Screen sizes

Created by Rainer Glaser (University of Missouri) the animations are basic mechanisms that can be presented at full screen size m your classroom The animations on the CD can be played directly from the CD or can be im ported easily into your own lecture presentation... 

Filtered-Particle Inspection. Solids containing extensive inteiconnected porosity, eg, sintered metallic or fired ceramic bodies formed of particles that ate typically of 0.15-mm (100-mesh) screen size, are not inspectable by normal Hquid penetrant methods. The preferred test medium consists of a suspension of dyed soHd particles, which may be contained in a Hquid vehicle dyed with a different color. Test indications can form wherever suspensions can enter cracks and other discontinuities open to the surface and be absorbed in porous material along interior crack walls. The soHd particles that form test indications ate removed by filtration along the line of the crack at the surface where they form color or fluorescent indications visible under near-ultraviolet light (1,3). 

The top size of the feed to a screen deck should not be greater than two to four times the aperture size of the deck. Double- (see Fig. 3) or triple-deck screen arrangements are used, requiring a separate sizing for each deck. Then the final screen size is set by the largest deck. 

Freeze Crystallization. Freezing may be used to form pure ice crystals, which are then removed from the slurry by screens sized to pass the fine sohds but to catch the crystals and leave behind a more concentrated slurry. The process has been considered mostly for solutions, not suspensions. However, freeze crystallization has been tested for concentrating orange juice where sohds are present (see Fruit juices). Commercial apphcations include fmit juices, coffee, beer, wine (qv), and vinegar (qv). A test on milk was begun in 1989 (123). Freeze crystallization has concentrated pulp and paper black hquor from 6% to 30% dissolved sohds and showed energy savings of over 75% compared with multiple-effect evaporation. Only 35—46 kJ/kg (15—20 Btu/lb) of water removed was consumed in the process (124). 

USBS-60 corresponds to 60-mesh ( -- 0.25 mm) screen size USBS-16 corresponds to 16-mesh ( -- 1.19 mm) screen size. 

Screen size L, mm X V/ Cumulative % retained 100 (1 - Vty) Measured cumulative % retained... 

Example 3 Calculating Sample Weight for Screen-Size... 

Bentonite has expected sihca content of 0.5 weight percent (F is 0.005). Silica density (A ) is 2.4 gm per cii cm, and bentonite (Ag) is 2.6. The calculation requires knowledge of mineral properties described by the factor (fghd ). Value of the factor can be estabhshed from fundamental data (Gy) or be derived from previous experience. In this example, data from testing a shipment of bentonite of 10 mesh top-size screen analysis determined value of the mineral factor to be 0.28. This value is scaled by the cube of diameter to ys-in screen size of the example shipment. The mineral factor is scaled from 0.28 to 52 by multiplying 0.28 with the ratio of cubed 9.4 mm (ys-in screen top-size of the shipment to be tested) and cubed 1.65 mm (equivalent to 10 mesh). 

Example 3 Calculating Sample Weight for Screen-Size Measurement Weight W of bulk sample for screen analysis is calculated by the Gayle model for percent retained on a specified screen with relative standard error s.e. in percent... 

Aperture Aperture, or screen-size opening, is the minimum clear space between the edges of the opening in the screening surface and is usually given in inches or millimeters. 

The response of any given feed to sink-float processing can be accurately established in the laboratory by testing with various heavy hq-uids. The hquids generally used for this purpose are listed in Table 19-12. These halogenated hydrocarbons are mutually miscible, which enables the preparation of almost any pulp density attainable in a commercial plant. Heavy-hquid test work provides the basis for specifying the optimum screen size for the preparation of the feed. 

Screening Size exclusion solids High throuput Dry underflow ... 

The files are password- and write-protected only the numbers in the colored cells can be changed. The output was optimized for a screen with 800 X 600 resolution. In order that those who use higher resolutions can adapt the graphics to full-screen size, the password is here divulged smac. ... 

The flow of mineral particles on the deck of a riffled table results in a distribution that is essentially similar to that obtained with a smooth table. However, some additional features are introduced due to the action of the riffles. In the case of a smooth table, a hydraulically classified fraction usually makes a better feed as compared with an unsized mixture. However, a classified feed does not always work best on a riffled table, and screen-sized or unsized feed is often used. The maximum particle size that can be treated in a riffled table is generally larger than that corresponding to a smooth table. 

Screen sizes are defined in two ways by a mesh size number for small sizes and by the actual size of opening in the screen for the larger sizes. There are several different standards in use for mesh size, and it is important to quote the particular standard used when specifying particle size ranges by mesh size. In the UK the appropriate British Standards should be used BS 410 and BS 1796. A comparison of the various international standard sieve mesh sizes is given in Volume 2, Chapter 1. 

Three screen sizes (2.0, 1.0, 0.5 mm) were used for milling cowpeas and produced the particle size distributions shown in Figure 8. With the 2.0 mm screen, particles were concentrated (76%) in the 30-100 mesh range. With the 1.0 mm screen, most of the particles (82%) were in the 50-200 mesh range. Eighty per cent of the particles were in the 200-400 mesh range with the 0.5 mm screen. 

In preparing akara from each milled product, too many large particles still remained in the 2 mm material to make a smooth paste. However, highly acceptable akara with uniform shape was produced from this material after the paste was ground to eliminate the large particles. With the 0.5 mm screen, the paste was very fluid and extremely difficult to dispense, behavior which closely resembled that exhibited by the commercial cowpea flour. Akara prepared from the 0.5 mm material was also extremely distorted. Of the three screen sizes compared, the 1.0 mm screen produced the most desirable particle size distribution although the paste produced from the 1.0 mm material was somewhat more fluid than desired, it appeared that adjustments could be made in hydration of the meal to achieve an appropriate batter viscosity. 

Figure 8. Effect of mill screen size on particle size distribution of cowpea meal/flour. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 9. Copyright 1983, American Association of Cereal Chemists.

Determine the screen size, screen openings, mass fraction, and cumulative mass fraction through each screen for all runs. 

Objective 2. Determine the output particle size distribution for grinder screen sizes of 3/4, V2, and V4 inch. 

A new model of the cotton-dust analyzer was constructed to overcome some of the shortcomings of the prototype. It was more compact and easier to operate than the original machine. The sizing-screen arrangement in the new model was more accessible than in the original machine to facilitate the evaluation of various screen sizes. It was also equipped with an air regulator to maintain a constant air pressure on the spray bar for Improved airflow characteristics. Also, a high-efficiency particulate air... 

Figure 2. Cotton dust analyzer showing top holding screen, sizing screen, and...

---