Typographical errors

The Notice of Errors. The first mechanism for correction of errors is called a "Notice of Errors." This document may be filed by the patentee after issuance of the patent with the U.S. PTO and references the patent number, issue date, and the errors contained in the patent. The purpose of a Notice of Errors is to clarify the examination history of the patent and such notice dispositively corrects any misspellings, or typographical errors or omissions. One example of a problem which may be clarified by a Notice of Errors is an omitted chemical bond in a compound used in an exemplary embodiment of the invention. In short, the error is obvious and easily corrected. 

For single rings (i.e. mononuclear systems) up to ten atoms in size, there is no question but that Hantzsch-Widman names are overwhelmingly the most widely used, and specialists can be presumed to recognize them readily. However, when one of the trivial names of Table 1 can be used, it prevails almost exclusively. Thiophene will be immediately understood by specialists and most nonspecialists, whereas thiole will distract the reader s attention from the chemistry while he considers the writer s intention is the Hantzsch-Widman system indeed being used, or is it a typographical error Chemical Abstracts also uses these trivial names in its indexes. 

Carra and Forni (1974) derived the criteria that Carberry (1976) referred to in his book. These are equivalent to the original derivation of Aris and Amundson (1958). The notation is easier to understand and closer to the notation in this book. Eliminating some typographical errors, the criteria are ... 

Dnick-farbe, /. printing color, printing ink. -fehler, m. misprint, typographical error. 

This appears to be a typographical error in the original paper. Data for FeClj as catalyst. 

Below, the final expressions of the ZN formulas that can be directly applied to practical problems are summarized. Note that there are some typographical errors in the expressions given in Refs. [1] and [13]. The necessary corrections are explained in Ref. [2]. The whole set of correct expressions are provided here. 

Caution should be exercised when taking data from the literature, as typographical errors often occur. If a value looks doubtful it should be cross-checked in an independent reference, or by estimation. 

The required group overlap integrals have been evaluated by Dunitz and Orgel (i 7), and are given by the expressions (correcting one minor typographical error),... 

We keep learning more about the history of noise calculations. It seems that the topic of the noise of a spectrum in the constant-detector-noise case was addressed more than 50 years ago [1], Not only that, but it was done while taking into account the noise of the reference readings. The calculation of the optimum absorbance value was performed using several different criteria for optimum . One of these criteria, which Cole called the Probable Error Method, gives the same results that we obtained for the optimum transmittance value of 32.99%T [2], Cole s approach, however, had several limitations. The main one, from our point of view, is the fact that he directed his equations to represent the absorbance noise as soon as possible in his derivation. Thus his derivation, as well as virtually all the ones since then, bypassed consideration of the behavior of noise of transmittance spectra. This, coupled with the fact that the only place we have found that presented an expression for transmittance noise had a typographical error as we reported in our previous column [3], means that as far as we know, the correct expression for the behavior of transmittance noise has still never been previously reported in the literature. On the other hand, we do have to draw back a bit and admit that the correct expression for the optimum transmittance has been reported. 

Since the coefficients are being computed by the computer, there is no chance for typographical errors occurring in the coefficients. 

---