Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Domains interacting, characterization

These interactions involve adhesion proteins called selectins, which are found both on the rolling leukocytes and on the endothelial cells of the vascular walls. Selectins have a characteristic domain structure, consisting of an N-terminal extracellular lectin domain, a single epidermal growth factor (EGR) domain, a series of two to nine short consensus repeat (SCR) domains, a single transmembrane segment, and a short cytoplasmic domain. Lectin domains, first characterized in plants, bind carbohydrates... [Pg.283]

The second kinetic domain is characterized by a longer time constant [600 s (Fig. 8)], where the Cu1+ ion concentration increases form 25% to 40%. Since the doping level of PMeT is equal to 25 %, no more S03CF3-ions are available for this process. Thus, the newly synthesized Cu1 + ions should come from a direct interaction with the polymer backbone. [Pg.191]

In summary, the presence of three acidic residues in the RT loop allows for the formation of a lysine-specific interaction that is unique to c-Crk and its close relatives, explaining the selectivity of this domain. Arginine can form two or three hydrogen bonds with only one or two acidic residues in the RT loop. This is not true for lysine, which needs three carboxylate groups to fuUy satisfy its hydrogen-bonding potential. As shown in Table II, aU interactions typical of the c-Crk-N-SH3 domain are characterized by the presence of lysine downstream from the conserved proline-rich core. Thus, it appears that this domain selects class II ligands. [Pg.242]

Fig. 1 Three representative cases of wPPIs. Case I a weak protein-protein interaction found in a locally highly crowded manner. Case II a weak domain-domain interaction, exemplified by A-B pair, as part of a tight multi-domain complex. Such weak binary domain-domain interaction may be undetectable by many conventional methods including deletion mapping, yeast-hybrid approach, immunoprecipitation, etc., but become apparent when the tertiary structure of the tight complex is challengingly determined. However, NMR may be able to pick this interaction at early stage of the characterization. Case III a weak protein-protein interaction as a part of multi-protein complex. Similar to II), a weak A-D pair may not be detectable in isolated manner by any conventional techniques except NMR... Fig. 1 Three representative cases of wPPIs. Case I a weak protein-protein interaction found in a locally highly crowded manner. Case II a weak domain-domain interaction, exemplified by A-B pair, as part of a tight multi-domain complex. Such weak binary domain-domain interaction may be undetectable by many conventional methods including deletion mapping, yeast-hybrid approach, immunoprecipitation, etc., but become apparent when the tertiary structure of the tight complex is challengingly determined. However, NMR may be able to pick this interaction at early stage of the characterization. Case III a weak protein-protein interaction as a part of multi-protein complex. Similar to II), a weak A-D pair may not be detectable in isolated manner by any conventional techniques except NMR...
Velyvis A, Yang Y, Wu C et al (2001) Solution structure of the focal adhesion adaptor PINCH LIMl domain and characterization of its interaction with the integrin-linked kinase ankyrin repeat domain. J Biol Chem 276 4932-4939... [Pg.115]

For conventional probes, acoustic verification aims at characterizing the beam pattern, beam crossing, beam angle, sensitivity, etc., which are key characteristics in the acoustic interaction between acoustic beam and defect. For array transducers, obviously, it is also a meaning to check the acoustic capabilities of the probe. That is to valid a domain (angle beam, focus, etc.) in which the probe can operate satisfactorily. [Pg.822]

One may also observe a transition to a type of defect-mediated turbulence in this Turing system (see figure C3.6.12 (b). Here the defects divide the system into domains of spots and stripes. The defects move erratically and lead to a turbulent state characterized by exponential decay of correlations [59]. Turing bifurcations can interact with the Hopf bifurcations discussed above to give rise to very complicated spatio-temporal patterns [63, 64]. [Pg.3069]

The model describing interaction between two bodies, one of which is a deformed solid and the other is a rigid one, we call a contact problem. After the deformation, the rigid body (called also punch or obstacle) remains invariable, and the solid must not penetrate into the punch. Meanwhile, it is assumed that the contact area (i.e. the set where the boundary of the deformed solid coincides with the obstacle surface) is unknown a priori. This condition is physically acceptable and is called a nonpenetration condition. We intend to give a mathematical description of nonpenetration conditions to diversified models of solids for contact and crack problems. Indeed, as one will see, the nonpenetration of crack surfaces is similar to contact problems. In this subsection, the contact problems for two-dimensional problems characterizing constraints imposed inside a domain are considered. [Pg.13]

Therefore, monolayers may consist of two different chemisorption modes ordered in different domains, simultaneously coexisting homogeneous clusters, each characterized by a different conformer in their unit cell. This may explain the observation of 2D Hquid in butane- and hexanethiolate monolayers on gold (278), where VDW interactions do not provide enough cohesive energy to allow for small domains to coexist as a 2D soHd. [Pg.542]

The Src SH2 domain typifies a large number of those characterized to date. The pTyr fits into a pocket on the opposite side of the central sheet to the pY-r3 pocket (Figure 13.27a). All known SH2 domains bind pTyr in essentially the same way, but some have a different pattern of contacts for the residues that follow. For example, in the Grb2 SH2 domain, a tryptophan side chain from the small sheet fills the pY-r3 pocket, and the bound peptide takes a different course, with important interactions to an asparagine at pY-r2. Screens of peptide libraries have detected the importance of this asparagine. The SH2 domain from PFC-yl contacts five mainly hydrophobic residues that follow pTyr. [Pg.274]

Several nonconventional cadherins that contain cadherin repeats have been described but they have specific features not found in the classical cadherins [1]. The cadherin Flamingo, originally detected in Drosophila, contains seven transmembrane segments and in this respect resembles G protein-coupled receptors. The extracellular domain of Flamingo and its mammalian homologs is composed of cadherin repeats as well as EGF-like and laminin motifs. The seven transmembrane span cadherins have a role in homotypic cell interactions and in the establishment of cell polarity. The FAT-related cadherins are characterized by a large number of cadherin repeats (34 in FAT and 27 in dachsous). Their cytoplasmic domains can bind to catenins. T- (=truncated-)cadherin differs from other cadherins in that it has no transmembrane domain but is attached to the cell membrane via a glycosylpho-sphatidylinositol anchor. [Pg.307]


See other pages where Domains interacting, characterization is mentioned: [Pg.1005]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.1611]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.698]    [Pg.677]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.541]    [Pg.897]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.2531]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.2598]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.723]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.553]    [Pg.561]    [Pg.846]    [Pg.1023]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.114 ]




SEARCH



Interaction domains

© 2024 chempedia.info