Electrochemical tests measured parameters

Standard test procedures are defined within ASTM standards ASTM G 59, Practice for Conducting Potentiodynamic Polarization Resistance Measurements G 5, "Standard Reference Test Method for Making Potentiostatic and Potentiodynamic Anodic Polarization Measurements G 106, Practice for Verification of Algorithm and Equipment for Electrochemical Impedance Measurements and G 102, Practice for Calculation of Corrosion Rates and Related Information from Electrochemical Measurements. Each of these methods describes a standard procedure or practice for the test method. A complete discussion of the technologies is beyond the scope of the current text. For the current text, the focus is on the application of the most simple and most widely used of these techniques, the polarization resistance measurement, ASTM G 59. The parameters discussed are, however, applicable concerns for all electrochemical tests. 

Electrochemical tests are rapid techniques to determine mechanisms, determine the effect of various parameters on corrosion rate, and screen out a large number of materials [43]. They usually involve measurement of corrosion potentials, corrosion currents, polarization curves, and electrochemical impedance. They are used to evaluate metals and alloys and the behavior of metallic, inorganic, and oiganic coatings. The simplest test involves the measurement of the corrosion potential and its use in conjunction with other measurements. A zero resistance ammeter (ZRA) is commonly used to measure corrosion currents between dissimilar metals and alloys. Controlled potentitd tests and anodic and cathodic polarization curves using potentiostats are the most commonly used electrochemical tests. These are powerful tools for investigating the effect of various parameters on corrosion behavior. These incorporate the use of cycUc polarization and polarization resistance for localized corrosion and corrosion rate measurements. Table 4 lists electrochemical tests that can be used for corrosion tests in the automobile industry. 

In general, low level detection is masked by the noise level inherent in any measuring device. Electrochemical methods are susceptible to electrical interference from external sources, variations in reference electrode parameters resulting from aging or contamination, and interference from redox contaminants in the test solution. 

Relationships such as that in Eq. (12) offer convenient means of testing the validity of mixed potential models by comparing electrochemically determined parameters (in this case, a reaction order based on measured Tafel slopes) to values measured by other means. One such example would be the corrosion of U02 (nuclear fuel) in aerated neutral solutions containing added carbonate (6). In the presence of carbonate, corrosion product deposits are avoided, since the U02+ corrosion product is solubilized by complexation with the carbonate. Measured Tafel slopes yield a predicted reaction order of n0l = 0.67 with respect to 02 for the overall corrosion reaction ... 

From an engineering perspective, the repassivation potential is a more important parameter than the potential for pit nucleation. We want to know the potential below which pits will not grow. This is analogous in theory to measuring KiC or Kiscc in mechanical and SCC testing. One way to test this is to produce a completely bare surface that is dissolving rapidly, and determine at what potential it can repassivate. An easy way to do this is what may be termed an electrochemical scratch. ... 

These tests focused on the determination of a materials resistance to localized (pitting) corrosion. To accomplish this goal, three types of electrochemical experiments were conducted (cyclic polarization, electrochemical scratch, and potenti-ostatic holds) to measure several key parameters associated with pitting corrosion. These parameters were the breakdown potential, EM, the repassivation potential, Etp, and the passive current density, tpass. 

Highly negative values of k in addition imply the possibility to retain or even enrich elements which will form but rather labile complexes given the effective electrochemical ligand parameter of the plant species and (Eq. 2.11). These include Sr, Ba or Mn and the REEs (except of Sm, Tb) if E (L) j is close to zero in the latter case, all of which are known to be hyperaccumulated in some plants, e.g. Ba and Mn in Brazil nuts (Emsley 2001) and - among our test set of plant species - Mn gets substantially enriched in blueberries (both leaves (to which data reported here (Markert 1996) pertain) and fruits), k thus is a kind of measure for amplification of differences in the sequence of transport within some plant, from sequestration in/ by root exudates to deposition in the tips of leaves. 

Water analysis is mostly conducted using physicochemical methods. A limited number of physical parameters (temperatme, electrical conductivity, redox potential) and test parameters (such as color, smell, and taste) are measured in water analysis. Chemical/ physicochemical methods can be used to analyze for a wide range of components, both inorganic and organic. Spectrochemical or electrochemical methods are mainly used for the analysis of inorganic constituents, while chromatographic methods are applied for the analysis of organic components. 

---