methods alone are not sufficient to tackle this task and should be used in conjunction with dimensional methods, such as exploratory factor analysis. Dimensions provide the building blocks for construction of taxa, and research on the structure of psychopathology should integrate dimensional and taxometric methods. 

L. Fabrigar, D. Wegener, R. MacCallum, E. Strahan, Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research, Psycological Methods 4 (3) (1999) 272-299. 

A. Costello, J. Osborne, Best practices in exploratory factor analysis Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research Evaluation 10 (7) (2005) 1-9. 

Lehto, M. R., James, D. S., and Foley, J. P. (1994), Exploratory Factor Analysis of Adolescent Attitudes Toward Alcohol and Risk, Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 25, pp. 197-213. 

Table 8.2 displays HSOPSC discrimination (a), as well as the four location parameters b, b, b, and b ) for each item. Note that HSOPSC items labelled with an r are reverse-scored. Items with poor discrimination (i.e. a < 1.35) are highlighted. These items (B3r, B4r, A9, All, A5r, A7r, F6r and A15) match those that were dropped, based on the results of an exploratory factor analysis conducted on data for the present study (Waterson et al. 2010), which highlights that the slope parameter is analogous to a factor loading (item-factor correlation) in factor analysis. In addition, item FI Ir Shift changes are problematic for patients in this hospital also had low discriminating power. 

Analyses of each instrument s psychometric properties has shown that exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted for two measures and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for two measrrres. In the case of 10 measures both methods were ttsed. 

The procedure of psychometric testing varies between the different studies included in this chapter. While many conducted no psychometric tests at all, two studies conducted a confirmatoiy factor analysis (CFA), two performed an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and 10 studies did both. Despite this difficulty, we found only one study (Piyseley 2008) out of 10 which performed a CFA in order to test the original factor stracture of the HSPSC questionnaire, with several unacceptable thresholds for both absolute and incremental fit indices. With regards to the EFAs, the dimensions Staffing , Communication openness , Organisational learning and Teamwork across hospital units , appeared to be less stable. 

For both translations, confirmatory factor analysis showed an acceptable fit with the original 12-dimensional model. Although exploratory factor analysis resulted in a 10-dimensional and a 9-dimensional stracture for, respectively, the Dutch and French questionnaires, based on the acceptable validity and reliability scores, it was concluded that no modifications were required to the original 12-factor model in order to allow internal and external benchmarking for the psychiatric hospitals. 

The questionnaire was piloted with a sample of air traffic controllers, engineers and managers from four ANSPs (different from those already canvassed) from across Europe in 2007 and 2008. In order to test the validity of the siuvey instrament, its construct validity (to ensure it was measuring safety culture and not something else), both exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) statistical techniques were applied (Gerbing and Hamilton 1996). 

Gerbing, D.W. and Hamilton, J.G. 1996. Viability of exploratory factor analysis as a precursor to confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modelling A Multidisciplinary Journal, 3, 62-72. 

Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) would discern the thematic patterns of mFSMAS on the basis of the sample data. However, as the sample size is limited to N =29, which means the sample to variable ratio is less than 3 1 (please see Brown and Onsman 2013) for arguments on sampling adequacy for factor analysis), the data is not sufficient to run EFA. Therefore, the factorial structure of an earlier study of mFSMAS on Turkish students in the context of chemistry education is used as a reference for the analysis (Kahveci, 2009). Table 1 shows the item-based factorial categories as drawn from Kahveci (2009) and Cronbach alpha values and the standardized descriptive statistics for the current sample N = 29) in the context of PChem II. There were six factors applied to this research as follows (1) confidence in learning physical chemistry, (2) satisfaction, (3) relevance, (4) personal ability, (5) gender difference, and (6) interest. 

This study is limited in terms of sample size. A larger sample size would lead to more informative statistics such as a full cycle of exploratory factor analysis and ANOVA analysis with advanced post hoc comparisons. 

Brown, T., Onsman, A. (2013). Exploratory factor analysis A five-step guide for novices. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, S(3), 1-14. Retrieved from http //ro.ecu.edu.au/jephc/ vol8/iss3/l. 

Unlike the theory-generating model found in exploratory factors analysis, CFA is a theory-testing model in which the researcher begins with an a priori hypothesis that specifies which variables are correlated with which factors and which factors are correlated with each other. The hypothesized relationships among the nine constructs and intent to leave were based on a strong theoretical foundation from prior research. 

---