Electron density mapping

On the other hand the polarization of electron density map unsaturated carbonyl compounds makes their p carbon atoms rather electrophilic Some chemical conse quences of this enhanced electrophilicity are described m the following section... 

Extended Huckel provides the approximate shape and energy ordering of molecular orbitals. It also yields the approximate form of an electron density map. This is the only requirement for many qualitative applications of quantum mechanics calculations, such as Frontier Orbital estimates of chemical reactivity (see Frontier Molecular Orbitals on page 141). 

Step 11. At this point a computer program refines the atomic parameters of the atoms that were assigned labels. The atomic parameters consist of the three position parameters x,j, and for each atom. Also one or six atomic displacement parameters that describe how the atom is "smeared" (due to thermal motion or disorder) are refined for each atom. The atomic parameters are varied so that the calculated reflection intensities are made to be as nearly equal as possible to the observed intensities. During this process, estimated phase angles are obtained for all of the reflections whose intensities were measured. A new three-dimensional electron density map is calculated using these calculated phase angles and the observed intensities. There is less false detail in this map than in the first map. 

These stmctures tend to have a lot of disorder. It is rare that any hydrogens can be observed in the final electron density maps. In fact, many groups of atoms (water molecules and some side chains) may be so disordered that it is usually difficult to determine positions for these groups. 

The comparison with experiment can be made at several levels. The first, and most common, is in the comparison of derived quantities that are not directly measurable, for example, a set of average crystal coordinates or a diffusion constant. A comparison at this level is convenient in that the quantities involved describe directly the structure and dynamics of the system. However, the obtainment of these quantities, from experiment and/or simulation, may require approximation and model-dependent data analysis. For example, to obtain experimentally a set of average crystallographic coordinates, a physical model to interpret an electron density map must be imposed. To avoid these problems the comparison can be made at the level of the measured quantities themselves, such as diffraction intensities or dynamic structure factors. A comparison at this level still involves some approximation. For example, background corrections have to made in the experimental data reduction. However, fewer approximations are necessary for the structure and dynamics of the sample itself, and comparison with experiment is normally more direct. This approach requires a little more work on the part of the computer simulation team, because methods for calculating experimental intensities from simulation configurations must be developed. The comparisons made here are of experimentally measurable quantities. 

In general, the advantages of using an automated method may be comparable to those of SA refinement in X-ray crystallography [68], where many of the operations necessary to refine a structure can be done automatically and the remaining manual interventions are easier because the SA refinement usually results in a more easily interpreted electron density map. Automated methods are usually used in combination with manual assignment. However, fully automated assignment of the NOEs is possible (see Eig. 7) [69]. 

Figure 8.3 The DNA-binding protein Cro from bacteriophage lambda contains 66 amino acid residues that fold into three a helices and three P strands, (a) A plot of the Ca positions of the first 62 residues of the polypeptide chain. The four C-terminal residues are not visible in the electron density map. (b) A schematic diagram of the subunit structure. a helices 2 and 3 that form the helix-turn-helix motif ate colored blue and red, respectively. The view is different from that in (a), [(a) Adapted from W.F. Anderson et al., Nature 290 754-758, 1981. (b) Adapted from D. Ohlendorf et al., /. Mol. Biol. 169 757-769, 1983.]...

Figure 12.3 Two-dimensional crystals of the protein bacteriorhodopsin were used to pioneer three-dimensional high-resolution structure determination from electron micrographs. An electron density map to 7 A resolution (a) was obtained and interpreted in terms of seven transmembrane helices (b).

Deisenhofer, J., et al. X-ray structure analysis of a membrane protein complex. Electron density map at 3 A resolution and a model of the chromophores of the photosynthetic reaction center from Rhodopseudomonas viridis. f. Mol. Biol. 180 385-398, 1984. 

The outer diameter of the shell is approximately 180 A and the inner diameter about 125 A except around the threefold axes, where the N-ter-minal a helices project about 20 A into the core. The RNA molecule that is present in the core is not visible in the electron density map. 

The amplitudes and the phases of the diffraction data from the protein crystals are used to calculate an electron-density map of the repeating unit of the crystal. This map then has to be interpreted as a polypeptide chain with a particular amino acid sequence. The interpretation of the electron-density map is complicated by several limitations of the data. First of all, the map itself contains errors, mainly due to errors in the phase angles. In addition, the quality of the map depends on the resolution of the diffraction data, which in turn depends on how well-ordered the crystals are. This directly influences the image that can be produced. The resolution is measured in A... 

Figure 18.11 Electron-density maps at different resolution show more detail at higher resolution, (a) At low resolution (5.0 A) individual groups of atoms are not resolved, and only the rodlike feature of an

Figure 18.12 The electron-density map is interpreted by fitting into it pieces of a polypeptide chain with known stereochemistry such as peptide groups and phenyl rings. The electron density (blue) is displayed on a graphics screen in combination with a part of the polypeptide chain (red) in an arbitrary orientation (a). The units of the polypeptide chain can then be rotated and translated relative to the electron density until a good fit is obtained (b). Notice that individual atoms are not resolved in such electron densities, there are instead lumps of density corresponding to groups of atoms. [Adapted from A. Jones Methods Enzym. (eds. H.W. Wyckoff, C.H. Hirs, and S.N. Timasheff) 115B 162, New York Academic Press, 1985.]...

The three-dimensional structure of protein molecules can be experimentally determined by two different methods, x-ray crystallography and NMR. The interaction of x-rays with electrons in molecules arranged in a crystal is used to obtain an electron-density map of the molecule, which can be interpreted in terms of an atomic model. Recent technical advances, such as powerful computers including graphics work stations, electronic area detectors, and... 

In our study of the hydrogen molecule-ion in Chapter 3, we considered the electron density map shown in Figure 18.8. It is obvious by inspection that the... 

X-Ray diffraction from single crystals is the most direct and powerful experimental tool available to determine molecular structures and intermolecular interactions at atomic resolution. Monochromatic CuKa radiation of wavelength (X) 1.5418 A is commonly used to collect the X-ray intensities diffracted by the electrons in the crystal. The structure amplitudes, whose squares are the intensities of the reflections, coupled with their appropriate phases, are the basic ingredients to locate atomic positions. Because phases cannot be experimentally recorded, the phase problem has to be resolved by one of the well-known techniques the heavy-atom method, the direct method, anomalous dispersion, and isomorphous replacement.1 Once approximate phases of some strong reflections are obtained, the electron-density maps computed by Fourier summation, which requires both amplitudes and phases, lead to a partial solution of the crystal structure. Phases based on this initial structure can be used to include previously omitted reflections so that in a couple of trials, the entire structure is traced at a high resolution. Difference Fourier maps at this stage are helpful to locate ions and solvent molecules. Subsequent refinement of the crystal structure by well-known least-squares methods ensures reliable atomic coordinates and thermal parameters. 

Two helices are packed antiparallel in the orthorhombic unit cell. Association of the helices occurs through a series of periodic carboxylate potassium water - carboxylate interactions. An axial projection of the unit-cell contents (Fig. 23b) shows that the helices and guest molecules are closely packed. This is the first crystal structure of a polysaccharide in which all the guest molecules in the unit cell, consistent with the measured fiber density, have been experimentally located from difference electron-density maps. The final / -value is 0.26 for 54 reflections, of which 43 are observed, and it is based on normal scattering factors.15... 

Molecular replacement is where the phases of a known structure are used to determine the structure of a protein that may be identical but crystallized in a different space group or may adopt essentially the same structure (e.g., a homologous protein). Essentially, the calculations find the rotation and translation of the molecule that work with the phases to produce an interpretable electron density map. 

Oldfield TJ. Pattern-recognition methods to identify secondary structure within X-ray crystallographic electron-density maps. Acta Cryst. 2002 058 487-93. 

Oldfield TJ. Automated tracing of electron-density maps of proteins. Acta Cryst 2003 059 483-91. 

---