Diffusive interfacial transport cell

A. Turhan, J. J. Kowal, K. Heller, J. Brenizer, and M. M. Mench. Diffusion media and interfacial effects on fluid storage and transport in fuel cell porous media and flow channels. ECS Transactions 3 (2007) 435-444. 

Continuity of fhe wafer flux fhrough the membrane and across the external membrane interfaces determines gradients in water activity or concentration these depend on rates of water transport through the membrane by diffusion, hydraulic permeation, and electro-osmofic drag, as well as on the rates of interfacial kinetic processes (i.e., vaporization and condensafion). This applies to membrane operation in a working fuel cell as well as to ex situ membrane measuremenfs wifh controlled water fluxes fhat are conducted in order to study transport properties of membranes. 

Dungan et al. [186] have measured the interfacial mass transfer coefficients for the transfer of proteins (a-chymotrypsin and cytochrome C) between a bulk aqueous phase and a reverse micellar phase using a stirred diffusion cell and showed that charge interactions play a dominant role in the interfacial forward transport kinetics. The flux of protein across the bulk interface separating an aqueous buffered solution and a reverse micellar phase was measured for the purpose. Kinetic parameters for the transfer of proteins to or from a reverse micellar solution were determined at a given salt concentration, pH, and stirring... 

In voltammetric experiments, electroactive species in solution are transported to the surface of the electrodes where they undergo charge transfer processes. In the most simple of cases, electron-transfer processes behave reversibly, and diffusion in solution acts as a rate-determining step. However, in most cases, the voltammetric pattern becomes more complicated. The main reasons for causing deviations from reversible behavior include (i) a slow kinetics of interfacial electron transfer, (ii) the presence of parallel chemical reactions in the solution phase, (iii) and the occurrence of surface effects such as gas evolution and/or adsorption/desorption and/or formation/dissolution of solid deposits. Further, voltammetric curves can be distorted by uncompensated ohmic drops and capacitive effects in the cell [81-83]. 

In PEMFC systems, water is transported in both transversal and lateral direction in the cells. A polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) separates the anode and the cathode compartments, however water is inherently transported between these two electrodes by absorption, desorption and diffusion of water in the membrane.5,6 In operational fuel cells, water is also transported by an electro-osmotic effect and thus transversal water content distribution in the membrane is determined as a result of coupled water transport processes including diffusion, electro-osmosis, pressure-driven convection and interfacial mass transfer. To establish water management method in PEMFCs, it is strongly needed to obtain fundamental understandings on water transport in the cells. 

The above argument, along with the evidences presented in Sections 5.3.2.1-5.3.2.2, indicates that other transport mechanisms than diffusion-controlled lithium transport may dominate during the CT experiments. Furthermore, the Ohmic relationship between Jiiu and A indicates that internal cell resistance plays a critical role in lithium intercalation/deintercalation. If this is the case, it is reasonable to suggest that the interfacial flux of lithium ion is determined by the difference between the applied potential E pp and the actual instantaneous electrode potential (t), divided by the internal cell resistance Keen- Consequently, lithium ions barely undergo any real potentiostatic constraint at the electrode/electrolyte interface. This condition is designated as cell-impedance-controlled lithium transport. 

The cell in Figure 2 is a typical apparatus used in LL studies. However, recently small interfaces, called here microinterfaces, were shown to have some experimental advantage. The purpose of this modification was to use the same advantage that the ultramicroelectrodes have. Ultramicroelectrodes help to overcome solution resistance difficulties that originate from a potential shift due to an uncompensated iR drop. As the interfacial area becomes smaller, the diffusion geometry becomes a spherically symmetric process, which means that the ratio of charge transport current versus solution resistance increases and, ultimately, renders the iR drop minimal. In ITIES studies, restriction of the interfacial area and use of a current amplifier for voltammetric studies is a viable alternative to a four-electrode potentiostat. 

Sulfonated Pis with a high proton conductivity and low methanol permeability were tested for their performance as proton exchange membranes in direct methanol fuel cells [58]. The proton to methanol transport selectivity of the membranes correlates well with the self-diffusion coefficients of water in the membranes. The membranes show an improved fuel cell device performance, however the high interfacial resistance between the membranes and electrodes... 

---