Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Effect of Water Removal

The conversion of hexanoic acid as a function of time for the three different experiments is plotted in Fig. 8.27. For orientation, the maximally obtainable conversion if no water is removed from the mixture is also plotted (79 % under the chosen conditions). The lowest curve shows a blank experiment where the liquid flows over uncoated monoliths and reacts homogeneously. The second curve represents an experiment in the autoclave where the water removal is suppressed. The comparison of these two curves indicates that, without decreasing the water contents, the catalytic activity of the BEA cannot be used efficiently. The third (highest) curve proves the effect of reactive stripping. The reaction runs much faster and easily continues beyond the equilibrium. [Pg.253]

8 Reactive Stripping in Structured Catalytic Reactors Hydrodynamics and Reaction Performance [Pg.254]


The lyophilization-induced spectral alterations in the conformationally sensitive amide 1 region are due to protein unfolding and not simply to the loss of water from the protein. The intrinsic effects of water removal on the vibrational properties of the peptide bond, and hence protein infrared spectra, were found to be insignificant by Prestrelski et al. [8]. If the direct vibrational effects of water removal were responsible for drying-induced spectral changes, then the infrared spectra of all proteins should be altered to the same degree in the dried solid, which is not the case. [Pg.131]

An illustrative example for the use of the Deloxan ASP solid acid catalyst is the esterification of free tallow fatty acid (acid number 205) with high boiling alcohols like 2-ethylhexanol. In the initial stages of the esterification reaction, the rate of reaction is determined by the effectiveness of water removal, an increase of catalyst concentration has only a minor effect on the rate under the selected test conditions within the first hour. For the sake of selectivity, i.e. decreasing side product formation by dehydration of the used alcohol, the catalyst concentration was kept low. [Pg.68]

Cho, E. et al. 2004. Effects of water removal on the performance degradation of PEMFCs repetitively brought to <0°C. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 151 A661. [Pg.67]

Lithium Chloride. Of the metal haUdes, calcium bromide [7789-41-5] CaBr2, ziac chloride [7646-85-7] ZnCl2, CaCl2, and lithium chloride [7447-41-8] LiCl, (Class 1, nonregenerative) are the most effective for water removal (4). AH are available ia the form of dehquescent crystals. The hydrates of LiCl are LiCl-nH2 O, where n = 1, 2, or 3. Lithium chloride solutions are more stable ia air and less corrosive than the other metal haUdes. The high solubihty of lithium carbonate [554-13-2] Li2C02, usually eliminates scale formation problems (see LiTHlUM COMPOUNDS). [Pg.507]

Freeze Crystallization. Freezing may be used to form pure ice crystals, which are then removed from the slurry by screens sized to pass the fine sohds but to catch the crystals and leave behind a more concentrated slurry. The process has been considered mostly for solutions, not suspensions. However, freeze crystallization has been tested for concentrating orange juice where sohds are present (see Fruit juices). Commercial apphcations include fmit juices, coffee, beer, wine (qv), and vinegar (qv). A test on milk was begun in 1989 (123). Freeze crystallization has concentrated pulp and paper black hquor from 6% to 30% dissolved sohds and showed energy savings of over 75% compared with multiple-effect evaporation. Only 35—46 kJ/kg (15—20 Btu/lb) of water removed was consumed in the process (124). [Pg.25]

Zavitsas et al. account for the effects of water in their calculations. Water promotes depolymerization of the paraformaldehyde as well as the hemiformals. Their modifications correct for the apparent reduction in methylolation rate as the extent of reaction proceeds, in that the hemiformals remove formaldehyde reactivity from the reaction mixture. Their rate constants look large because they are written for phenate concentrations rather than phenol and because of the formaldehyde equilibrium adjustments. They note that unsalted phenol is a by-... [Pg.901]

In order to obtain good yields, it is important to use dry solvent and reagents. The commercially available t-butyl hydroperoxide contains about 30% water for stabilization. For the use in a Sharpless epoxidation reaction the water has to be removed first. The effect of water present in the reaction mixture has for example been investigated by Sharpless et al. for the epoxidation of (E)-a-phenylcinnamyl alcohol, the addition of one equivalent of water led to a decrease in enantioselectivity from 99% e.e. to 48% e.e. [Pg.256]

As an illustration, the effects of varying the particle size distribution, and of temperature, on the course of water removal from dehydrated carrots in a vacuum oven are shown, respectively, in Table I and Figure 3. [Pg.41]

Cutler, Frances Casar, Douglas. Effectiveness of iron Removal by Deep-Bed Polishers. Ultrapure Water, Tall Oaks Publishing, Inc., USA, September 1998. [Pg.764]

The mechanism of NPYR formation has been studied by Coleman (37) and Bharucha et al. ( ). Coleman (37) reported that the requirement for a high temperature, the inhibitory effects of water and antioxidants, and the catalytic effect of a lipid hydroperoxide are consistent with the involvement of a free radical in the formation of NPYR. Similarly, Bharucha et al. (29) suggested that, since both NPYR and NDMA increase substantially towards the end of the frying process, N-nitros-amine formation during frying of bacon occurs essentially, if not entirely, in the fat phase after the bulk of the water is removed and therefore by a radical rather than an ionic mechanism. These authors speculated that, during the frying of... [Pg.167]

Most of the pollutants may be effectively removed by precipitation of metal hydroxides or carbonates using a reaction with lime, sodium hydroxide, or sodium carbonate. For some, improved removals are provided by the use of sodium sulfide or ferrous sulfide to precipitate the pollutants as sulfide compounds with very low solubilities. After soluble metals are precipitated as insoluble floes, one of the water-solid separators (such as dissolved air flotation, sedimentation, centrifugation, membrane filtration, and so on) can be used for floes removal.911 The effectiveness of pollutant removal by several different precipitation methods is summarized in Tables 5.15-5.17. [Pg.220]

Agricultural interests have amended existing soil properties to improve productivity their experience demonstrates the power of knowledge of soil properties and the ability to control them.14 A primary benefit of these amendment efforts was improvement in soil-water-holding capacity and increased rate of water removal from all soil layers by plants. The benefits of soil modification remain effective for decades. There is opportunity for similar improvements in soil during ET landfill cover design and construction. Control of ET cover soil properties has potential to enhance cover performance and should add little to construction cost. [Pg.1072]

The presence of a solvent, especially water, and/or other additives or impurities, often in nonstoichiometric proportions, may modify the physical properties of a solid, often through impurity defects, through changes in crystal habit (shape) or by lowering the glass transition temperature of an amorphous solid. The effects of water on the solid-state stability of proteins and peptides and the removal of water by lyophilization to produce materials of certain crystallinity are of great practical importance although still imperfectly understood. [Pg.617]

Excessive water in samples should be removed if possible, but there are processing methodologies to remove the effects of water contamination on the chemometric models used for predictions. Water appears in a specific area of the spectrum and can be digitally removed from the spectrum during the processing stages. [Pg.317]


See other pages where Effect of Water Removal is mentioned: [Pg.253]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.571]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.505]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.1310]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.625]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.1335]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.85]   


SEARCH



Effect of water

Removal of Water

Water removal

© 2024 chempedia.info