Droplet Size Measurement Equipment

Three different types of equipment are commonly used for droplet size measurement. Each has its advantages and disadvantages. First, establish the information desired before selecting the equipment type ... 

Additional reagents and equipment for measuring droplet size distribution (unit D3.3) and droplet concentration (see Support Protocol)... 

A fourth way is to count droplets individually. First, one has to dilute the emulsion strongly. Then, this diluted emulsion is pushed through a small hole. At the same time, the electrical conductivity through the hole is measured. Every time an emulsion droplet moves through the hole, the droplet will obscure part of the hole, which suddenly reduces the conductivity through the hole— the larger the droplet is, the stronger is the effect. Also in this way a droplet size distribution can be obtained. This method is usually referred to as the Coulter counter method, after an important manufacturer of this type of equipment. 

On the other hand, the fact that ultrasonic velocity is independent of droplet size In the low and high frequency limits allows droplet concentrations to be determined without prior knowledge of the droplet size distribution from ultrasonic velocity measurements. Whether measurements are to be made In the low- or high-frequency regime depends on the size of the droplets and the range of frequencies which can be measured using available ultrasonic equipment (typically 0.1-100 MHz). 

Equipment is available that can employ laboratory analytical teclmiques in instruments suited for online monitoring and detection of oily contaminants. These instruments use the principles of solvent extraction, infrared, spot testing, TOC measurement and photometric measurement of visible and ultraviolet adsorbence. They are not subject to interferences from suspended solids, air bubbles, color, oil droplet size, or dissolved solids in the water. 

Site and Application Procedures. The orchard site and air application equipment were the same as described by Currier (1982). In 1980, ground applications were made with an Ag-Tech low volume air blast sprayer, calibrated to deliver 187 1/ha, and in 1981, with a Kinkelder low volume air blast sprayer calibrated to deliver 94.6 1/ha. From previous studies of MacCollom et al ( ) and Currier ( ) it was known that the air application gave a median droplet size diameter of 100 to 150 pm. Estimation of particle size, as measured on water sensitive paper, for ground equipment was 75 to 110 pm. Application rates for captan 80W in both years was 3.12(AI) Kg/ha, and for carbaryl 80S, 2.24(AI) kg/ha. 

Great care must be taken when making these measurements to ensure that all equipment is scrupulously clean and that the temperature of the fluids and equipment is monitored and constant. The interfacial tension should be calculated based on the average droplet size of a large nnmber of droplets. If repeatable measurements are not obtainable and suitable care has been taken in the performance of the experiment, it is possible that some form of contamination has occurred. 

The laser diffraction particle sizer techniques have been used to measure spherical solid particle and droplet size distributions in dilute dispersions located in chemical reactor and separation equipment. 

The oil droplet size distribution is one of the key parameters influencing water treating equipment selection. Therefore, accurate measurement of the oil droplet size distrihution is an important task. Another important parameter is quantifying the size distribution upstream and downstream of production equipment, such as control valves. 

Several commercially available devices can be employed at the outlet of the separation system. The use of an optical drop counter is advantageous if aqueous solvents are used as eluents. With respect to usually very low concentrations of separated substances in the eluate, the surface tension and the size of the droplets are usually not affected. A siphon equipped with a photo-optical sensor may also be used to measure the retention volume. If water is used as the eluent, there are problems with the drops adhering to the inner siphon surface. 

The average size and size distribution of miniemulsion droplets and polymer capsules were determined by dynamic light scattering using a Zeta Nanosizer (Malvern Instruments, UK), equipped with a detector to measure the intensity of the scattered light at 173 to the incident beam. 

While spray quantity is important to achieving NOx reduction performance, it is independent of the type of injector technology chosen. Instead, spray quality is a primary metric used in determining the injector and mixing technology that is used. Spray quality is a measure of the size, speed, and pattern of the DEF droplets that enter the exhaust stream. Two types of test equipment used to quantify spray quality are shown in Fig. 15.8. The piece of equipment shown on the left of the... 

---