Diffusive interfacial transport

In the diffusive interfacial transport-refractive index (DIT-NDX) method, compositions are determined using precise refractive index data (8). Refractive index data valid to +/- 0.00005 are obtainable using the DIT apparatus vithin an area of 30 ym2 in a sample approximately 25-ym thick (0.75 picoliter volume). Data collection and analysis require 9 seconds. The accuracy, spatial resolution, and speed vith vhich refractive indices can be determined are thus superb. 

If all six of these assumptions are satisfied, then (12.45) is valid and the calculations are simplified considerably. Our goal now will be to first quantify the rates of the five necessary process steps (gas-phase diffusion, interfacial transport, ionization, aqueous-phase diffusion, reaction) calculating appropriate timescales. Then, we will compare these rates to those of aqueous-phase chemical reactions. Finally, we will integrate our conclusions, developing overall reaction rate expressions that take into consideration, when necessary, the effects of the mass transport limitations. 

To analyze laboratory uptake data it is necessary to determine how y depends on the other parameters of the system. Let us assume that potentially any or all of gas-phase diffusion, interfacial transport, and aqueous-phase diffusion may be influential. We assume steady-state conditions and that species A is consumed by a first-order aqueous phase reaction (12.101). At steady state the rate of transfer of species A across the gas-liquid interface, given by (12.1 IS), must be equal to that as a result of simultaneous aqueous-phase diffusion and reaction, (12.112) ... 

A quantitative phase studies method based on the swelling principle has also been developed it is termed the diffusive interfacial transport (DIT) method (7). In the DIT method, phases are formed by swelling the surfactant within a long, thin, silica capillary having a chamber with a rectangular cross-section and optically flat walls. The swelling produces phase bands separated by interfaces composition profiles within these bands extrapolated to the position of the interface provide quantitative information as to the compositions of coexisting phases. 

Interfacial transfer of chemicals provides an interesting twist to our chemical fate and transport investigations. Even though the flow is generally turbulent in both phases, there is no turbulence across the interface in the diffusive sublayer, and the problem becomes one of the rate of diffusion. In addition, temporal mean turbulence quantities, such as eddy diffusion coefficient, are less helpful to us now. The unsteady character of turbulence near the diffusive sublayer is crucial to understanding and characterizing interfacial transport processes. 

It may seem as though we have abandoned our statement that the unsteady aspects of the interaction of the diffusive sublayer and turbulence are paramount, because Kb, Kl, and Kg are all bulk quantities. However, the unsteady relationships that exist will still be brought into the analysis of equation (8.10) and (8.11) (i.e., 5 = 8 D, turbulance)). This relatively simple characterization provides for most of the research regarding interfacial transport rates. 

However, if iF iL, then the observations of the current density, i, and its behavior will be vety much dependent on iL, i.e., on transport and diffusion. By observing such a current, one would gather much information about the concentration of entities in the solution. However, the physicochemical content of i0 (Chapter 9) would be obscured. Clearly, there will be cases in which iF - iL and both diffusion and transport as well as the properties of the interfacial reaction will influence i. 

Reaction of dissolved gases in clouds occurs by the sequence gas-phase diffusion, interfacial mass transport, and concurrent aqueous-phase diffusion and reaction. Information required for evaluation of rates of such reactions includes fundamental data such as equilibrium constants, gas solubilities, kinetic rate laws, including dependence on pH and catalysts or inhibitors, diffusion coefficients, and mass-accommodation coefficients, and situational data such as pH and concentrations of reagents and other species influencing reaction rates, liquid-water content, drop size distribution, insolation, temperature, etc. Rate evaluations indicate that aqueous-phase oxidation of S(IV) by H2O2 and O3 can be important for representative conditions. No important aqueous-phase reactions of nitrogen species have been identified. Examination of microscale mass-transport rates indicates that mass transport only rarely limits the rate of in-cloud reaction for representative conditions. Field measurements and studies of reaction kinetics in authentic precipitation samples are consistent with rate evaluations. 

At these assumptions and simplifications the thermodynamic network analysis (TNA) [90] can be applied to analyze LM transport. Certainly in the case of a real specific system, the detailed mechanism of reaction-diffusion interfacial phenomena should be taken into account as far as possible. The above assumptions allow maintaining a concept of a homogeneous reaction. Any universal model does not exist, and in the description of a real membrane process the accessible knowledge concerning the specific interfacial processes should be taken into account. The model presented can be regarded as a simplified example only. 

In reaction engineering the ordinary diffusion processes taking place close to an interface have been analyzed in two ways. First, as just mentioned, the interfacial transport fluxes can be described in a fundamental manner adopting the Fourier s and Fick s laws which are expressed in terms of the transport coefficients known as conductivity and diffusivity. Second, the interfacial... 

The first physically sound model for adsorption kinetics, which was derived by Ward and Tordai [18], is based on the assumption that the time dependence of a surface or interfacial tension (which is directly proportional to the surface excess F, in mol m ) is caused by diffusion and transport of surfactant molecules to the interface. This is referred to as diffusion-controlled adsorption kinetics model . The interfacial surfactant concentration at any time t, T(t), is given by the following expression,... 

Here a is the drop radius, k a specific solubilization rate determined experimentally, c, the concentration of surfactant in micelles, and 0g and 9 the ratios of concentrations of the soluble species in the bulk and at the interface to the equilibrium solubilization capacity at c,. This equation for interfacially controlled transport is the counterpart to the well-known von Smoluchowski equation for diffusion-controlled transport ... 

The analysis was extended to predict mean drop size evolution for mixed emulsions consisting initially of some drops of pure decane and some of pure squalane. Its predictions based on interfacially controlled transport were in better agreement with the experimental results of Binks et al. than were those of the authors model, which was based on diffusion-controlled transport. 

Reactions taking place on the surface of solid or liquid particles and inside liquid droplets play an important role in the middle atmosphere, especially in the lower stratosphere where sulfate aerosol particles and polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) are observed. The nature, properties and chemical composition of these particles are described in Chapters 5 and 6. Several parameters are commonly used to describe the uptake of gas-phase molecules into these particles (1) the sticking coefficient s which is the fraction of collisions of a gaseous molecule with a solid or liquid particle that results in the uptake of this molecule on the surface of the particle (2) the accommodation coefficient a which is the fraction of collisions that leads to incorporation into the bulk condensed phase, and (3) the reaction probability 7 (also called the reactive uptake coefficient) which is the fraction of collisions that results in reactive loss of the molecule (chemical reaction). Thus, the accommodation coefficient a represents the probability of reversible physical uptake of a gaseous species colliding with a surface, while the reaction probability 7 accounts for reactive (irreversible) uptake of trace gas species on condensed surfaces. This latter coefficient represents the transfer of a gas into the condensed phase and takes into account processes such as liquid phase solubility, interfacial transport or aqueous phase diffusion, chemical reaction on the surface or inside the condensed phase, etc. 

In technological applications as well as in scientific experiments specific boundary conditions are often given, such as definite changes of the interfacial area. A schematic representation is given in Fig. 4.2. which shows various bulk and interfacial transport processes of surface active molecules diffusion in the bulk, interfacial diffusion, bulk flow of different origin, interfacial compression and dilation. 

FIGURE 12.8 Maximum molar uptake rate per ppb of gas-phase reagent as a function of cloud drop diameter, as controlled by gas-phase diffusion, or interfacial transport for various accommodation coefficient values at T = 298 K and for Dg = 0.1 cm2 s l and MA = 30 g mol""1 (Schwartz 1986). 

FIGURE 12.13 Mass transfer constant km accounting for gas-phase diffusion and interfacial transport as a function of the droplet diameter and the accommodation coefficient (Schwartz 1986). 

---