Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Reduction potentials, electrochemical reactions

In measurements of conductivity, no electrochemical reactions occur. Differences in conductivity are due to differences in the ionic strengths of solutions. An alternating potential is applied to the solution at a known potential. The current is measured and the conductivity in Siemens/cm calculated.16 In potentiometry, the analyte is presumed to undergo no electrochemical reaction. The potential at the electrode changes due to changes in potential across the surface of the membrane in a membrane electrode or at the electrode surface of a solid electrode. The most familiar example of a potentiometric electrode is the pH electrode. In amperometry, current does flow, due to reduction or oxidation of the substance being analyzed. [Pg.219]

The electrochemical potential for the reaction is the difference between the reduction potentials for the reduction and oxidation half-reactions thus,... [Pg.332]

Although the applied potential at the working electrode determines if a faradaic current flows, the magnitude of the current is determined by the rate of the resulting oxidation or reduction reaction at the electrode surface. Two factors contribute to the rate of the electrochemical reaction the rate at which the reactants and products are transported to and from the surface of the electrode, and the rate at which electrons pass between the electrode and the reactants and products in solution. [Pg.511]

The thermodynamics of electrochemical reactions can be understood by considering the standard electrode potential, the potential of a reaction under standard conditions of temperature and pressure where all reactants and products are at unit activity. Table 1 Hsts a variety of standard electrode potentials. The standard potential is expressed relative to the standard hydrogen reference electrode potential in units of volts. A given reaction tends to proceed in the anodic direction, ie, toward the oxidation reaction, if the potential of the reaction is positive with respect to the standard potential. Conversely, a movement of the potential in the negative direction away from the standard potential encourages a cathodic or reduction reaction. [Pg.275]

The two dashed lines in the upper left hand corner of the Evans diagram represent the electrochemical potential vs electrochemical reaction rate (expressed as current density) for the oxidation and the reduction form of the hydrogen reaction. At point A the two are equal, ie, at equiUbrium, and the potential is therefore the equiUbrium potential, for the specific conditions involved. Note that the reaction kinetics are linear on these axes. The change in potential for each decade of log current density is referred to as the Tafel slope (12). Electrochemical reactions often exhibit this behavior and a common Tafel slope for the analysis of corrosion problems is 100 millivolts per decade of log current (1). A more detailed treatment of Tafel slopes can be found elsewhere (4,13,14). [Pg.277]

An electrochemical reaction is said to be polarized or retarded when it is limited by various physical and chemical factors. In other words, the reduction in potential difference in volts due to net current flow between the two electrodes of the corrosion cell is termed polarization. Thus, the corrosion cell is in a state of nonequilibrium due to this polarization. Figure 4-415 is a schematic illustration of a Daniel cell. The potential difference (emf) between zinc and copper electrodes is about one volt. Upon allowing current to flow through the external resistance, the potential difference falls below one volt. As the current is increased, the voltage continues to drop and upon completely short circuiting (R = 0, therefore maximum flow of current) the potential difference falls toward about zero. This phenomenon can be plotted as a polarization diagram shown in Figure 4-416. [Pg.1262]

This review is concerned with the formation of cation radicals and anion radicals from sulfoxides and sulfones. First the clear-cut evidence for this formation is summarized (ESR spectroscopy, pulse radiolysis in particular) followed by a discussion of the mechanisms of reactions with chemical oxidants and reductants in which such intermediates are proposed. In this section, the reactions of a-sulfonyl and oc-sulfinyl carbanions in which the electron transfer process has been proposed are also dealt with. The last section describes photochemical reactions involving anion and cation radicals of sulfoxides and sulfones. The electrochemistry of this class of compounds is covered in the chapter written by Simonet1 and is not discussed here some electrochemical data will however be used during the discussion of mechanisms (some reduction potential values are given in Table 1). [Pg.1048]

The reduction rate of R (low reduction potential)1 is faster than any chemical reaction such as trapping by enolate ion. The difference from the electrochemical results is that, in the latter, the secondary reduction of the sulfinate anion does not occur. [Pg.1061]

Subsequent elegant work by Lambert and coworkers61 has shown that, while under UHV conditions the electropumped Na is indistinguishable from Na adsorbed by vacuum deposition, under electrochemical reaction conditions the electrochemically supplied Na can form surface compounds (e.g. Na nitrite/nitrate during NO reduction by CO, carbonate during NO reduction by C2FI4). These compounds (nitrates, carbonates) can be effectively decomposed via positive potential application. Furthermore the large dipole moment of Na ( 5D) dominates the UWr and O behaviour of the catalyst-electrode even when such surface compounds are formed. [Pg.254]

If components of the solution phase are prone to electrochemical reactions (e.g. reduction of dissolved oxygen, reduction of oxidising anions) their presence may also cause Faradaic reactions and the subsequent establishment of an electrode potential different from iipzc. [Pg.184]

In a similar way, electrochemistry may provide an atomic level control over the deposit, using electric potential (rather than temperature) to restrict deposition of elements. A surface electrochemical reaction limited in this manner is merely underpotential deposition (UPD see Sect. 4.3 for a detailed discussion). In ECALE, thin films of chemical compounds are formed, an atomic layer at a time, by using UPD, in a cycle thus, the formation of a binary compound involves the oxidative UPD of one element and the reductive UPD of another. The potential for the former should be negative of that used for the latter in order for the deposit to remain stable while the other component elements are being deposited. Practically, this sequential deposition is implemented by using a dual bath system or a flow cell, so as to alternately expose an electrode surface to different electrolytes. When conditions are well defined, the electrolytic layers are prone to grow two dimensionally rather than three dimensionally. ECALE requires the definition of precise experimental conditions, such as potentials, reactants, concentration, pH, charge-time, which are strictly dependent on the particular compound one wants to form, and the substrate as well. The problems with this technique are that the electrode is required to be rinsed after each UPD deposition, which may result in loss of potential control, deposit reproducibility problems, and waste of time and solution. Automated deposition systems have been developed as an attempt to overcome these problems. [Pg.162]

Principles and Characteristics Voltammetric methods are electrochemical methods which comprise several current-measuring techniques involving reduction or oxidation at a metal-solution interface. Voltammetry consists of applying a variable potential difference between a reference electrode (e.g. Ag/AgCl) and a working electrode at which an electrochemical reaction is induced (Ox + ne ----> Red). Actually, the exper-... [Pg.669]

Mital et al. [40] studied the electroless deposition of Ni from DMAB and hypophosphite electrolytes, employing a variety of electrochemical techniques. They concluded that an electrochemical mechanism predominated in the case of the DMAB reductant, whereas reduction by hypophosphite was chemically controlled. The conclusion was based on mixed-potential theory the electrochemical oxidation rate of hypophosphite was found, in the absence of Ni2 + ions, to be significantly less than its oxidation rate at an equivalent potential during the electroless process. These authors do not take into account the possible implication of Ni2+ (or Co2+) ions to the mechanism of electrochemical reactions of hypophosphite. [Pg.256]

A calculation of the temperature dependence of the free energy for the reactions in Eqs. (15)-(18), and hence the electrochemical potential, showed that with an increase in temperature, formic acid formation became more unfavorable.4 In the case of formaldehyde, methanol, and methane formation, the calculation indicated a positive shift in the reduction potential, but of very small magnitude ca. 30 mV for a temperature change from 300 to 500 K, and ca. 20 mV from 500 to 1200 K.4... [Pg.344]

Cyclic voltammetry is an excellent tool to explore electrochemical reactions and to extract thermodynamic as well as kinetic information. Cyclic voltammetric data of complexes in solution show waves corresponding to successive oxidation and reduction processes. In the localized orbital approximation of ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complexes, these processes are viewed as MC and LC, respectively. Electrochemical and luminescence data are useful for calculating excited state redox potentials of sensitizers, an important piece of information from the point of view of determining whether charge injection into Ti02 is favorable. [Pg.754]

NO can be oxidized or reduced on an electrode surface. Since the reduction potential of NO is close to that of oxygen which causes huge interference NO measurement, therefore, usually oxidation of NO is used for measurement of NO. NO oxidation on solid electrodes proceeds via an EC mechanism electrochemical reaction [22] followed by chemical reaction [23], First, one-electron transfer from the NO molecule to the electrode occurred and resulted in the formation of a cation ... [Pg.26]

In amperometry, the current produced by the oxidation or reduction of an electroactive analyte species at an electrode surface is monitored under controlled potential conditions. The magnitude of the current is then related to the quantity of analyte present. However, as both antibody and antigen are not intrinsically electroactive, a suitable label must be introduced to the immunocomplex to promote an electrochemical reaction at the immunosensors. In this respect, enzyme labels including the... [Pg.154]


See other pages where Reduction potentials, electrochemical reactions is mentioned: [Pg.260]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.568]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.1014]    [Pg.1017]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.543]    [Pg.570]    [Pg.585]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.1014]    [Pg.1017]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.580]    [Pg.122]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.903 , Pg.904 ]




SEARCH



Electrochemical potential

Electrochemical reaction potential

Electrochemical reactions

Electrochemical reactions reduction

Electrochemical reduction

© 2024 chempedia.info