Error reference books

Whatever style of notebook is used, the principle is the same Record all data directly in your notebook. Data may be copied into tlie notebook from a partner s notebook in those cases where it is clearly impossible for both partners to record data at the same time. Even then, a carbon copy or a photocopy of the original pages is better, since it avoids copying errors and saves time. In particular, do not use odd scraps of paper to record such incidental data as weights, barometer readings, and temperatures with the idea of copying them into the notebook at a later time. If anything must be copied from another source (calibration chart, reference book, etc.), identify it with an appropriate reference. 

Several textbooks and reference books (e.g., the third edition of Perry s Handbook, 1950) use this example to illustrate azeotropic distillation. They show the solution sketched in Fig. 11 for a feed whose composition is about 60% -butanol. If we analyze this configuration, we see that it separates the mixture. The same textbooks suggest that for a feed below the azeotropic composition, one should use the same configuration but put the feed into the decanter. The question that occurs immediately is How was this configuration selected Was it a trial-and-error procedure, or is there some way to find it directly ... 

This book is a tool for the legal, medical, scientific and political professions and should not be misconstrued as a cookbook . Publisher and author take no responsibility for inaccuracies, omissions, or typographical errors. References and sources are included for those seeking unedited detailed descriptions on the construction of any specific molecule. All chemicals and reactions are potentially toxic, explosive lethal. Check NTP and OSHA databases for toxicology data. 

APhA reference books include the Handbook of Nonprescription Drugs, 13th Edition, Medication Errors, Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients, APhA Drug Treatment Protocols, and several texts to guide those engaged in compounding practice. 

As evident from an analysis of thermodynamic data (primarily of the enthalpies of formation and sublimation) listed for several hundreds of substances in a reference book [4], determination of these constants by the third-law method yields values more precise, on the average, by an order of magnitude than those obtained using the second-law method. This can be traced to A, H depending differently on random and systematic errors in determination of the true reactant temperature and measurement of the variables P, J, or k, a point which becomes obvious when comparing Eqs. 4.10-4.12 with Eq. 4.18 below... 

Suppose a chemist synthesizes an analytical reagent that is believed to be entirely new. The compound is studied using a spectrometric method and gives a value of 104 (normally, most of our results will be cited in carefully chosen units, but in this hypothetical example purely arbitrary units can be used). From suitable reference books, the chemist finds that no compoimd previously discovered has yielded a value of more than 100 when studied by the same method under the same experimental conditions. The question thus naturally arises, has our chemist really discovered a new compound The answer to this question evidently lies in the degree of reliance that we can place on that experimental value of 104. What errors are associated with it If further study indicates that the result is correct to within 2 (arbitrary) units, i.e. the true value probably lies in the range 104 2, then a new material has probably been discovered. If, however, investigations show that the error may amount to 10 units (i.e. 104 10), then it is quite likely that the true value is actually less than 100, in which case a new discovery is far from certain. So a knowledge of the experimental errors is crucial (in this case as in every other) to the proper interpretation of the results. In statistical terms this example would involve the comparison of the experimental result (104) with a reference value (100) this topic is studied in detail in Chapter 3. 

The reference book (1944) values were found to be in considerable error, being based on the work of Antropoff (1910). " It was intimated that several authors (Lannung, 1930 " Valentiner, 1930 Van Liempt and Van Wijk, 1937 ), including von Antropoff himself (1919), have shown these values to be in error. The values for neon given by Lannung and Valentiner differed so much that it appeared difficult to decide which is the more reliable. 

Again, the specific heat terms can be easily integrated, but the error is quite small in assuming constant specific heats at an average temperature. The entropy of formation at 1 atm pressure is available in thermodynamics reference books and the Appendix. Plugging in the numbers we find that... 

There are numerous articles and references on computational research studies. If none exist for the task at hand, the researcher may have to guess which method to use based on its assumptions. It is then prudent to perform a short study to verify the method s accuracy before applying it to an unknown. When an expert predicts an error or best method without the benefit of prior related research, he or she should have a fair amount of knowledge about available options A savvy researcher must know the merits and drawbacks of various methods and software packages in order to make an informed choice. The bibliography at the end of this chapter lists sources for reviewing accuracy data. Appendix A of this book provides short reviews of many software packages. 

Carra and Forni (1974) derived the criteria that Carberry (1976) referred to in his book. These are equivalent to the original derivation of Aris and Amundson (1958). The notation is easier to understand and closer to the notation in this book. Eliminating some typographical errors, the criteria are ... 

In subsequent chapters, the various theories, tools, and techniques required to turn the systems approach from a concept to a practical error reduction methodology will be described. The components of this methodology are described in Figure 1.7. Each of these components will now be described in turn, together with references to the appropriate sections of the book. 

The answer to this question will depend on two factors the frequency with which the CT occur, and the likelihood of errors arising when performing these tasks. The frequency of the interactions can usually be specified relatively easily by reference to plant procedures, production plans, and maintenance schedules. The probability of error will be a fimction of the PIFs discussed extensively in Chapter 3 and other chapters in this book. In order to obtain a measure of error potential, it is necessary to make an assessment of the most important PIFs for each of the CT. 

The determination of errors in the slope a and the intercept b of the regression line together with multiple and curvilinear regression is beyond the scope of this book but references may be found in the Bibliography, page 156. 

Due to the large demand, a second edition of this book had to be prepared only about one year after the original text appeared. In the present edition we have corrected all errors that came to our attention and we have included new references where appropriate. The discussion has been brought up-to-date at various places in order to document significant recent developments. 

Finally, recent work of Iversen et al. has carefully examined the bias associated to the accumulation of the error on low-order reflexions, and attempted a correction of the MaxEnt density [39]. The study, based on a number of noisy data sets generated with Monte Carlo simulations, has produced less non-uniform distribution of residuals, and has given quantitative estimate of the bias introduced by the uniform prior prejudice. For more details on this work, we refer the reader to the chapter by Iversen that appears in this same book. 

We are very much indebted to the Series Editor, Robert W. Cahn, for his patience, continuous encouragement and precious suggestions. The responsibility for any errors in the book is naturally ours. However, the prestige and competence of R. W. Cahn have been an important point of reference and guidance. His scientific contributions to Materials and Intermetallics Science, his teaching and organizing ability have established an authoritative scientific activity in which we are very proud to be involved. 

Grammar refers to the hundreds of rules that govern sentences. Space confines limit this book s discussion of those rules to three of the most common errors ... 

---