Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electronic axes

In addition, none of these calculations involve correlation of more than ten electrons, so no correlation effects from the core electrons axe included at all. Explicit inclusion of the core electrons at the CPF level was found to increase De by about 0.7 kcal/mol in calculations by Ahlrichs and co-workers [69], while in calculations by Almlof and co-workers [68] the same increase was obtained by a completely different technique (inclusion of only core-valence correlation effects, as described in Sec. 6.2). Hence it appeared safe to assume that core correlation would increase De by less than 1 kcal/mol. However, recent calculations by Werner and Knowles [70] give a larger effect of about 1.5 kcal/mol, so this question is not yet settled. [Pg.369]

Molecular orbital (MO) theory describes covalcm bund formation as aris ing from a mathematical combinatiim of atomic orbitols (wave functions) to form nuilecutar mi itata, so called because they belong to the entire molecule rather than to an individual atom. Just as an aUtmit orbital describes a region of space around an atom where an electron is likely to be found, so a mofrculor orbital describes a n on of space in a moleciflr where electrons axe most likely to be found. [Pg.34]

Referring to figure BLIP. 7 consider electrons from the event under study as well as from other events all arriving at the two detectors. The electrons from the event under study are correlated in time and result in a peak in the time spectrum centred approximately at the delay time. There is also a background level due to events that bear no fixed time relation to each other. If the average rate of tlie background events in each detector is R and i 2> then the rate that two such events will be recorded within time Ax is given by i g, where... [Pg.1429]

If the perturbations thus caused are relatively slight, the accepted perturbation theory can be used to interpret observed spectral changes (3,10,39). The spectral effect is calculated as the difference of the long-wavelength band positions for the perturbed and the initial dyes. In a general form, the band maximum shift, AX, can be derived from equation 4 analogous to the weU-known Hammett equation. Here p is a characteristic of an unperturbed molecule, eg, the electron density or bond order change on excitation or the difference between the frontier level and the level of the substitution. The other parameter. O, is an estimate of the perturbation. [Pg.494]

In the analysis of trace elements or thin films on substrate using electrons, however, one finds that the MDL, may be increased by choosing Eq such that Uis just greater than 1. The reason for this is that the k factor, which is the ratio of the intensity from the sample to that from the standard, increases as Uapproaches 1 for thin films. Thus, by maximizing the k factor, the sensitivity is increased. For bulk sample analysis, however, the k factor will usually be a maximum ax. U- 2.5. [Pg.129]

Flavin coenzymes can exist in any of three different redox states. Fully oxidized flavin is converted to a semiqulnone by a one-electron transfer, as shown in Figure 18.22. At physiological pH, the semiqulnone is a neutral radical, blue in color, with a A ax of 570 nm. The semiqulnone possesses a pAl of about 8.4. When it loses a proton at higher pH values, it becomes a radical anion, displaying a red color with a A ax of 490 nm. The semiqulnone radical is particularly stable, owing to extensive delocalization of the unpaired electron across the 77-electron system of the isoalloxazine. A second one-electron transfer converts the semiqulnone to the completely reduced dihydroflavin as shown in Figure 18.22. [Pg.591]

Wheland and Pauling (1959) tried to explain the inductive effect in terms of ar-electron theory by varying the ax and ySxY parameters for nearest-neighbour atoms, then for next-nearest-neighbour atoms and so on. But, as many authors have also pointed out, it is always easy to introduce yet more parameters into a simple model, obtain agreement with an experimental finding and then claim that the model represents some kind of absolute truth. [Pg.135]

Consider now the case where the perturbation A is a specific nuclear displacement, A"i Xk + AX t. The derivatives of the one- and two-electron integrals are of two types, those involving derivatives of the basis functions, and those involving derivatives of the operators. The latter are given as... [Pg.256]

Click Coached Problems for a self-study species have the general formulas AX2, AX3,..., AX It is understood that there are no unmodule on electron pair geometry. shared pairs around atom A. [Pg.176]

Figure 7.5 (page 177) shows the geometries predicted by the VSEPR model for molecules of the types AX2 to AX. The geometries for two and three electron pairs are those associated with species in which the central atom has less than an octet of electrons. Molecules of this type include BeF2 (in the gas state) and BF3, which have the Lewis structures shown below ... [Pg.176]

Strategy Draw the Lewis structure as a first step. Then decide what type (AX AX3, and so on) the molecule is, focusing on the central atom. Remember, X represents a terminal atom, F an unshared pair of electrons. [Pg.179]

STRATEGY We expect the uncertainty in the position of an object as heavy as a marble to be very small but the uncertainty in the speed of an electron, which has a very small mass and is confined to a small region, to be very large, (a) The uncertainty Ap is equal to mAv, where Av is the uncertainty in the speed we use Eq. 8 to estimate the minimum uncertainty in position, Ax, along the direction of the travel of the marble from ApAx = fi (the minimum value of the product of uncertainties), (b) We assume Ax to be the diameter of the atom and use Eq. 8 to estimate Ap by using the mass of the electron inside the back cover, we find Av from Ap = mAv. ... [Pg.139]

Bertini I, Luchinat C, Scozzafava A (1982) Carbonic Anhydrase An Insight into the Zinc Binding Site and into the Active Cavity Through Metal Substitution. 48 45-91 Bertrand P (1991) Application of Electron Transfer Theories to Biological Systems. 75 1-48 Bill E, see Trautwein AX (1991) 78 1-96 Bino A, see Ardon M (1987) 65 1-28 Blanchard M, see Linares C (1977) 33 179-207 Blasse G, see Powell RC (1980) 42 43-96... [Pg.242]

Not all nuclear transitions of this kind produce a detectable y-ray for a certain portion, the energy is dissipated by internal conversion to an electron of the K-shell which is ejected as a so-called conversion electron. For some Mossbauer isotopes, the total internal conversion coefficient ax is rather high, as for the 14.4 keV transition of Fe (ax = 8.17). ax is defined as the ratio of the number of conversion electrons to the number of y-photons. [Pg.8]

There are two general conclusions of importance. First, the distance r(Z- X), where Z is the electron donor atom/centre in the complex B- XY, is smaller than the sum of the van der Waals radii ax and ax of these atoms. This result has been shown [179] to be consistent with the conclusion that the van der Waals radius of the atom X in the dihalogen molecule X is shorter along the XY internuclear axis than it is perpendicular to it, i.e. there is a polar flattening of the atom X in the molecule XY of the type suggested by Stone et al. [180]. This result has been shown to hold for the cases XY = CI2 [174], BrCl [175], C1F [176] and IC1 [178], but not for F2, in which the F atom in the molecule appears (admittedly on the basis of only a few examples) to be more nearly spherical [177]. [Pg.57]

Table 8.1 Molecular structures of compounds AX Em. A = main group element, E = lone electron pair... Table 8.1 Molecular structures of compounds AX Em. A = main group element, E = lone electron pair...
If the single-electron mechanism has not been demonstrated to be the rate-controlling process by an independent method, then, in the publication of the experimental results, it is preferable to replace the assumed quantity ax by the conventional value cm, provided that the charge number of the overall reaction is known (e.g. in an overall two-electron reaction it is preferable to replace = 0.5 by or = 0.25). If the independence of the charge transfer coefficient on the potential has not been demonstrated for the given potential range, then it is useful to determine it for the given potential from the relation for a cathodic electrode reaction (cf. Eq. 5.2.37) ... [Pg.275]


See other pages where Electronic axes is mentioned: [Pg.347]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.565]    [Pg.580]    [Pg.609]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.686]    [Pg.807]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.509]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.647]    [Pg.605]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.11]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.77 ]




SEARCH



Transformation of the electronic coordinates to molecule-fixed axes

© 2024 chempedia.info