Electrochemical potential reference electrodes

Each MO is characterized by a particular energy level (an eigenvalue of the MO calculation) measured on a convenient energy scale. The zero of energy is fixed at some arbitrary point, analogous to the zero point of potential (reference electrode) in an electrochemical experiment. 

Any surface (typically a piece of metal) on which an electrochemical reaction takes place will produce an electrochemical potential when in contact with an electrolyte (typically water containing dissolved ions). The unit of the electrochemical potential is volt (TV = 1JC1 s 1 in SI units).The metal, or strictly speaking the metal-electrolyte interface, is called an electrode and the electrochemical reaction taking place is called the electrode reaction. The electrochemical potential of a metal in a solution, or the electrode potential, cannot be determined absolutely. It is referred to as a potential relative to a fixed and known electrode potential set up by a reference electrode in the same electrolyte. In other words, an electrode potential is the potential of an electrode measured against a reference electrode. The standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) is universally adopted as the primary standard reference electrode with which all other electrodes are compared. By definition, the SHE potential is OV, i.e. the zero-point on the electrochemical potential scale. Electrode potentials may be more positive or more negative than the SHE. 

Each electrochemical couple exhibits a characteristic electrochemical potential and a characteristic Acell voltage C, defined above, depends on the couples combined in a cell and on their concentrations. In order to quantify the properties of electrochemical couples reference electrodes are used. The reference electrode which is primarily used is the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE), or normal hydrogen electrode (NHE). In this case it is an inert Pt electrode around which hydrogen is flushed (see Fig. 3.4). The reaction involved is given by... 

Electrochemical methods may be classified into two broad classes, namely potentiometric metiiods and voltannnetric methods. The fonner involves the measurement of the potential of a working electrode iimnersed in a solution containing a redox species of interest with respect to a reference electrode. These are equilibrium experiments involving no current flow and provide themiodynamic infomiation only. The potential of the working electrode responds in a Nemstian maimer to the activity of the redox species, whilst that of the reference electrode remains constant. In contrast, m voltannnetric methods the system is perturbed... 

Figure C2.8.3. A tliree-electrode electrochemical set-up used for the measurement of polarization curves. A potentiostat is used to control the potential between the working electrode and a standard reference electrode. The current is measured and adjusted between an inert counter-electrode (typically Pt) and the working electrode.

Finding the End Point Potentiometrically Another method for locating the end point of a redox titration is to use an appropriate electrode to monitor the change in electrochemical potential as titrant is added to a solution of analyte. The end point can then be found from a visual inspection of the titration curve. The simplest experimental design (Figure 9.38) consists of a Pt indicator electrode whose potential is governed by the analyte s or titrant s redox half-reaction, and a reference electrode that has a fixed potential. A further discussion of potentiometry is found in Chapter 11. 

The potential of the working electrode, which changes as the composition of the electrochemical cell changes, is monitored by including a reference electrode and a high-impedance potentiometer. 

Potentiometric measurements are made using a potentiometer to determine the difference in potential between a working or, indicator, electrode and a counter electrode (see Figure 11.2). Since no significant current flows in potentiometry, the role of the counter electrode is reduced to that of supplying a reference potential thus, the counter electrode is usually called the reference electrode. In this section we introduce the conventions used in describing potentiometric electrochemical cells and the relationship between the measured potential and concentration. 

Potentiometric electrochemical cells are constructed such that one of the half-cells provides a known reference potential, and the potential of the other half-cell indicates the analyte s concentration. By convention, the reference electrode is taken to be the anode thus, the shorthand notation for a potentiometric electrochemical cell is... 

Electrochemical Detectors Another common group of HPLC detectors are those based on electrochemical measurements such as amperometry, voltammetry, coulometry, and conductivity. Figure 12.29b, for example, shows an amperometric flow cell. Effluent from the column passes over the working electrode, which is held at a potential favorable for oxidizing or reducing the analytes. The potential is held constant relative to a downstream reference electrode, and the current flowing between the working and auxiliary electrodes is measured. Detection limits for amperometric electrochemical detection are 10 pg-1 ng of injected analyte. 

The thermodynamics of electrochemical reactions can be understood by considering the standard electrode potential, the potential of a reaction under standard conditions of temperature and pressure where all reactants and products are at unit activity. Table 1 Hsts a variety of standard electrode potentials. The standard potential is expressed relative to the standard hydrogen reference electrode potential in units of volts. A given reaction tends to proceed in the anodic direction, ie, toward the oxidation reaction, if the potential of the reaction is positive with respect to the standard potential. Conversely, a movement of the potential in the negative direction away from the standard potential encourages a cathodic or reduction reaction. 

The changes in the optical absorption spectra of conducting polymers can be monitored using optoelectrochemical techniques. The optical spectmm of a thin polymer film, mounted on a transparent electrode, such as indium tin oxide (ITO) coated glass, is recorded. The cell is fitted with a counter and reference electrode so that the potential at the polymer-coated electrode can be controlled electrochemically. The absorption spectmm is recorded as a function of electrode potential, and the evolution of the polymer s band stmcture can be observed as it changes from insulating to conducting (11). 

This handbook deals only with systems involving metallic materials and electrolytes. Both partners to the reaction are conductors. In corrosion reactions a partial electrochemical step occurs that is influenced by electrical variables. These include the electric current I flowing through the metal/electrolyte phase boundary, and the potential difference A( = 0, - arising at the interface. and represent the electric potentials of the partners to the reaction immediately at the interface. The potential difference A0 is not directly measurable. Therefore, instead the voltage U of the cell Me /metal/electrolyte/reference electrode/Me is measured as the conventional electrode potential of the metal. The connection to the voltmeter is made of the same conductor metal Me. The potential difference - 0 is negligibly small then since A0g = 0b - 0ei ... 

The potential dependence of the velocity of an electrochemical phase boundary reaction is represented by a current-potential curve I(U). It is convenient to relate such curves to the geometric electrode surface area S, i.e., to present them as current-density-potential curves J(U). The determination of such curves is represented schematically in Fig. 2-3. A current is conducted to the counterelectrode Ej in the electrolyte by means of an external circuit (voltage source Uq, ammeter, resistances R and R") and via the electrode E, to be measured, back to the external circuit. In the diagram, the current indicated (0) is positive. The potential of E, is measured with a high-resistance voltmeter as the voltage difference of electrodes El and E2. To accomplish this, the reference electrode, E2, must be equipped with a Haber-Luggin capillary whose probe end must be brought as close as possible to... 

Ideally, one would prefer to compare anodic and cathodic potential limits instead of the overall ionic liquid electrochemical window, because difference sets of anodic and cathodic limits can give rise to the same value of electrochemical window (see Figure 3.6-1). However, the lack of a standard reference electrode system within and between ionic liquid systems precludes this possibility. Gonsequently, significant care must be taken when evaluating the impact of changes in the cation or anion on the overall ionic liquid electrochemical window. 

Reference electrodes The generally accepted criterion for the effectiveness of a cathodic-protection system is the structure/electrolyte potential (Section 10.1). In order to determine this potential it is necessary to make a contact on the structure itself and a contact with the electrolyte (soil or water). The problem of connection to the structure normally presents no difficulties, but contact with the electrolyte must be made with a reference electrode. (If for example an ordinary steel prol e were used as a reference electrode, then inaccuracies would result for two main reasons first, electrochemical action between the probe and the soil, and second, polarisatibn of the probe owing to current flow through the measuring circuit.)... 

Reference Electrode an equilibrium (reversible) electrochemical half-cell of reproducible potential against which an unknown electrode potential can be measured. Examples of those commonly used in corrosion are the Pt, H /H (the hydrogen electrode), Hg/Hg Clj/Cl" (the calomel electrode), Cu/CuS04/Cu, Ag/AgCl/Cl", all with fixed activities of the dissolved ions. 

For an electrochemical cell consisting of a metal at the potential of zero charge in a solution of surface-inactive electrolyte and a reference electrode (let us assume that any liquid junction potential can be neglected), the electrode potential is given by (cf. Eq. (20)]... 

Figure 5.18. Schematic representation of the density of states N(E) in the conduction band and of the definitions of work function d>, chemical potential of electrons p, electrochemical potential of electrons or Fermi level p, surface potential x> Galvani (or inner) potential

Figure 5.20. Left Schematic of an O2 conducting solid electrolyte cell with fixed P02 and PO2 values at the porous working (W) and reference (R ) electrodes without (top) and with (bottom) ion backspillover on the gas exposed electrodes surfaces, showing also the range of spatial constancy of the electrochemical potential, PQ2-, of O2. Right Corresponding spatial variation in the electrochemical potential of electrons, ]Ie(= Ef) UWR is fixed in both cases to the value (RT/4F)ln( P02 /pc>2 ) also shown in the relative position of the valence band, Ev, and of the bottom of the conduction band, Ec, in the solid electrolyte (SE) numerical values correspond to 8 mol% Y203-stabilized-Zr02, pc>2=10 6 bar, po2=l bar and T=673 K.32 Reproduced by permission of The Electrochemical Society.

Checking the absence of internal mass transfer limitations is a more difficult task. A procedure that can be applied in the case of catalyst electrode films is the measurement of the open circuit potential of the catalyst relative to a reference electrode under fixed gas phase atmosphere (e.g. oxygen in helium) and for different thickness of the catalyst film. Changing of the catalyst potential above a certain thickness of the catalyst film implies the onset of the appearance of internal mass transfer limitations. Such checking procedures applied in previous electrochemical promotion studies allow one to safely assume that porous catalyst films (porosity above 20-30%) with thickness not exceeding 10pm are not expected to exhibit internal mass transfer limitations. The absence of internal mass transfer limitations can also be checked by application of the Weisz-Prater criterion (see, for example ref. 33), provided that one has reliable values for the diffusion coefficient within the catalyst film. 

---