Distributor collaboration

The framework in Figure 9.18 illustrates a relationship between a Trader who makes Orders from a Distributor. In the framework, we don t care how the Trader gets rid of stock, nor how the Distributor acquires it. We have shown this as a degenerate collaboration, as it will next be refined as a unit. (Notice that we ve made all the types substitutable except Date. So we would likely have Date defined as an actual type somewhere in the package in which this framework definition appears or in the packages it imports.)... 

EcoRI linkers—Collaborative Research, Inc. (U.K. distributors Uniscience Ltd., 8, Jesus Lane, Cambridge CBS 8BA). 

Stimulate open liaison and collaboration with universities, government agencies, advisors, extension workers, distributors and farmers. 

During a sabbatical in 1999, he developed a new and original continuous-discrete simulation software. This was done in collaboration with a commercial software distributor. The developed modules are now part of the basic version of a software that is distributed worldwide. 

The other collaboration task is Performance Assessment which calculates important metrics in order to discover trends, develop other strategies, and assess the attainment of business goals. The retailer task here is Supplier Scorecard, and the manufacturer task is Customer Scorecard. The model described above is a two-tiered model. However, this model can be extended to include more than two layers in the supply chain. VICS calls this N-tier Collaboration, which is a relationship that develops from retailers through manufacturers/distributors to suppliers. 

Creation of anetwork with distributors/sup-pliers with an interlinked and improved collaborative network infrastructure... 

Through the use of collaboration tools, the questions ofhowto create awin-win situation between suppliers, distributors, the supply chain members, and to what extent collaboration tools are used become a concern for supply chains. Littler, Lev-erick, Bmce (1995) questioned the suitability of supplier collaboration maybe his question needs to be further extended, and it should be worded as to what extent/level supply chain collaboration is considered to be beneficial ... 

The first generation of the CPFR process had nine tasks in its generic business model that trace the collaboration process between manufacturers, retailers, and distributors. The nine steps, listed in Table 3.5, provide a flavor for the overall CPFR approach. The first two steps are planning-, the next six are forecasting-, the last step is replenishment. 

Vendor- Managed Inventory (VMI) Vendor- Managed Replenishment (VMR) The practice of partnering between distribution channel members that changes the traditional replenishment process from distributor-generated purchase orders, based on economic order cjuantities, to the replenishment of products based on actual and forecasted product demand. Source CRP Best) A process by which a supplier automatically replenishes customer stock based on actual sales or shipments. Also called continuous replenishment. (Adapted from APICS Dictionary, 10th edition) Some practitioners view VMR as an enhancement of VMI, requiring more collaboration. 

The EQOS Collaborator solution allows companies in the total value chain to automate and share-business information on a real-time basis amongst customers, suppliers, distributors and retailers. 

The number of firms in this level is very small and rates only 1 or 2% of the total sample. Here we find the firms that have worked collaboratively with suppliers, distributors, and customers to build new business models focused on end consumption. These models are enhanced front to back with e-commerce features and the best cyber-based technologies. Another one to two points can flow to the bottom line in this level. 

Customer relationship management (CRM) systems will finally flourish and link the nucleus firm with its most important business customers, while collaborative planning, forecasting, and replenishment (CPFR) techniques will be at work with any retailers or business customers benefiting from this type of shared effort. Distributors and resellers will play a familiar... 

Share only the data that truly provide value. The value of data depeuds on where one sits in the supply chain. A retailer finds point-of-sale data to be quite valuable in measuring the performance of its stores. However, a manufacturer selling to a distributor that, in turn, sells to retailers does not need all the point-of-sale detail. The manufacturer finds aggregate demand data to be quite valuable, with marginally more value coming from detailed point-of-sale data. Keeping the data shared to what is truly required decreases investment in IT and improves the chances of successful collaboration. 

DC replenishment collaboration Retail DC or distributor DC Drugstores, hardware, grocery... 

DC replenishment collaboration is relatively easy to implement because it requires collaboration on aggregate data and does not require sharing of detailed POS data. As a result, it is often the best scenario with which to start collaboration. Over time, this form of collaboration can be extended to include all storage points in the supply chain, from retail shelves to raw material warehouses. According to Hammond (1994), Barilla implemented this form of collaboration with its distributors. 

The Principal organization sought to manage the risks in the downstream supply chain through a process of close collaboration, effective communications and the building of trust within the relationships. The development of Performance Standards was not seen by the distributors as the imposition of a risk management strategy to protect the principal but rather a collaborative approach that resolved the risks within the chain to the mutual benefit of all partners. 

---