Donor transition-metal complexes

Chiswell, B. Chemistry of multidentate ligands containing heavy Group VA donors. Transition Metal Complexes of Phosphorus, Arsenic and Antimony Ligands. McAuliffe, C. A., Ed., Macmillan London, Chapter 4, 1973, 269-307. 

Although trialkyl- and triarylbismuthines are much weaker donors than the corresponding phosphoms, arsenic, and antimony compounds, they have nevertheless been employed to a considerable extent as ligands in transition metal complexes. The metals coordinated to the bismuth in these complexes include chromium (72—77), cobalt (78,79), iridium (80), iron (77,81,82), manganese (83,84), molybdenum (72,75—77,85—89), nickel (75,79,90,91), niobium (92), rhodium (93,94), silver (95—97), tungsten (72,75—77,87,89), uranium (98), and vanadium (99). The coordination compounds formed from tertiary bismuthines are less stable than those formed from tertiary phosphines, arsines, or stibines. 

The alkaline and rare-earth metals, and positive actinide ions, generally have greater affinity for —0 groups as electron donors. Many transition metals complex preferentially with enoHc —0 and some nitrogen functions. PolarizabiUty of the donor atoms correlates with stabiUty of complexes of the heavier transition metals and the more noble metal ions. 

For many species the effective atomic number (FAN) or 18- electron rule is helpful. Low spin transition-metal complexes having the FAN of the next noble gas (Table 5), which have 18 valence electrons, are usually inert, and normally react by dissociation. Fach normal donor is considered to contribute two electrons the remainder are metal valence electrons. Sixteen-electron complexes are often inert, if these are low spin and square-planar, but can undergo associative substitution and oxidative-addition reactions. 

C. A. McAuliffe and W. Levason, Phosphine, Arsine and Stibine Complexes of the Transition Elements, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1979, 546 pp. A review with over 2700 references. See also C. A. McAuliffe (ed,), Transition-Metal Complexes of Phosphorus, Arsenic and Antimony Donor Ligands, Macmillan, London, 1972,... 

The nitrogen atom in ri -pyrrolylmanganesetricarbonyl forms a donor-acceptor bond with transition metals. Complexes in which the pyrrolyl ring behaves as a tt ligand for the manganese atom and n-donor for the other metal were synthesized 12 (M = Mn, Re) [78JOM(157)431]. The binuclear heterobimetallic complexes... 

As well as phosphorus ligands, heterocyclic carbenes ligands 10 have proven to be interesting donor ligands for stabilization of transition metal complexes (especially palladium) in ionic liquids. The imidazolium cation is usually presumed to be a simple inert component of the solvent system. However, the proton on the carbon atom at position 2 in the imidazolium is acidic and this carbon atom can be depro-tonated by, for example, basic ligands of the metal complex, to form carbenes (Scheme 5.3-2). 

The lobes of electron density outside the C-O vector thus offer cr-donor lone-pair character. Surprisingly, carbon monoxide does not form particularly stable complexes with BF3 or with main group metals such as potassium or magnesium. Yet transition-metal complexes with carbon monoxide are known by the thousand. In all cases, the CO ligands are bound to the metal through the carbon atom and the complexes are called carbonyls. Furthermore, the metals occur most usually in low formal oxidation states. Dewar, Chatt and Duncanson have described a bonding scheme for the metal - CO interaction that successfully accounts for the formation and properties of these transition-metal carbonyls. 

Some iminoboranes dimerize during reaction with a transition-metal complex to diazadiboretidines. These four-membered rings then act as four-electron donors in different complexes ... 

Dihydro-lH-l,5,2-azasilaboroles derive from the 2,5-dihydro-lH-l,2-aza-boroles ( 6.5.3.3) by substitution of the carbon neighboring N by a silicon atom. They may act as four-electron donors using electron density from the C=C double bond and the N atom. The B atom behaves as an acceptor center. Two pathways are known for complex synthesis reaction with a generated transition-metal complex fragment and reaction with metal atoms by the metal-vapor synthesis method. 

Transition Metal Complexes with Sulfiir-Donor Ligands... 

Few quantitative data are available on the relative nucleophilicities of L toward various alkyl carbonyls. The rates of the reaction of CpMo(CO)3Me with L in toluene (Table II) decrease as a function of the latter reactant P( -Bu)3 > P( -OBu)j > PPhj > P(OPh)j, but the spread is relatively small (<8). The above order is that customarily observed for 8 2 reactions of low-valent transition metal complexes (J, 214). Interestingly, neither CpMo(CO)3Me nor CpFe(CO)2Me reacts with 1 or N, S, and As donor ligands 28, 79). This is in direct contrast to the insertion reactions of MeMn(CO)5 which manifest much less selectivity toward various L (see Section VI,B,C,D for details). 

Metal complexes of ligands containing a sulfur donor in conjunction with nitrogen, oxygen or a second sulfur have been reviewed in the past [11-13]. For example, reviews of the coordination compounds of dithiophosphates [14], dithiocarbamates [15, 16], dithiolates [17], dithiodiketonates [18], and xanthates [16] have appeared. The analytical aspects [19] and the spectral and structural information of transition metal complexes of thiosemicarbazones [20, 21] have been reviewed previously. Recent developments in the structural nature of metal complexes of 2-heterocyclic thiosemicarbazones and S-alkyldithiocarbazates, depicted below, are correlated to their biological activities. 

This book clearly demonstrates that transition-metal complexes of chiral sulfur ligands are nowadays powerful catalysts in a considerable number of reactions, although, they have been generally less investigated than complexes with other donor atoms, since the interest in this chemistry is much more recent. In this book, the author has attempted to systematise the role that chiral... 

The metal complexes discussed thus far bear little resemblance to the vast majority of common transition-metal complexes. Transition-metal chemistry is dominated by octahedral, square-planar, and tetrahedral coordination geometries, mixed ligand sets, and adherence to the 18-electron rule. The following three sections introduce donor-acceptor interactions that, although not unique to bonding in the d block, make the chemistry of the transition metals so distinctive. 

Why are transition metals so well suited for catalysis A complete treatment of this critical question lies well beyond the scope of this book, but we can focus on selected aspects of bond activation and reactivity for dihydrogen and alkene bonds as important special cases. Before discussing specific examples that involve formal metal acidity or hypovalency, it is convenient to sketch a more general localized donor-acceptor overview of catalytic interactions in transition-metal complexes involving dihydrogen49 (this section) and alkenes (Section 4.7.4). 

The abundance of accessible donor and acceptor orbitals in common transition-metal complexes facilitates low-energy bond rearrangements such as insertion ( oxidative-addition ) reactions, thus enabling the critically important catalytic potential of metals. 

It has long been assumed that the rates of inner-sphere electron-transfer reactions for transition-metal complexes should be sensitive to the nature of the donor and acceptor orbital symmetries. Efforts to... 

To replace the aforementioned acyl-main group and acyl-transition metal complexes, the natural course of events was to search for a stable and easy-to-handle acyl-metal complex that reacts as an unmasked acyl anion donor. Thus, the salient features of acylzirconocene chlorides as unmasked acyl anion donors remained to be explored. In the following, mostly carbon—carbon bond-forming reactions with carbon electrophiles using acylzirconocene chlorides as acyl group donors are described. 

---