Experimental methods mass concentration

We hope that this chapter on the molecular weight determination of synthetic polymers has illustrated that in the case of a complex polymer it is preferable to use several experimental methods for the molecular weight determination to obtain a full picture. Owing to the different sensitivity of the various methods some are blind for low molar masses while others are blind at low concentrations. As exemplified, often scaling laws can be utilized to compare results of different methods and different sensitivities. 

Which experimental method should be used depends on the type of reactor and how it will be operated, and if clean or process water is to be used for the measurement. Nonsteady state methods are generally simpler and faster to perform if kLa is to be determined in clean water without reaction. For processes that are operated at steady state with a reaction, determination of kLa using steady state methods are preferred, since continuous-flow processes need not be interrupted and operating conditions similar to the normal process conditions can be used. This is especially important for systems with reactions because the reaction rate is usually dependent on the concentration of the reactants present. They are thus often applied for investigations of the mass transfer coefficient under real process conditions with chemical reactions kLa(02) or biological activity kLa(02), e. g. in waste water treatment systems. 

The packed bed breakthrough method for investigation of mass transfer phenomena in sorbent systems can in many instances offer certain advantages not found in other experimental methods. The method is especially useful when the adsorption isotherms for the principal sorbate exhibit favorable curvature (convex toward loading axis). In such a case, there is the potential for a portion of the sorption front to approach a stable wave form (shape of the front invariant with time). Given the existence of a stable or "steady-state" mass transfer zone (MTZ) and a detailed knowledge of the equilibrium loading characteristics within that zone, one can extract local values of the effective mass transfer resistance at any concentration in the zone. 

Further, accurate measurement of the small physical effects observed at small concentration of polymer calls for sensitive experimental methods. An addition complication arises from the different types of molar mass averages obtained by different methods. 

In many cases, a priori estimates of the film thickness f cannot be made, and we resort to empirical methods of estimating the mass transfer coefficients. Most published experimental works have concentrated on two component systems and there are no correlations for the multicomponent [/ ]. The need to estimate multicomponent mass transfer coefficients is very real, however. The question is How can we estimate multicomponent mass transfer coefficients when all we have to go on are binary correlations In this section we look at the various methods that have been proposed to answer this question. 

Bulk diffusion into adhesive Joints has been studied considerably [9], however little work has focused on diffusion at adhesive interfaces, largely because of the limitations of experimental techniques. Mass uptake experiments are a convenient method to study fluid absorption in adhesives. This method has been used to study interfacial diffusion by comparing the relative rates of diffusion from non-bonded or free-standing films with diffusion into the actual adhesive joint [10,11]. A disadvantage of mass uptake experiments is that the method does not provide any direct evidence of the concentration of fluid at the interface. 

The key point is that, in general, the phase behavior of a given reaction system wiU not be known prior to the development of that process. Moreover, in those cases where data are available in the literature, they often refer to mixtures far more dilute than would be used in a commercial process. In such a process, energy and plant costs will clearly dictate that the reaction mixture should contain the minimum amount of SCF (see Beckman s constraint 2 e). This contrasts with SCF extraction, where the concentration of the extract dissolved in the SCF is determined, at least in part, by the mass-transport kinetics on the matrix material. All of these factors mean that the phase behavior of the reaction mixture wiU usuaUy have to be determined by experimental methods. 

Experimental methods for parameter estimation. In order to determine the relative importance of mass transport processes in gas/liquid/solid-reactions, it is recommended to measure the global reaction rate as function of catalyst concentration m (keeping all other operating variables constant). With the assumption of spherical catalyst particles, the specific surface of the catalyst can be calculated as... 

The consumption coefficient (f) can be numerically estimated from experimental data on growth, as shown in Fig. 5.19. The concept of a critical cell mass concentration is used, and it is determined by numerical methods from the plot of Fig. 5.19. The basic concept of the Kono approach is that reaction order changes at x nt following the general growth equation... 

The frequency of ion suppression or other deleterious effects can be evaluated by different experimental methods. The most common method is the comparison of the instrument response for an injected sample prepared in the mobile phase to the same concentration added to a preextracted blank sample matrix. The second method involves postcolumn continuous infusion of the compound into the MS instrument In the third method, standard line slope comparison is also used to evaluate ion suppres-sion. FuU-scan mass spectra can also be a useful method to study what impurities (in the blank of extracted sample matrix or in the LC mobile phase) are responsible for ion suppression and to try to remove these compounds. 

Experimental methods for the determination of the transport coefficients of low-molar-mass substances in polymers have been well established for a long time (for an overview see Ref. 29). Complications arise due to the often observed dependence of solubility and diffiisivity on solute concentration in the polymer [8, 29, 30] however, for the lightest gases the diffudvity is often indej ident of concentration in the pressure range of exf rimental interest, and for the purpose of determination of the fundamental mechanisms of solubility and diffiisivity pursued here, and for comparison with computer simulations, the limit of low concentration is sufficient. There, the transport coefficients are independent of penetrant concentration. The solubility is given by... 

Adsorption from solution measurements are obviously facilitated if an instrumental technique (e.g. a spectrophotometer or refractometer) can be used to follow the change in solute concentration. However, it is not always easy to achieve high accuracy and reproducibility, and it is therefore necessary to take account of a number of practical considerations and precautions The traditional experimental method is to add a known mass of the solid to a measured amount of solution of known composition. The container is then sealed and subjected to some form of agitation (shaking or preferably tumbling), whilst being held at constant temperature. Samples of the supernatant liquid are withdrawn and analysed. In such an experiment it is not easy to establish whether equilibrium has been established and in fact this may take from one hour to a few days Problems may also arise in the separation of the adsorbent and the supernatant liquid. The procedure is laborious and cumbersome, because a fresh sample is required for the determination of each point on the isotherm. 

---