Donor and acceptor effects

Rate constant for charge transfer between donor and acceptor Effective coupling between donor and acceptor states Matrix element of Hamiltonian between diabatic donor and acceptor states... 

By presenting the joint occurrence of the double (donor and acceptor) effects of the solvents, this model also explained why it was not possible to describe solvent effects in these systems by means of a single empirical parameter. It is obvious that the standard AG values for dissolution, for example, could not give a linear correlation with parameters predominantly reflecting a single type of effect, e.g., the Kosower Z value, the Reichardt Ej value, the DN value, the AN value, the relative permittivity of the solvent alone. Even in systems where one of the effects is so predominant that the system can be described more or less with a single parameter, only calculations in which the other parameters are also taken into... 

Transforming donor to acceptor via rotation An interesting possibility exists for the situations when both donor and acceptor orbitals are present at the same atom but are projected to different directions. For such atoms, rotation around bonds connecting such an atom with the rest of the molecule can turn the donor and acceptor effects on and off. In some cases, this rotation can invert the overall electronic nature of the substituent, converting an effective donor into an apparent acceptor and vice versa. 

Investigation of the electron distribution in 3-aryl(hetaryl)substituted 2-methoxy-and 2-methylthiopropenals ArCH=C(XMeX3H=0 (X = O, S) using DFT calculations at B3LYP/6-311+G and M06/6-311+G levels, together with natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis, resulted in the prediction of possible electrophilic (Markovnikov-type) or nucleophilic (Michael-type) addition reactions as a function of the donor and acceptor effects of the substituents. ... 

The K factors in (C3.4.1) represent another very important facet of tire energy transfer [4, H]. These factors depend on tire orientations of tire donor and acceptor. For certain orientations tliey can reduce tire rate of energy transfer to zero—for otliers tliey effect an enhancement of tire energy transfer to its maximum possible rate. Figure C3.4.1 exhibits tire angles which define tire mutual orientation of a donor and acceptor pair in tenns of Arose angles the orientation factors and are given by [6, 7]... 

In light of tire tlieory presented above one can understand tliat tire rate of energy delivery to an acceptor site will be modified tlirough tire influence of nuclear motions on tire mutual orientations and distances between donors and acceptors. One aspect is tire fact tliat ultrafast excitation of tire donor pool can lead to collective motion in tire excited donor wavepacket on tire potential surface of tire excited electronic state. Anotlier type of collective nuclear motion, which can also contribute to such observations, relates to tire low-frequency vibrations of tire matrix stmcture in which tire chromophores are embedded, as for example a protein backbone. In tire latter case tire matrix vibration effectively causes a collective motion of tire chromophores togetlier, witliout direct involvement on tire wavepacket motions of individual cliromophores. For all such reasons, nuclear motions cannot in general be neglected. In tliis connection it is notable tliat observations in protein complexes of low-frequency modes in tlie... 

Stereochemistry (Chapter 7) Chemistry in three dimensions the relationship of physical and chemical properties to the spatial arrangement of the atoms in a molecule Stereoelectron ic effect (Section 5 16) An electronic effect that depends on the spatial arrangement between the or bitals of the electron donor and acceptor Stereoisomers (Section 3 11) Isomers with the same constitu tion but that differ in respect to the arrangement of their atoms in space Stereoisomers may be either enantiomers or diastereomers... 

Donor and acceptor levels are the active centers in most phosphors, as in zinc sulfide [1314-98-3] ZnS, containing an activator such as Cu and various co-activators. Phosphors are coated onto the inside of fluorescent lamps to convert the intense ultraviolet and blue from the mercury emissions into lower energy light to provide a color balance closer to daylight as in Figure 11. Phosphors can also be stimulated directly by electricity as in the Destriau effect in electroluminescent panels and by an electron beam as in the cathodoluminescence used in television and cathode ray display tubes and in (usually blue) vacuum-fluorescence alphanumeric displays. 

Stereoelectronic effect (Section 5.16) An electronic effect that depends on the spatial arrangement between the orbitals of the electron donor and acceptor. 

We employed malononitrile and l-crotonoyl-3,5-dimethylpyrazole as donor and acceptor molecules, respectively. We have found that this reaction at room temperature in chloroform can be effectively catalyzed by the J ,J -DBFOX/Ph-nick-el(II) and -zinc(II) complexes in the absence of Lewis bases leading to l-(4,4-dicya-no-3-methylbutanoyl)-3,5-dimethylpyrazole in a good chemical yield and enantio-selectivity (Scheme 7.47). However, copper(II), iron(II), and titanium complexes were not effective at all, either the catalytic activity or the enantioselectivity being not sufficient. With the J ,J -DBFOX/Ph-nickel(II) aqua complex in hand as the most reactive catalyst, we then investigated the double activation method by using this catalyst. 

The spillover effect can be described as the mobility of sorbed species from one phase on which they easily adsorb (donor) to another phase where they do not directly adsorb (acceptor). In this way a seemingly inert material can acquire catalytic activity. In some cases, the acceptor can remain active even after separation from the donor. Also, quite often, as shown by Delmon and coworkers,65 67 simple mechanical mixing of the donor and acceptor phases is sufficient for spillover to occur and influence catalytic kinetics leading to a Remote Control mechanism, a term first introduced by Delmon.65 Spillover may lead, not only to an improvement of catalytic activity and selectivity but also to an increase in lifetime and regenerability of catalysts. 

With one more N-B bond, the cyclic conjugation is discontinuous in 1,3,2,4-diaza-diborine. The donors and acceptors are alternately disposed along the cyclic chain. Electrons cannot effectively delocalize in a cyclic manner, but between the adjacent donor-acceptor pairs in a non-cyclic manner. The diazadiborine is not predicted to be aromatic. 

Those sets for which the resonance effect is predominant are the sets which are most likely to give rise to the free carbonium ion 5, as the substituents in these sets (sets 15-14 and 15-17 and possibly 15-18) are all donors by resonance, as is shown by their Or values. Those sets for which the localized effect is predominant may be accounted for in terms of intermediates 3 or 4. Sets 15-5, 15-7B2, and 15-12 gave significant values of jS. It is difficult to account for this fact in terms of intermediate 4. The results can be accounted for in terms of intermediate 3, however, if this species resembles other three-membered rings, such as cyclopropane, in its behavior. Sets 15-6, 15-8, 15-9, 15-12, and 15-15 include both donor and acceptor substituents. The successful correlation of... 

Molecules with donor and acceptor in trans- and a s-configurations give much higher nonlinearities, due to favorable linear donor-acceptor conjugation, than those with substituents at the geminal position, where only the weaker cross-conjugation is effective (see 89 vs 86 and 92, Fig. 8). 

The segment chemical potential ps(o)is also called the o-potential of a solvent It is a specific function expressing the affinity of a solvent S for solute surface of polarity a. Typical o-profiles and o-potentials are shown in Fig. 11.4. From the a-potentials it can clearly be seen that hexane Ukes nonpolar surfaces and increasingly dislikes polar surfaces, that water does notUke nonpolar surfaces (hydrophobic effect), but that it likes both H-bond donor and acceptor surfaces, that methanol likes donor surfaces more than does water, but acceptors less, and many other features. 

For ionizable sample molecules, it is possible to create an effective sink condition in PAMPA by selecting buffers of different pH in the donor and acceptor compartments. For example, consider salicylic acid (v>Ka 2.88 see Table 3.1). According to the pH partition hypothesis, only the free acid is expected to permeate lipophilic membranes. If the donor pH < 2 and the acceptor pH is 7.4, then as soon as the free acid reaches the acceptor compartment, the molecule ionizes, and the concentration of the free acid becomes effectively zero, even though the total concentration of the species in the acceptor compartment may be relatively high. This situation may be called an ionization-maintained sink. 

When membrane retention of the solute needs to be considered, one can derive the appropriate permeability equations along the lines described in the preceding section Eqs. (7.1)—(7.3) apply (with P designated as the effective permeability, Pe). However, the mass balance would need to include the membrane compartment, in addition to the donor and acceptor compartments. At time t, the sample distributes (mol amounts) between three compartments ... 

When the pH is different on the two sides of the membrane, the transport of ioniz-able molecules can be dramatically altered. In effect, sink conditions can be created by pH gradients. Assay improvements can be achieved using such gradients between the donor and acceptor compartments of the permeation cell. A three-compartment diffusion differential equation can be derived that takes into account gradient pH conditions and membrane retention of the drug molecule (which clearly still exists—albeit lessened—in spite of the sink condition created). As before, one begins with two flux equations... 

An infrequently used method (in pharmaceutical research) for determining the UWL permeability involves measuring transport of molecules across a high-porosity microfilter that is not coated by a lipid. The molecules are able to diffuse freely in the water channels of the microfilter. The filter barrier prevents convective mixing between the donor and acceptor sides, and an UWL forms on each sides of the microfilter. Camenisch et al. [546] measured the effective permeabilities of a series of drug molecules in 96-well microtiter plate-filterplate (Millipore GVHP mixed cellulose ester, 0.22 pm pore) sandwich where the filters were not coated by a lipid. The permeabilities were nearly the same for all the molecules, as shown in Fig. 7.8a. Our analysis of their data, Fig. 7.8b, indicates / aq = 460 pm (sandwich stirred at 150 rpm). We have been able to confirm similar results in our laboratory with different microfilters, using the lipid-free method. 

With the site-selective hole injection and the hole trapping device established, the efficiency of the hole transport between the hole donor and acceptor, especially with respect to the distance and sequence dependence, were examined. Our experiments showed that hole transport between two guanines was extremely inefficient when the intervening sequence consisted of more than 5 A-T base pairs [1]. Hole injection into the DNA n-stack using photoexcited dCNBPU was accompanied by the formation of dCNBPU anion radical. Therefore, hole transport would always compete with the back electron transfer (BET). To minimize the effect of BET, we opted for hole transport between G triplets, that are still lower in oxidation potential than G doublet. With this experimental system, we researched the effect of the bridging sequence between two G triplets on the efficiency of hole transport [2]. 

The G doublet and triplet effectively functions as a thermodynamic sink in DNA-mediated hole transport. However, the rate determining step of hole trapping at guanine clusters and the rate of hole trapping are not well understood. Furthermore, hole transfer between the donor and acceptor should compete with the hole trapping reaction the relative rate of hole trapping versus the hole transfer rate determines the overall efficiency for the hole transfer. 

Below we will use Eq. (16), which, in certain models in the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, enables us to take into account both the dependence of the proton tunneling between fixed vibrational states on the coordinates of other nuclei and the contribution to the transition probability arising from the excited vibrational states of the proton. Taking into account that the proton is the easiest nucleus and that proton transfer reactions occur often between heavy donor and acceptor molecules we will not consider here the effects of the inertia, nonadiabaticity, and mixing of the normal coordinates. These effects will be considered in Section V in the discussion of the processes of the transfer of heavier atoms. 

Exploration of collective effects in multiple transfers that appear when the donor and acceptor are the same molecules and display the so-called homotransfer. In this case, the presence of only one molecular quencher can quench fluorescence of the whole ensemble of emitters coupled by homotransfer [32]. The other possibility of using homo-FRET is the detection of intermolecular interactions by the decrease of anisotropy [33]. 

---