Estimating Unknown Concentrations

Cahbration is an important focus in analytical chemistry. It is the process that relates instmment responses to chemical concentrations. It consists of two basic steps estimation of the cahbration model parameters, and then prediction for new samples of unknown concentration. Cahbration refers to the step of the analytical process in Figure 2 where measurements are related to concentrations of chemical species or other chemical information. 

The data in the validation set are used to challenge the calibration. We treat the validation samples as if they are unknowns. We use the calibration developed with the training set to predict (or estimate) the concentrations of the components in the validation samples. We then compare these predicted concentrations to the actual concentrations as determined by an independent referee method (these are also called the expected concentrations). In this way, we can assess the expected performance of the calibration on actual unknowns. To the extent that the validation samples are a good representation of all the unknown samples we will encounter, this validation step will provide a reliable estimate of the calibration s performance on the unknowns. But if we encounter unknowns that are significantly different from the validation samples, we are likely to be surprised by the actual performance of the calibration (and such surprises are seldom pleasant). 

Ideally, to characterize the spatial distribution of pollution, one would like to know at each location x within the site the probability distribution of the unknown concentration p(x). These distributions need to be conditional to the surrounding available information in terms of density, data configuration, and data values. Most traditional estimation techniques, including ordinary kriging, do not provide such probability distributions or "likelihood of the unknown values pC c). Utilization of these likelihood functions towards assessment of the spatial distribution of pollutants is presented first then a non-parametric method for deriving these likelihood functions is proposed. 

Prediction limits for the estimation of an unknown concentration x, can be calculated. The calculation depends on the specific multivariate calibration model... 

Levinsky et al. (1970) reported on three men exposed to an unknown concentration of arsine for an estimated, 2, 3, and 15 min. Signs and symptoms of exposure (malaise, headache, abdominal pain, chills, nausea, vomiting, oliguria/ anuria, hematuria, bronze skin color) developed within 1-2 h. All three individuals required extensive medical intervention to save their lives. Clinical findings were indicative of massive hemolysis and repeated blood exchange transfusions were necessary for the survival of these individuals. 

Traditional macroscale NIR spectroscopy requires a calibration set, made of the same chemical components as the target sample, but with varying concentrations that are chosen to span the range of concentrations possible in the sample. A concentration matrix is made from the known concentrations of each component. The PLS algorithm is used to create a model that best describes the mathematical relationship between the reference sample data and the concentration matrix. The model is applied to the unknown data from the target sample to estimate the concentration of sample components. This is called concentration mode PLS . 

Fundamental Parameters (FP) are universal standardless, factory built-in calibration programs that describe the physics of the detector s response to pure elements, correction factors for overlapping peaks, and a number of other parameters to estimate element concentration while theoretically correcting for matrix discrepancies (e.g., Figure 1987). FP should be used for accurately measuring samples of unknown chemical composition in which concentrations of light and heavy elements may vary from ppm to high percent levels. 

The purpose of a calibration line is to use it to estimate the concentration of an unknown sample when it is presented to the instrument. This is achieved by inverting the calibration equation to make x the subject. For an indication Jo,... 

When the standard curve has been established and the LLOQ and ULOQ validated, the assessment of unknown concentrations by extrapolation is not allowed beyond the validated range. The most accurate and precise estimates of concentration is in the linear portion of the curve even if acceptable quantitative results can be obtained up to the boundary of the curve using a quadratic model. For a linear model, statistic calculations suggest a minimum of six concentrations evenly placed along the entire range assayed in duplicate [5,7,8]. 

Problem 5 and estimate the concentration of unknown protein in the sample in /xg/mL. 

Upper respiratory irritation has been observed in humans at estimated exposure levels of between 0.039 and 0.378 mg silver/m for less than 1 to greater than 10 years. Evidence that silver colloid can act as an irritant is provided by the fact that ultrastructural damage was seen in the tracheal epithelium of rabbits following inhalation exposure to an unknown concentration of silver colloid. However, these effects are likely to be related to the caustic properties of the compounds, not to the presence of silver. The effects are not expected to persist when exposure to air containing silver compounds has stopped. 

Principal component regression is accomplished in two steps, a calibration step and an unknown prediction step. In the calibration step, concentrations of the constituent(s) to be quantitated in each calibration standard sample are assembled into a matrix, y, and mean-centered. Spectra of standards are measured, assembled into a matrix X, mean-centered, and then an SVD is performed. Calibration spectra are projected onto the d principal components (basis vectors) retained and are used to determine a vector of regression coefficients that can be then used to estimate the concentration of the calibrated constituent(s). 

Overfitting the PCR calibration model is easily accomplished by including too many factors. For this reason, it is very important to use test data to judge the performance of the calibration model. The test data set should be obtained from standards or samples prepared independently from the calibration data set. These test standards are treated as pseudo-unknown samples. In other words, the final PCR calibration model is used to estimate the concentration of these test samples. Using the harmonious approach noted in Figure 5.14 significantly reduces the chance of obtaining an overfitted model. 

DTLD yields even more accurate and precise results than GRAM. Table 12.3 presents the predicted analyte concentrations for the three standards and three unknowns. The estimated standard concentrations are accurate to less than 0.1% of the true analyte concentration. Prediction errors for the mixture samples are, in general, a factor of 2 to 4 less than the prediction errors realized by GRAM. The largest prediction error, for the least concentrated sample, is only 3.25%. This is compared with an average prediction error of 11% with the best application of GRAM. 

Copper(II) sulfate, CuS04, is a soluble salt. It is sometimes added to pools and ponds to control the growth of fungi. Solutions of this salt are blue in colour. The intensity of the colour increases with increased concentration. In this investigation, you will prepare copper(II) sulfate solutions with known concentrations. Then you will estimate the concentration of an unknown solution by comparing its colour intensity with the colour intensities of the known solutions. 

Use your observations to estimate the concentration of the unknown solution. 

A solution contains an unknown amount of table salt dissolved in water. List as many ways as you can think of to measure or estimate the concentration of salt in the solution without leaving the kitchen of your home. The only instruments you are allowed to bring home from work are a thermometer that covers the range - 10°C to 120°C and a small laboratory balance. (Example Make up several solutions with known salt concentrations, and compare their tastes with that of the unknown solution.)... 

This method is used for estimating analyte concentrations by immunoassay with maximum precision. Serial dilutions of a standard analyte solution are prepared and assayed serial dilutions of the unknown are also prepared and assayed. Responses from both dilution series are plotted against log10 of the dilution factor, as shown in Figure 16.6. 

---