Central differencing

The QUICK scheme has a truncation error of order h. However, similarly as in the case of the central differencing scheme, at high flow velocities some of the coupling coefficients of Eq. (37) become negative. 

Table 19.3 Spreadsheet analysis for Example 19-2 using central differencing (columns (2), (3), (4), (6), and (7) are the same as in Table 19.2)...

The results for central differencing are given similarly in Table 19.3. Only the columns which are different from those in Table 19.2 are shown. Thus, F(t) is the same as in Table 19.2, but E(t), t, and of are different. From Table 19.3,... 

Figure 19.14 shows the values of coul(t) predicted using 19.4-46a and 19.4-46b. The central differencing technique provides a superior representation of the ex-... 

Because the central-differencing on the continuity equation is only neutrally stable, it is beneficial to introduce an artificial damping term to assist numerical stability [199]. Following common practice in solving Euler equations, a first-order damping term may be... 

P 61] The numerical simulations were based on the solution of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equation and a convection-diffusion equation for a concentration field by means of the finite-volume method [152], The Einstein convention of summation over repeated indices was used. For pressure-velocity coupling, the SIMPLEC algorithm and for discretization of the species concentration equation the QUICK differencing scheme were applied. Hybrid and the central differencing schemes referred to velocities and pressure, respectively (commercial flow solvers CFX4 and CFX5). 

Interpolation with Eq. (6.25) is second-order accurate. This approximation is called the central differencing scheme (CDS). 

It can be seen that the central differencing scheme discussed above is conservative. The coefficients of CDS satisfy the Scarborough criterion. However, for uniform grid (Ae = 0.5), when the Peclet number is higher than 2, the coefficients oe will become negative [Fg > This violates the boundedness requirements and may... 

Shyy, W., Thakur, S. and Wright, J. (1992), Second-order upwind and central differencing schemes for recirculating flow computations, AIAA J., 30, 923-932. 

On a Cartesian grid, n = x at the e face and the usual schemes can be used to estimate gradient at e. For example, a central differencing scheme will give ... 

In forward differencing we let 5V, = V, — Vi i in backward differencing we let 5Vi- = Vi — Vi. In central differencing we say that a particular difference is associated with the interval between two of the original values, and that therefore <5V 1/2 K — K i While this is less convenient for computation (how many programming languages allow for half-integer valued subscripts ), it reflects the semantics of the sequence better, and we will use it as our convention. 

Numerical Solution. In the numerical formulation of THCC, Equations (2) and (3) are substituted into Equation (1). The resulting set of Nf, partial differential equations is transcribed into Nb finite-difference equations, using central differencing in space and the Crank-Nicolson method to obtain second-order accuracy in time. The set of unknowns consists of i = 1,..., ATft, and Pjt, k = 1,..., A/p, at each finite-difference node. Residue equations for the basis species are formed by algebraically summing all terms in the finite-difference forms of the transport equations. The finite-difference analogs of Equation (1) provide Ni, residue equations at each node the remaining Np residue equations are provided by the solubility products for the reactive solids. 

Maudsley (1984) proposes central differences for the inner points, with forward and backward differences at the boundaries. The pipeline is split into K pipe reaches, each of which is assumed to have two state variables associated with it a pressure and a flow, both of which will vary with time. Central differencing... 

An advantage of this formulation is that both upstream and downstream disturbances may be transmitted in a natural way from pipe reach to pipe reach. Rearranging equations (19.10) and (19.80) and using central differencing for K pipe reaches gives ... 

For the solution of the governing equations, an iterative scheme is followed [69], After determining the intensity at a cell center (see Eq. 7.141), the intensity downstream of the surface element can be determined via extrapolation using Eq. 7.140. The central differencing used in Eq. 7.140 may result in negative intensities, particularly if the change in the radiative field is steep. A numerical solution to this problem was recommended by Truelove [67], where a mixture of central and upward differencing is used ... 

SOD scheme the central differencing formula is used to extrapolate to a new point in... 

In the numerical solution of the one-dimensional system, we used a three-point central differencing scheme such that the first and second spatial derivatives of C at point i (for a grid with non-uniform spacing) were... 

We apply the same three-point central differencing scheme as was used in the one-dimensional case to this two-dimensional space, which gives the form of the derivatives for the concentration at point i, j) as... 

Kietzmann et al. (1998) discussed discretization schemes for the solution of Eq. 8.25. The equation is a typical convection equation and an upwinding is required for numerical stability. However, the upwind discretization may result in numerical diffusion that blurs the flow front interface. A hybrid implicit scheme that combines upwind differencing and central differencing is therefore suggested. 

---