Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Diffusion equations simulation

Fig. 7. Chemical front propagation in the period-1 domain ( 2 = 1.4). (Top panel) Deterministic reaction-diffusion equation simulation of a circulating trigger wave. The diffusion coefficient in reduced units is AtD/ Ax) = 1 /8. The times reported in the figure are in units of 10 At with At = 1.783 x 10 . The concentration of species X is plotted as a function of space and time. (Middle panel) Automaton simulation for the same parameter values as in the top panel. (Bottom panel) Automaton simulation with D = /2. Fig. 7. Chemical front propagation in the period-1 domain ( 2 = 1.4). (Top panel) Deterministic reaction-diffusion equation simulation of a circulating trigger wave. The diffusion coefficient in reduced units is AtD/ Ax) = 1 /8. The times reported in the figure are in units of 10 At with At = 1.783 x 10 . The concentration of species X is plotted as a function of space and time. (Middle panel) Automaton simulation for the same parameter values as in the top panel. (Bottom panel) Automaton simulation with D = /2.
J. Kostrowicki and H.A. Scheraga, Application of the diffusion equation method for global optimization to oligopeptides, J. Phys. Chem. 96 (1992), 7442-7449. M. Levitt, A simplified representation of protein confomations for rapid simulation of protein folding, J. Mol. Biol. 104 (1976), 59-107. [Pg.223]

The rate of chemical diffusion in a nonfiowing medium can be predicted. This is usually done with an equation, derived from the diffusion equation, that incorporates an empirical correction parameter. These correction factors are often based on molar volume. Molecular dynamics simulations can also be used. [Pg.115]

Therefore if the carbon substrate is present at sufficiently high concentration anywhere in the rhizosphere (i.e., p p, ax), the microbial biomass will increase exponentially. Most models have considered the microbes to be immobile and so Eq. (33) can be solved independently for each position in the rhizosphere provided the substrate concentration is known. This, in turn, is simulated by treating substrate-carbon as the diffusing solute in Eq. (32). The substrate consumption by microorganisms is considered as a sink term in the diffusion equation, Eq. (8). [Pg.349]

In addition to the fact that MPC dynamics is both simple and efficient to simulate, one of its main advantages is that the transport properties that characterize the behavior of the macroscopic laws may be computed. Furthermore, the macroscopic evolution equations can be derived from the full phase space Markov chain formulation. Such derivations have been carried out to obtain the full set of hydrodynamic equations for a one-component fluid [15, 18] and the reaction-diffusion equation for a reacting mixture [17]. In order to simplify the presentation and yet illustrate the methods that are used to carry out such derivations, we restrict our considerations to the simpler case of the derivation of the diffusion equation for a test particle in the fluid. The methods used to derive this equation and obtain the autocorrelation function expression for the diffusion coefficient are easily generalized to the full set of hydrodynamic equations. [Pg.99]

This power law decay is captured in MPC dynamics simulations of the reacting system. The rate coefficient kf t) can be computed from — dnA t)/dt)/nA t), which can be determined directly from the simulation. Figure 18 plots kf t) versus t and confirms the power law decay arising from diffusive dynamics [17]. Comparison with the theoretical estimate shows that the diffusion equation approach with the radiation boundary condition provides a good approximation to the simulation results. [Pg.130]

The first and second integrals have their coordinate systems centered on the catalytic C and noncatalytic N spheres, respectively. The local nonequilibrium average microscopic density field for species a is pa(r) = [Y = 5(r - ( )) The solution of the diffusion equation can be used to estimate this nonequilibrium density, and thus the velocity of the nanodimer can be computed. The simple model yields results in qualitative accord with the MPC dynamics simulations and shows how the nonequilibrium density field produced by reaction, in combination with the different interactions of the B particles with the noncatalytic sphere, leads to directed motion [117],... [Pg.135]

The set of the reaction-diffusion equations (78) can be solved by different methods, including bifurcation analysis [185,189-191], cellular automata simulations [192,193], or numerical integration [194—197], Recently, two-dimensional Turing structures were also successfully studied by Mecke [198,199] within the framework of integral geometry. In his works he demonstrated that using morphological measures of patterns facilitates their classification and makes possible to describe the pattern transitions quantitatively. [Pg.189]

Computer simulation and analytical methods have both been used, based on diffusion equation, partition function and scaling theory approaches. There are a number of parameters which are common to most of these theories some of these are also relevant to theories of polymer solutions, i.e. [Pg.9]

Eggels and Somers (1995) used an LB scheme for simulating species transport in a cavity flow. Such an LB scheme, however, is more memory intensive than a FV formulation of the convective-diffusion equation, as in the LB discretization typically 18 single-precision concentrations (associated with the 18 velocity directions in the usual lattice) need to be stored, while in the FV just 2 or 3 (double-precision) variables are needed. Scalar species transport therefore can better be simulated with an FV solver. [Pg.176]

While Heisig et al. solved the diffusion equation numerically using a finite volume method and thus from a macroscopic point of view, Frasch took a mesoscopic approach the diffusion of single molecules was simulated using a random walk [69], A limited number of molecules were allowed moving in a two-dimensional biphasic representation of the stratum corneum. The positions of the molecules were changed with each time step by adding a random number to each of the molecule s coordinates. The displacement was related... [Pg.477]

To evaluate the demixing process under the nonisoquench depth condition, they carried out computer simulations of the time dependent concentration fluctuation using the Cahn-Hilliard nonlinear diffusion equation. [Pg.113]

Over the last four decades or so, transport phenomena research has benefited from the substantial efforts made to replace empiricism by fundamental knowledge based on computer simulations and theoretical modeling of transport phenomena. These efforts were spurred on by the publication in 1960 by Bird et al. (6) of the first edition of their quintessential monograph on the interrelationships among the three fundamental types of transport phenomena mass transport, energy transport, and momentum transport. All transport phenomena follow the same pattern in accordance with the generalized diffusion equation (GDE). The unidimensional flux, or overall transport rate per unit area in one direction, is expressed as a system property multiplied by a gradient (5)... [Pg.91]

It shows the clear link between the change of motion of the particle and its diffusion coefficient. In Fig. 50, the velocity autocorrelation function of liquid argon at 90 K (calculated by computer simulation) is shown [451], The velocity becomes effectively randomised within a time less than lps. Further comments on the velocity autocorrelation functions obtained by computer simulation are reserved until the next sub-section. Because the velocity autocorrelation function of molecular liquids is small for times of a picosecond or more, the diffusion coefficient defined in the limit above is effectively established and constant. Consequently, the diffusion equation becomes a reasonable description of molecular motion over times comparable with or greater than the time over which the velocity autocorrelation function had decayed effectively to zero. Under... [Pg.321]

M. Hershkowitz-Kaufman, Bifurcation analysis of nonlinear reaction-diffusion equations. II. Steady state solutions and comparison with numerical simulations. Bull. Math. Biol., 37, 589-636 (1975). [Pg.244]

Numerical simulations have been conveniently used to describe complex fluid dynamic behavior in microstructures [21, 86]. Van der Linde et al. [87] solved the coupled diffusion equation for reacting species and compared the results with data from the oxidation of CO on alumina-supported Cr using the step-response method. Transient periodical concentration changes in microchannels have been numerically calculated by various authors [19, 58, 88]. [Pg.118]

Figures 23 and 24 show the liquid-phase compositions for, respectively, the reboiler and condenser as functions of time. After column startup, the concentration of methanol decreases continuously whereas the distillate mole fraction of methyl acetate reaches about 90%. A comparison of the rate-based simulation (with the Maxwell-Stefan diffusion equations) and experimental results for the liquid-phase composition at the column top and in the column reboiler demonstrates their satisfactory agreement (Figures 23 and 24). Figure 25 shows the simulation... Figures 23 and 24 show the liquid-phase compositions for, respectively, the reboiler and condenser as functions of time. After column startup, the concentration of methanol decreases continuously whereas the distillate mole fraction of methyl acetate reaches about 90%. A comparison of the rate-based simulation (with the Maxwell-Stefan diffusion equations) and experimental results for the liquid-phase composition at the column top and in the column reboiler demonstrates their satisfactory agreement (Figures 23 and 24). Figure 25 shows the simulation...
P 21] The mixing of gaseous methanol and oxygen was simulated. The equations applied for the calculation were based on the Navier-Stokes (pressure and velocity) and the species convection-diffusion equation [57]. As the diffusivity value for the binary gas mixture 2.8 x 10 m2 s 1 was taken. The flow was laminar in all cases adiabatic conditions were applied at the domain boundaries. Compressibility and slip effects were taken into account The inlet temperature was set to 400 K. The total number of cells was —17 000 in all cases. [Pg.69]

P 61] The numerical simulations were based on the solution of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equation and a convection-diffusion equation for a concentration field by means of the finite-volume method [152], The Einstein convention of summation over repeated indices was used. For pressure-velocity coupling, the SIMPLEC algorithm and for discretization of the species concentration equation the QUICK differencing scheme were applied. Hybrid and the central differencing schemes referred to velocities and pressure, respectively (commercial flow solvers CFX4 and CFX5). [Pg.194]

The role of thermal fluctuations for membranes interacting via arbitrary potentials, which constitutes a problem of general interest, is however still unsolved. Earlier treatments G-7 coupled the fluctuations and the interaction potential and revealed that the fluctuation pressure has a different functional dependence on the intermembrane separation than that predicted by Helfrich for rigid-wall interactions. The calculations were refined later by using variational methods.3 8 The first of them employed a symmetric functional form for the distribution of the membrane positions as the solution of a diffusion equation in an infinite well.3 However, recent Monte Carlo simulations of stacks of lipid bilayers interacting via realistic potentials indicated that the distribution of the intermembrane distances is asymmetric 9 the root-mean-square fluctuations obtained from experiment were also shown to be in disagreement with this theory.10... [Pg.348]

This is Fick s second diffusion equation [242], an adaptation to diffusion of the heat transfer equation of Fourier [253]. Technically, it is a second-order parabolic partial differential equation (pde). In fact, it will mostly be only the skeleton of the actual equation one needs to solve there will usually be such complications as convection (solution moving) and chemical reactions taking place in the solution, which will cause concentration changes in addition to diffusion itself. Numerical solution may then be the only way we can get numbers from such equations - hence digital simulation. [Pg.2]

In digital simulation, when discretising the diffusion equation, we have a first derivative with respect to time, and one or more second derivatives with respect to the space coordinates sometimes also spatial first derivatives. Efficient simuiation methods will always strive to maximise the orders. [Pg.35]

The Feldberg approach to digital simulation [229] uses a somewhat different method of discretisation, and the method is alive and well it is, for example, the basis for the commercial program DigiSim [482], It begins with Fick s first diffusion equation, using fluxes between boxes or finite volumes, rather than concentrations at points in the discretisation process (see below). [Pg.145]

The first approach is the discretization of the convection and the diffusion operators of the PDEs, which gives rise to a large (or very large) system of effective low-dimensional models. The order of these low-dimensional models depend on the minimum mesh size (or discretization interval) required to avoid spurious solutions. For example, the minimum number of mesh points (Nxyz) necessary to perform a direct numerical simulation (DNS) of convective-diffusion equation for non-reacting turbulent flow is given by (Baldyga and Bourne, 1999)... [Pg.214]


See other pages where Diffusion equations simulation is mentioned: [Pg.156]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.853]    [Pg.738]    [Pg.591]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.661]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.546]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.343]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.412 , Pg.414 ]




SEARCH



Diffusion equations

© 2024 chempedia.info