Soot formation droplet

The vapor cloud of evaporated droplets bums like a diffusion flame in the turbulent state rather than as individual droplets. In the core of the spray, where droplets are evaporating, a rich mixture exists and soot formation occurs. Surrounding this core is a rich mixture zone where CO production is high and a flame front exists. Air entrainment completes the combustion, oxidizing CO to CO2 and burning the soot. Soot bumup releases radiant energy and controls flame emissivity. The relatively slow rate of soot burning compared with the rate of oxidation of CO and unbumed hydrocarbons leads to smoke formation. This model of a diffusion-controlled primary flame zone makes it possible to relate fuel chemistry to the behavior of fuels in combustors (7). 

Soot Formation from Synthetic Fuel Droplets... 

Emissions of soot on the other hand represent a smaller fraction of the overall emission, but are probably of greater concern from the standpoint of visibility and health effects. It has been suggested that soot emissions from fuel oil flames result from processes occurring in the vicinity of individual droplets (droplet soot) before macroscale mixing of vaporized material, and from reactions in the bulk gas stream (bulk soot) remote from individual droplets. Droplet soot appears to dominate under local fuel lean conditions (1, 2), while bulk soot formation occurs in fuel rich zones. Factors which are known to affect soot formation from liquid fuel flames include local stoichiometry, droplet size, gas-droplet relative velocity and fuel properties (primarily C H ratio). 

In an attempt to modify the observed droplet behavior, a brief qualitative investigation was carried out with blends of SRC-II heavy distillate and pure heptane. The objective was to enhance droplet disruptive combustion as a means of reducing effective droplet size and hence soot formation. With these fuels visible droplet fragmentation was found to occur throughout the droplet stream. The fragmentation produced new droplets on different trajectories these in turn were terminated by small disruptions, as described above. Three blends were used 60/40, 80/20, and 90/10. Secondary atomization was observed for all three, although the violence of the activity was noticeably reduced as the heptane content of the blend became smaller. This secondary atomization was a completely different process than the... 

Both diffusional flame calculations and detailed spatial mapping indicate that the nondispersed injection mode produces a vapor cloud that is characterized by diffusionally controlled combustion and bulk heating while subjecting the droplets to near isothermal conditions. The soot produced in this cloud is strongly influenced by bulk diffusion limitations and as such represents a bulk soot formation extreme. It was found that fuel changes had little effect on the overall soot yield due to this diffusion control. Lower gas temperatures and richer conditions were found to favor soot formation under bulk sooting conditions, probably due to a decrease in the oxidation rate of the soot. 

This chapter complements Refs. 21 and 22 in reviewing the progresses made on the transient, convective, multicomponent droplet vaporization, with particular emphasis on the internal transport processes and their influences on the bulk vaporization characteristics. The interest and importance in stressing these particular features of droplet vaporization arise from the fact that most of the practical fuels used are blends of many chemical compounds with widely different chemical and physical properties. The approximation of such a complex mixture by a single compound, as is frequently assumed, not only may result in grossly inaccurate estimates of the quantitative vaporization characteristics but also may not account for such potentially important phenomena as soot formation when the droplet becomes more concentrated with high-boiling point compounds towards the end of its lifetime. Furthermore, multi-... 

The crucial limits for the oil-fired and dual-fuel burners are similar to ones for the gas-fired burners (flashback and blow-off) with an additional regime for fhe soot formation that exceeded the limits established by the environmental regulations as well as a reduced atomization regime that is characterized by the occurring liquid droplets at the burner exit. 

Steam-assist flares use high pressure steam to entrain surrounding air and inject it into the core of the flare gas stream. The rapid mixing of the steam and air with the flare gas helps reduce soot formation that tends to lower the flame radiant fraction. Figure 30.14 shows a steam-assisted flare operating under identical flare gas flow conditions with and without steam-assist. Notice without steam-assist, the flame is more luminous and contains more soot this results in higher radiant fractions. The fraction of heat radiated from a flame can also be greatly increased by the presence of liquid droplets in the gas. Droplets within a hot flame can easily be converted to soot [21]. 

Both models apply the same chemical scheme of mercury transformations. It is assumed that mercury occurs in the atmosphere in two gaseous forms—gaseous elemental HgO, gaseous oxidized Hg(II) particulate oxidized Hgpart, and four aqueous forms—elemental dissolved HgO dis, mercury ion Hg2+, sulphite complex Hg(S03)2, and aggregate chloride complexes HgnClm. Physical and chemical transformations include dissolution of HgO in cloud droplets, gas-phase and aqueous-phase oxidation by ozone and chlorine, aqueous-phase formation of chloride complexes, reactions of Hg2+ reduction through the decomposition of sulphite complex, and adsorption by soot particles in droplet water. 

Thus far, four mechanisms for the formation of concentric shell carbon particles as zero-dimensional carbon allotropes have been proposed. The first mechanism is the formation of a corannulene carbon framework followed by a spiral-shell growth [48], The second mechanism is that the regular concentric arrangements of carbon layers in the onion-like caibon sphere occur tlirough the solidification process of a carbon droplet under ultrafast condensation (49J. The third mechanism is due to a solid—>quasi-liquid—>solid process tliat is, reorganization of soot-containing tubular and polyhedral graphitic particles by... 

Aerosols (suspended particles) can be natural in origin or related to human activity such as combustion (of fossil fuels) or biomass burning. They can be, for example, sea salt, mineral dust, soot, dilute sulfuric acid droplets, and their existence will depend on the proximity of sources and suitable conditions (e.g., windspeed, humidity) for their formation and transport. Aerosols, which can both scatter and absorb, are most concentrated in the lower troposphere (planetary boundary layer) and decrease quickly with altitude. High altitude aerosols are usually insignificant in terms of UV transmission, except in unusual circumstances, such as immediately after a large volcanic eruption such as Mount Pinatubo in 1991. 

One of the proposed theories applied successfully to the formation of gas-phase carbon from benzene is the droplet condensation mechanism. This "condensation theory", revised recently by Lahaye et al. (2), explains the formation of soot aerosols during benzene pyrolysis. The authors obtained an excellent agreement between the theory and experimental results. 

The formation of pyrolysis products will ultimately depend upon factors such as the following (i) the time that the askarel mixture is at a temperature which allows a reaction yield of significance (ii) the volume and surface area of droplets of askarel emitted in an eventful failure (iii) the availability of oxygen and (iv) the effect of soot particles on the dissipation of heat and the availability of oxygen. 

---