Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Equipment Electrochemical interface

AC impedance measurements were carried out on 300 0.m thick polymer electrolyte samples, with n=16 and an exposed area of 0.20 cm, using a Pt/PEGi6Mg(CI04)2/Pt cell configuration results for the other molar ratios will be reported later. Regarding the experimental set-up, major equipment included a Schlumberger 1255 HF Frequency Response Analyser, electrochemically interfaced to a Western Systems 486 PC via a PAR 273A... [Pg.226]

For a correct use of this method, which can be applied using either the three-wire or the four-wire technique, the electric characteristics of the equipment must be examined very carefully in order to define the experimental procedures. In principle, no problems are encountered if use is made of potentiostats like EG G s mods. 173 and 273 or of the Solartron mod. 1286 electrochemical interface. The electrochemical system, however, must be polarized by means of a current square wave of such duration as to permit the polarization potential to reach a steady-state value. [Pg.406]

The two codes, written in basic language for an Apple He computer, use the galvano-static mode and drive, respectively, the Solartron mod. 1286 electrochemical interface and the EG G mod. 173 potentiostat, which is equipped with a mod. 276 interface. In both cases use is made of a Solartron mod. 1250 frequency response analyzer. [Pg.410]

On three-electrode cells, i.e. cells equipped with working electrode, counterelectrode, and reference electrode (WE, CE, and RE) under potentiostatic or galvanostatic control. In this case, the small ac signal is superimposed on a dc polarization. The measurement requires au electrochemical interface (potentiostat or galvanostat) coupled to an FRA (see Section 3.2). [Pg.235]

In order for STM to work with electrochemical interfaces, the instrument is equipped with a bipotentiostat for independent potential control of both the tip and surface with respect to a chosen reference electrode in a four-electrode cell, so that both electrodes are under well-defined electrochemical conditions. Furthermore, since Faradaic current could also flow through the tip electrode, this would be superimposed on the tunneling current and interfere severely with the detection of tunneling current, and even destabilize the geometry of the tip apex. It is therefore essential to insulate the side wall of the metallic tip electrode to suppress the Faradaic current while leaving a small tip apex for tunneling [7,8]. [Pg.166]

It is the aim of this chapter to explain the basic requirements for performing electrochemistry, such as equipment, electrodes, electrochemical cells and boundary conditions to be respected. The following chapter focuses on the basic theory of charge transfer at the electrode-electrolyte solution interface and at transport phenomena of the analyte towards the electrode surface. In Chapter3, a theoretical overview of the electrochemical methods applied in the work described in this book is given. [Pg.9]

The detection and identification of phenolic compounds, including phenolic acids, have also been simph-fied using mass spectrometry (MS) techniques on-hne, coupled to the HPLC equipment. The electrospray ionization (ESI) and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) interfaces dominate the analysis of phenohcs in herbs, fmits, vegetables, peels, seeds, and other plants. In some cases, HPLC, with different sensitivity detectors (UV, electrochemical, fluorescence), and HPLC-MS are simultaneously used for the identification and determination of phenolic acids in natural plants and related food products.In some papers, other spectroscopic instmmental techniques (IR, H NMR, and C NMR) have also been apphed for the identification of isolated phenolic compounds. [Pg.1170]

SECM instruments suitable for imaging require a PC equipped with an interface board to synchronize acquisition of the electrochemical data with the movement of the tip. Building an SECM for kinetic experiments at fixed tip position or approach curve measurements is relatively easy, but fairly sophisticated software and some electronic work is necessary to construct a computer-controlled apparatus for imaging applications. Details on the construction of SECM instruments can be found elsewhere [6, 13-18, 53, 55]. An SECM is now available commercially from CH Instruments, Inc. (Austin, TX, USA). The instrument employs piezoelectric actuators, a three-axis stage, and a bipotentiostat controlled by an external PC under a 32-bit Windows environment. Various standard electrochemical techniques are incorporated along with SECM imaging, approach curves, and the modes described in Sect. 3.3.I.I. [Pg.450]

TR in potential modulation experiments is limited to 10 -10 s by the response of the thin-layer cell and, in the case of ATR, to 10 s by the response of the electrochemical equipment, especially the potentiostat (0.5-10 p,s) [478] and the A/D converter [473] used. The first millisecond time-resolved IR spectra of an ultrathin film at the electrode-electrolyte interface were also measured with a dispersive spectrometer by repetitive measurements of IR absorption at fixed wavenumbers and conversion of the data into TR spectra [623]. The disadvantage of this technique was long collection times (on the order of a few tens of hours). [Pg.388]

To be able to investigate the hydrodynamics of the system, the device was additionally equipped with a video camera (SONY, Japan) for observations of the displacement of tracer particles located at the gas-liquid interface. The experimental system could be also adapted for direct measuring of the mass transfer rate across the interface in the presence of the active phospholipid monolayer. For that purpose, the electrochemical system was developed [1], where the oxygen flux across the interface could be determined by the measurement of the electric current intensity. The results of experimental investigations will be presented in the further part of the paper. [Pg.284]

The cell voltage Ucell is defined as the potential difference between the cathode and the anode. It is usually measured during fuel-ceU operation. The potential difference between the electrode and the electrolyte, which is caUed the anode or cathode potential in the following, is responsible for the electrochemical reaction occurring within the catalyst layers but cannot be measured directly. In the further text, we use electrolyte and membrane as equivalent expressions. While the electrode potential can be sensed from the bipolar plates, it is not feasible to sense the membrane potential directly, since each measurement equipment forms an interface between the membrane and the metal contact Two methods for the installation of a reference electrode within the ceU have been discussed in the Hterature, namely the reverse hydrogen electrode (RHE) [18] and the dynamic hydrogen electrode (DHE). In addition to ceU internal methods, a conventional... [Pg.546]

Unlike the situation at a solid/electrolyte interface where a three-electrode system is used, four- and two-electrode systems have been widely employed for large and small liquid/ liquid interfaces. Most of the four-electrode potentiostats are homemade and only a few instruments with such functions have been commercialized (98). This is probably one of the reasons why this field has not been very popular since most electrochemical laboratories are equipped with a three-electrode potentiostat. In 1998, Anson et al. reported that charge transfer reactions at a liquid/liquid interface could also be studied by a three-electrode system with a thin-layer cell (99,1(X)). Later, Scholz et al. reported a three-phase junction setup (101, 102). Shao et al. supported a small droplet of aqueous solution (pL) containing a certain concentration ratio of redox couples on a Pt surface and demonstrated that charge transfer could be studied by a three-electrode setup (103). Girault et al. extended this to a supported small droplet of aqueous (organic) phase on the surface of... [Pg.801]


See other pages where Equipment Electrochemical interface is mentioned: [Pg.162]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.627]    [Pg.631]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.554]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.631]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.652]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.861]    [Pg.1070]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.913]    [Pg.187]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.33 , Pg.97 , Pg.163 , Pg.172 , Pg.207 , Pg.220 , Pg.327 ]




SEARCH



Interfaces electrochemical

© 2024 chempedia.info