Enzyme immobilization surfaces

Immobilized Enzymes. The immobilized enzyme electrode is the most common immobilized biopolymer sensor, consisting of a thin layer of enzyme immobilized on the surface of an electrochemical sensor as shown in Figure 6. The enzyme catalyzes a reaction that converts the target substrate into a product that is detected electrochemicaHy. The advantages of immobilized enzyme electrodes include minimal pretreatment of the sample matrix, small sample volume, and the recovery of the enzyme for repeated use (49). Several reviews and books have been pubHshed on immobilized enzyme electrodes (50—52). 

The immobilization procedure may alter the behavior of the enzyme (compared to its behavior in homogeneous solution). For example, the apparent parameters of an enzyme-catalyzed reaction (optimum temperature or pH, maximum velocity, etc.) may all be changed when an enzyme is immobilized. Improved stability may also accrue from the minimization of enzyme unfolding associated with the immobilization step. Overall, careful engineering of the enzyme microenvironment (on the surface) can be used to greatly enhance the sensor performance. More information on enzyme immobilization schemes can be found in several reviews (7,8). 

The choice of immobilization strategy obviously depends on the enzyme, electrode surface, and fuel properties, and on whether a mediator is required, and a wide range of strategies have been employed. Some general examples are represented in Fig. 17.4. Key goals are to stabilize the enzyme under fuel cell operating conditions and to optimize both electron transfer and the efficiency of fuel/oxidant mass transport. Here, we highlight a few approaches that have been particularly useful in electrocatalysis directed towards fuel cell applications. 

Quantitative analytical treatments of the effects of mass transfer and reaction within a porous structure were apparently first carried out by Thiele (20) in the United States, Dam-kohler (21) in Germany, and Zeldovitch (22) in Russia, all working independently and reporting their results between 1937 and 1939. Since these early publications, a number of different research groups have extended and further developed the analysis. Of particular note are the efforts of Wheeler (23-24), Weisz (25-28), Wicke (29-32), and Aris (33-36). In recent years, several individuals have also extended the treatment to include enzymes immobilized in porous media or within permselective membranes. The important consequence of these analyses is the development of a technique that can be used to analyze quantitatively the factors that determine the effectiveness with which the surface area of a porous catalyst is used. For this purpose we define an effectiveness factor rj for a catalyst particle as... 

One of the most promising applications of enzyme-immobilized mesoporous materials is as microscopic reactors. Galameau et al. investigated the effect of mesoporous silica structures and their surface natures on the activity of immobilized lipases [199]. Too hydrophilic (pure silica) or too hydrophobic (butyl-grafted silica) supports are not appropriate for the development of high activity for lipases. An adequate hydrophobic/hydrophilic balance of the support, such as a supported-micelle, provides the best route to enhance lipase activity. They also encapsulated the lipases in sponge mesoporous silicates, a new procedure based on the addition of a mixture of lecithin and amines to a sol-gel synthesis to provide pore-size control. 

The effectiveness of an enzyme immobilized on a porous spherical pellet is to be calclulated with = 5 and (f> - 4. The shooting method for solving Eq (1) of problem P8.04.15 is described in problem P7.03.09. Several trial values of f0 at the center and the corresponding values at the surface, fx and [df/dp)x> are tabulated. ODE is applied to the equivalent pair of equations... 

Immobilized enzymes may be used in affinity chromatographic methods but their use as catalysts may be in either the production or removal of compounds in chemical processes or as analytical tools. Many substrate assays can be performed using enzymes immobilized on a variety of surfaces, e.g. glass beads, plastic or nylon tubing. Alternatively they may be incorporated into gel or microparticulate layers on dry strips or slides. 

Because enzymes are insoluble in organic solvent, mass-transfer limitations apply as with any heterogeneous catalyst. Water-soluble enzymes (which represent the majority of enzymes currently used in biocatalysis) have hydrophilic surfaces and so tend to form aggregates or stick to reaction vessel walls rather than form the fine dispersions that are required for optimum efficiency. This can be overcome by enzyme immobilization, as discussed in Section 1.5. 

Conversely, controlled immobilization of enzymes at surfaces to enable high-rate direct electron transfer would eliminate the need for the mediator component and possibly lead to enhanced stability. Novel surface chemistries are required that allow protein immobilization with controlled orientation, such that a majority of active centers are within electrontunneling distance of the surface. Additionally, spreading of enzymes on the surfaces must be minimized to prevent deactivation due to irreversible changes in secondary structure. Finally, structures of controlled nanoporosity must be developed to achieve such surface immobilization at high volumetric enzyme loadings. 

Many different types of techniques for protein immobilization have been developed using, in most cases, enzyme sensors. Early studies of enzyme biosensors often employed thick polymer membranes (thickness 0.01-1 mm) in which enzymes are physically entrapped or chemically anchored. The electrode surface was covered with the enzyme-immobilized polymer membranes to prepare electrochemical enzyme sensors. Although these biosensors functioned appropriately to... 

At one extreme diffusivity may be so low that chemical reaction takes place only at suface active sites. In that case p is equal to the fraction of active sites on the surface of the catalyst. Such a polymer-supported phase transfer catalyst would have extremely low activity. At the other extreme when diffusion is much faster than chemical reaction p = 1. In that case the observed reaction rate equals the intrinsic reaction rate. Between the extremes a combination of intraparticle diffusion rates and intrinsic rates controls the observed reaction rates as shown in Fig. 2, which profiles the reactant concentration as a function of distance from the center of a spherical catalyst particle located at the right axis, When both diffusion and intrinsic reactivity control overall reaction rates, there is a gradient of reactant concentration from CAS at the surface, to a lower concentration at the center of the particle. The reactant is consumed as it diffuses into the particle. With diffusional limitations the active sites nearest the surface have the highest turnover numbers. The overall process of simultaneous diffusion and chemical reaction in a spherical particle has been described mathematically for the cases of ion exchange catalysis,63 65) and catalysis by enzymes immobilized in gels 66-67). Many experimental parameters influence the balance between intraparticle diffusional and intrinsic reactivity control of reaction rates with polymer-supported phase transfer catalysts, as shown in Fig. 1. 

Immobilization onto a solid support, either by surface attachment or lattice entrapment, is the more widely used approach to overcome enzyme inactivation, particularly interfacial inactivation. The support provides a protective microenvironment which often increases biocatalyst stability, although a decrease in biocata-lytic activity may occur, particularly when immobilization is by covalent bonding. Nevertheless, this approach presents drawbacks, since the complexity (and cost) of the system is increased, and mass transfer resistances and partition effects are enhanced [24]. For those applications where enzyme immobilization is not an option, wrapping up the enzyme with a protective cover has proved promising [21]. 

The literature contains numerous references to comparisons of enzymes immobilized on gel beads and polyurethanes. These immobilizations are surface effects and unless the data are normalized to the contact area, the comparisons are suspect. It is clear, however, that immobilization with polyurethane is the easiest of the known techniques. 

Fig. 37.5. Imaging of enzymes immobilized on electrode surfaces, (a) Ox-idoreductase immobilized on insulators (imaging and quantification possible) (b) oxidoreductase immobilized on conductor the feedback may be caused by the electrode or the enzymes and (c) GC mode experiment does not depend on the nature of the support surface.

TCNQ derivatives Phthalocyanine derivatives Enzyme immobilization on surfaces Radiation crosslinking Metal carbonyl derivatives Organosilicon derivatives... 

---