Durability life prediction models

Objective of monitoring. A monitoring system, eventually with computerised data acquisition, should meet specifically defined objectives, such as a) to monitor the durability of the structure and its condition in order to make timely decisions for preventive and/or repair actions, b) to monitor the effect of preventative or repair actions, c) to monitor the condition of stmctures based on new materials and/or new technology (including service-life prediction models), d) to follow the time development in areas where access is difficult. 

What is presented above is a very simplistic approach. Joint geometries, for example, may have a significant effect on the rate of degradation, again depending on the environment. As a result, geometric modeling and finite element analyses have been employed with durability studies to assist in life predictions. 

We may conclude, therefore, that the interaction between emotion and interest cannot be modeled in terms of competing costs and benefits. Concerning the short-lived emotions, the model correctly predicts that there will be a trade-off between emotional rewards and other rewards, but it fails to incorporate the fact that the trade-off itself may be shaped by emotion. Concerning the durable emotions, the model ignores that the pursuit of emotional satisfaction may be so fundamental to a person s life that all other considerations become secondary. In brief summary, the short-lived passions undermine the theory of the rational actor, whereas the durable ones undermine the theory of homo economicus. 

Requirements specified in this way are deemed-to-satisfy rules. Such rules cannot be used to quantify the performance of the structure in general, specific effects of additional measures (for instance increasing the cover to the steel), or the consequences of sub-standard practice (for example using a higher w/c). In this respect it is important to note that EN 206 also allows the use of alternative performance-related design methods with respect to durability that consider in a quantitative way each relevant deterioration mechanism, the service life of the element or structure, and the criteria that define the end of the service life. Such methods should draw a picture of the characteristics that the concrete must possess to protect the reinforcement for the service life requested from a predictive model of the corrosion attack. These refined methods (as opposed to standard methods) may be based on long-term experience with local practices in local environments, on data from an established performance test method for the relevant mechanism, or on the use of proven predictive models. 

Bauer, D.R. Combining failure models, environmental load distributions, and customer perception of failure to generate real world durability requirements. In Martin, J.W., Ryntz, R.A., Dickie, R.A. (eds.) Service Life Prediction Challenging the Status Quo, p. 39. Federation of Societies for Coatings Technology, Bluebell, PA (2005)... 

While FRP composites are the primary focus in this durability discussion, it should be noted that degradation models for other materials within a component can be included in the framework for service life prediction (i.e., loss of area due to steel corrosion) in order to asses combined effects. The selection of material degradation models or inclusion of empirical data should reflect the environment where the rehabilitation is to take effeet. For instance, where combinations of high temperature and high humidity are antieipated, prediction models developed from moistore and elevated temperatures would be considered most appropriate for the constitoent materials selected in the rehabilitation. 

Thus, in many applications, which may involve some of the most critical uses of adhesives technology, the bonded joints are exposed to an environment which also happens to be one of the most potentially damaging. Indeed, the aspect of the durability of adhesive joints to aqueous environments is undoubtedly one of the most important challenges that the adhesives community faces. In particular, there are two main challenges to develop (a) adhesive systems (i.e. combinations of an adhesive/primer/surface pretreatment/substrate type, all of which may interact to affect the joint durability) which possess excellent long-term durability, and which are environmentally friendly and cost effective and (b) test methods and models to accurately rank and predict the service-life from short-term experiments, and thereby convince the potential user that an adequate durability will be realised. Clearly, these two aims are strongly inter-linked. 

Firstly, to continue to develop test methods and durability models which permit the service-life of an adhesive system to be accurately ranked, and quantitatively predicted, from relatively short-term tests. The use of various fracture-mechanics techniques have been detailed in the present chapter and they appear to be gaining increasing recognition as the preferred methodology, especially with the development of cohesive zone models (also known as interface elements ), which offer an excellent route for coupling fracture-mechanics parameters with FEA modelling studies. 

From the point of view of the durability of aromatic polyesters investigations were performed to predict the life time of products in different environments. From a kinetic model, based on accelerated degradation experiments, some authors tried to characterise the long term behaviour of PET under ambient conditions [34, 35]. As one result the life... 

---