Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Diffusion controlled mixtures

In general, tests have tended to concentrate attention on the ability of a flux model to interpolate through the intermediate pressure range between Knudsen diffusion control and bulk diffusion control. What is also important, but seldom known at present, is whether a model predicts a composition dependence consistent with experiment for the matrix elements in equation (10.2). In multicomponent mixtures an enormous amount of experimental work would be needed to investigate this thoroughly, but it should be possible to supplement a systematic investigation of a flux model applied to binary systems with some limited experiments on particular multicomponent mixtures, as in the work of Hesse and Koder, and Remick and Geankoplia. Interpretation of such tests would be simplest and most direct if they were to be carried out with only small differences in composition between the two sides of the porous medium. Diffusion would then occur in a system of essentially uniform composition, so that flux measurements would provide values for the matrix elements in (10.2) at well-defined compositions. [Pg.101]

The only other situation in which equations (11.3) are firmly established for a pellet of arbitrary shape is the case of a mixture at the limit of bulk diffusion control, with diffusion describable in terms of the dusty... [Pg.145]

As a particular case of this result, it follows that the stoichiometric relations are always satisfied in a binary mixture at the limit of bulk diffusion control and Infinite permeability (at least to the extent that the dusty gas equations are valid), since then all the binary pair bulk diffusion coefficients are necessarily equal, as there is only one of them. This special case was discussed by Hite and Jackson [77], and the reasoning set out here is a straightforward generalization of their treatment. [Pg.149]

Despite the very restricted circumstances In which these equations properly describe the dynamical behavior, they are the starting point for almost all the extensive literature on the stability of steady states in catalyst pellets. It is therefore Interesting to examine the case of a binary mixture at the opposite limit, where bulk diffusion controls, to see what form the dynamical equations should take in a coarsely porous pellet. [Pg.164]

When bulk diffusion controls and the d Arcy permeability is large, corresponding to pores of large diameter, the flux relations for a binary mixture reduce to a limiting form given by equation (3.29) and its companion obtained by interchanging the suffixes 1 and 2, namely... [Pg.164]

Manufacture and Processing. Mononitrotoluenes are produced by the nitration of toluene in a manner similar to that described for nitrobenzene. The presence of the methyl group on the aromatic ring faciUtates the nitration of toluene, as compared to that of benzene, and increases the ease of oxidation which results in undesirable by-products. Thus the nitration of toluene generally is carried out at lower temperatures than the nitration of benzene to minimize oxidative side reactions. Because toluene nitrates at a faster rate than benzene, the milder conditions also reduce the formation of dinitrotoluenes. Toluene is less soluble than benzene in the acid phase, thus vigorous agitation of the reaction mixture is necessary to maximize the interfacial area of the two phases and the mass transfer of the reactants. The rate of a typical industrial nitration can be modeled in terms of a fast reaction taking place in a zone in the aqueous phase adjacent to the interface where the reaction is diffusion controlled. [Pg.70]

The vapor cloud of evaporated droplets bums like a diffusion flame in the turbulent state rather than as individual droplets. In the core of the spray, where droplets are evaporating, a rich mixture exists and soot formation occurs. Surrounding this core is a rich mixture zone where CO production is high and a flame front exists. Air entrainment completes the combustion, oxidizing CO to CO2 and burning the soot. Soot bumup releases radiant energy and controls flame emissivity. The relatively slow rate of soot burning compared with the rate of oxidation of CO and unbumed hydrocarbons leads to smoke formation. This model of a diffusion-controlled primary flame zone makes it possible to relate fuel chemistry to the behavior of fuels in combustors (7). [Pg.412]

The retarding influence of the product barrier in many solid—solid interactions is a rate-controlling factor that is not usually apparent in the decompositions of single solids. However, even where diffusion control operates, this is often in addition to, and in conjunction with, geometric factors (i.e. changes in reaction interfacial area with a) and kinetic equations based on contributions from both sources are discussed in Chap. 3, Sect. 3.3. As in the decompositions of single solids, reaction rate coefficients (and the shapes of a—time curves) for solid + solid reactions are sensitive to sizes, shapes and, here, also on the relative dispositions of the components of the reactant mixture. Inevitably as the number of different crystalline components present initially is increased, the number of variables requiring specification to define the reactant completely rises the parameters concerned are mentioned in Table 17. [Pg.249]

The only conclusion that we can draw is that diffusion-controlled solid state reactions tend to produce mixtures of compounds, the relative ratio of which is related to their thermod5rnamic stability at the reaction temperature. Obviously then, if we change the temperature of reaction, we would expect to see somewhat different mixtures of compounds produced. [Pg.168]

Alkenes are scavengers that are able to differentiate between carbenes (cycloaddition) and carbocations (electrophilic addition). The reactions of phenyl-carbene (117) with equimolar mixtures of methanol and alkenes afforded phenylcyclopropanes (120) and benzyl methyl ether (121) as the major products (Scheme 24).51 Electrophilic addition of the benzyl cation (118) to alkenes, leading to 122 and 123 by way of 119, was a minor route (ca. 6%). Isobutene and enol ethers gave similar results. The overall contribution of 118 must be more than 6% as (part of) the ether 121 also originates from 118. Alcohols and enol ethers react with diarylcarbenium ions at about the same rates (ca. 109 M-1 s-1), somewhat faster than alkenes (ca. 108 M-1 s-1).52 By extrapolation, diffusion-controlled rates and indiscriminate reactions are expected for the free (solvated) benzyl cation (118). In support of this notion, the product distributions in Scheme 24 only respond slightly to the nature of the n bond (alkene vs. enol ether). The formation of free benzyl cations from phenylcarbene and methanol is thus estimated to be in the range of 10-15%. However, the major route to the benzyl ether 121, whether by ion-pair collapse or by way of an ylide, cannot be identified. [Pg.15]

In diffusion-controlled permeation, the components in a mixture differ largely in size but none is excluded from the pore network [8]. Separation is determined by the relative diffusivity (mobility) of a component within the zeolite. Expression of this mechanism requires low to medium loadings of the pore network where molecule-molecule interactions do not hinder diffusion. At high loadings, the mobility of aU molecules is reduced and they become unable to pass one another in the pore network [8]. [Pg.318]

Since an explosive solid contains fuel and oxidant in close proximity, the exothermic reaction can occur very quickly and without diffusion control, justas for separate fuel and oxidant systems. Premixed flames and explosions with gases involve the same basic idea with both fuel and oxidant mixed before reaction begins (and potentially disastrous consequences if they are ignited with inappropriate mixtures and confinement). [Pg.432]

Facilitated transport of penicilHn-G in a SLM system using tetrabutyl ammonium hydrogen sulfate and various amines as carriers and dichloromethane, butyl acetate, etc., as the solvents has been reported [57,58]. Tertiary and secondary amines were found to be more efficient carriers in view of their easy accessibility for back extraction, the extraction being faciUtated by co-transport of a proton. The effects of flow rates, carrier concentrations, initial penicilHn-G concentration, and pH of feed and stripping phases on transport rate of penicillin-G was investigated. Under optimized pH conditions, i. e., extraction at pH 6.0-6.5 and re-extraction at pH 7.0, no decomposition of peniciUin-G occurred. The same SLM system has been applied for selective separation of penicilHn-G from a mixture containing phenyl acetic acid with a maximum separation factor of 1.8 under a liquid membrane diffusion controlled mechanism [59]. Tsikas et al. [60] studied the combined extraction of peniciUin-G and enzymatic hydrolysis of 6-aminopenicillanic acid (6-APA) in a hollow fiber carrier (Amberlite LA-2) mediated SLM system. [Pg.220]

In a novel kinetic approach, Dorfman et al. developed methods for rapidly generating very reactive carbanions such as the benzyl anion in solvent mixtures containing water and alcohols. With pulsed radiolysis techniques, they have been able to study the fast and very exothermic reactions of carbanions with these solvents. The studies have shown that despite the high exothermicity, the protonation is not diffusion controlled and depends on the nature of the carbanion s counterion. [Pg.96]

A mixture of 2-naphthoylazide and sensitizer 2-isopropylthioxanthone ( r = 65 kcal/mol) was irradiated (k > 385 nm), conditions under which the sensitizer absorbed >95% of the light. Laser flash photolysis experiments demonstrated that the triplet sensitizer is quenched by 2-naphthoylazide at a diffusion controlled rate. [Pg.514]


See other pages where Diffusion controlled mixtures is mentioned: [Pg.1]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.572]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.479]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.572]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.41]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.159 ]




SEARCH



Diffusion control

Diffusion controlled

© 2024 chempedia.info