Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Diffusion-Controlled Mechanism

Similar procedure can be used to derive the coarsening rate governed by the diffusion mechanism. The rate of change in the particle radius, which is related to the diflusive flux at the precipitate surface, is given by [4, 13]  [Pg.527]

From the solution of the coupled differential Eqs. (8.12) and (8.16), the distribution function for steady-state coarsening has the following forms [4, 13]  [Pg.527]

The distribution function is also independent of the initial size distribution, but the average radius a should be equal to a, while the maximum particle radius is equal to 3a /2. For the mechanism of diffusion control, the critical or average radius in the steady-state coarsening regime increases with time following a cubic law, which is given by  [Pg.527]

Deviations have been found in the predictions of the LSW theory. For instance, a practical system could have broader and more symmetrical steady-state distribution in difiusion-controUed coarsening. Also, the rate constant predicted by the LSW theory is often different from the experimental observations. In addition, volume fraction of the precipitates sometimes should be included, which is assumed to have no effect in the LSW theory [14-16]. It is found that as the volume fraction increases, the rate constant is increased while the size distribution function is broadened with increasing volume fraction of the precipitates [17]. Further modifications have made the LSW theory to be more agreement with experimental results [15, 18]. [Pg.528]


Figure 1.55. The relationships between the concentration product, (Ba " )i(S04 )i, at the initiation of barite precipitation, and morphologies of barite crystals (Shikazono, 1994). The dashed line represents the boundary between dendritic barite crystals and well-formed rhombohedral, rectangular, and polyhedral barite crystals. The 150°C data are from Shikazono (1994) the others from other investigations. D dendritic (spindle-like, rodlike, star-like, cross-like) barite Dp feather-like dendritic barite W well-formed rectangular, rhombohedral, and polyhedral barite. The boundary between the diffusion-controlled mechanism (Di) and the surface reaction mechanism (S) for barite precipitation at 25°C estimated by Nielsen (1958) The solubility product for barite in 1 molal NaCl solution at 150°C based on data by Helgeson (1969) and Blount (1977). A-B The solubility product for barite in 1 molal NaCl solution from 25 to 150°C based on data by Helgeson (1969). Figure 1.55. The relationships between the concentration product, (Ba " )i(S04 )i, at the initiation of barite precipitation, and morphologies of barite crystals (Shikazono, 1994). The dashed line represents the boundary between dendritic barite crystals and well-formed rhombohedral, rectangular, and polyhedral barite crystals. The 150°C data are from Shikazono (1994) the others from other investigations. D dendritic (spindle-like, rodlike, star-like, cross-like) barite Dp feather-like dendritic barite W well-formed rectangular, rhombohedral, and polyhedral barite. The boundary between the diffusion-controlled mechanism (Di) and the surface reaction mechanism (S) for barite precipitation at 25°C estimated by Nielsen (1958) The solubility product for barite in 1 molal NaCl solution at 150°C based on data by Helgeson (1969) and Blount (1977). A-B The solubility product for barite in 1 molal NaCl solution from 25 to 150°C based on data by Helgeson (1969).
In a bulk silica matrix that differs from the silica nanomatrix regarding only the matrix size but has a similar network structure of silica, several kinetic parameters have been studied and the results demonstrated a diffusion controlled mechanism for penetration of other species into the silica matrix [89-93]. When the silica is used as a catalyst matrix in the liquid phase, slow diffusion of reactants to the catalytic sites within the silica rendered the reaction diffusion controlled [90]. It was also reported that the reduction rate of encapsulated ferricytochrome by sodium dithionite decreased in a bulk silica matrix by an order of magnitude compared to its original reaction rate in a homogeneous solution [89], In gas-phase reactions in the silica matrix, diffusion limitations were observed occasionally [93],... [Pg.245]

The values of n for LiBr and Ii2S04 he between 1 and 2, implying a two-dimensional diffusion-controlled mechanism with deceleratory nucleation. However, the liNOs process has n = 0.5, indicating that this process is completely nucleation controlled. liOH has n = 2.2, consistent with a phase boundary controlled process in two dimensions, with deceleratory nucleation again. [Pg.174]

Facilitated transport of penicilHn-G in a SLM system using tetrabutyl ammonium hydrogen sulfate and various amines as carriers and dichloromethane, butyl acetate, etc., as the solvents has been reported [57,58]. Tertiary and secondary amines were found to be more efficient carriers in view of their easy accessibility for back extraction, the extraction being faciUtated by co-transport of a proton. The effects of flow rates, carrier concentrations, initial penicilHn-G concentration, and pH of feed and stripping phases on transport rate of penicillin-G was investigated. Under optimized pH conditions, i. e., extraction at pH 6.0-6.5 and re-extraction at pH 7.0, no decomposition of peniciUin-G occurred. The same SLM system has been applied for selective separation of penicilHn-G from a mixture containing phenyl acetic acid with a maximum separation factor of 1.8 under a liquid membrane diffusion controlled mechanism [59]. Tsikas et al. [60] studied the combined extraction of peniciUin-G and enzymatic hydrolysis of 6-aminopenicillanic acid (6-APA) in a hollow fiber carrier (Amberlite LA-2) mediated SLM system. [Pg.220]

The diffusion-controlled mechanism of triplet-triplet quenching (whether it be collisional or interaction at a distance) could still be applied to interpret these results, qualitatively at least, if one additional factor is taken into account. The additional factor is the extremely slow rate of diffusion in rigid medium which makes necessary the Consideration of nonsteady-state effects. Immediately after illumination is shut off, those triplet molecules situated close together will diffuse and interact more rapidly than others situated at greater distances. The more favorably situated pairs of triplets will thus be depleted more rapidly and the overall rate of interaction will be greater at shorter times than later when steady-state conditions will ultimately be approached. In fluid solvents at room temperature the steady state is reached after about 10-7 sec. In very highly viscous media, however, much longer times are required and this could explain the non-exponential decay observed with phenanthrene in EPA at 77°K. [Pg.379]

The relative importance of the pre-association and diffusion-controlled mechanisms does not appear to have been considered in detail for the reactions discussed in this chapter. In order to do so, it is necessary to combine the reaction paths of Schemes 1 and 2 as shown in Scheme 3. In this and the previous Schemes, the species A. B and X. B are considered as encounter pairs without specific interaction between the components. [Pg.10]

Thus, for a reaction for which ktJk, > 1 mol"1 dm3, it follows that the limiting rate for the pre-association mechanism will normally be less than the limiting rate by the diffusion-controlled mechanism. One simple indication of whether ken/k 1 > 1 mol"1 dm3 is whether the overall reaction becomes zeroth-order with respect to B for [B] < 1 mol dm"3. If this is so, the above inequality must hold. For nitration by nitric acid in nitromethane, acetic acid, or ca. 70% sulphuric acid, the reaction rate becomes zeroth-order with respect to the aromatic compound for [ArH] nitration reaction cannot take advantage of the pre-association pathway to exceed significantly the limiting rate imposed by the diffusion-controlled pathway since the former limit is necessarily much less than the latter. This does not apply to nitration in acetic anhydride. [Pg.44]

The objective is to reduce volatiles to below 50-100-ppm levels. In most devolatilization equipment, the solution is exposed to a vacuum, the level of which sets the thermodynamic upper limit of separation. The vacuum is generally high enough to superheat the solution and foam it. Foaming is essentially a boiling mechanism. In this case, the mechanism involves a series of steps creation of a vapor phase by nucleation, bubble growth, bubble coalescence and breakup, and bubble rupture. At a very low concentration of volatiles, foaming may not take place, and removal of volatiles would proceed via a diffusion-controlled mechanism to a liquid-vapor macroscopic interface enhanced by laminar flow-induced repeated surface renewals, which can also cause entrapment of vapor bubbles. [Pg.410]

As long as the films were not Si rich, the resistivity was in the range of 75 /u -cm. When substrate temperature was varied between 650°Cand 750°C, the deposition rates were unchanged. This implies that the reaction is proceeding by a diffusion-controlled mechanism. The resistivity of the better films after a 1-hour, 900°C anneal in argon was 60 /t 2-cm, independent of the deposition temperature. [Pg.101]

As previously stated, this discussion is valid for homogeneous explosives, such as the ones used in the military, since their reactions are predominantly intramolecular. Such explosives are often referred to as ideal explosives, in particular when they can be described using the steady state model of Chapman and Jouguet. In heterogeneous explosives (non-ideal), which are currently used in civil applications, intermolecular (diffusion controlled) mechanisms are predominant for the air bubbles, cavities or cracks (etc.). As a general rule detonation velocities increase proportional to the diameter. [Pg.103]

From the observation that the first explosion limit is lowered by inert gases such as N2 and He it is necessary to conclude that, at pressures lower than this limit, termination is predominantly at the surfaces and by a diffusion-controlled mechanism. From the further observation that this limit usually lies in the range 1 to 10 mm Hg for spherical flasks of 5 to 10 cm diameter it is further possible to show, by using our approximate analysis [Eq. (XIV.G.2)], that the efficiency of capture of the wall-terminating radicals is of order of 10 or larger (i.e., the probability of capture per collision 6 10 ). [Pg.455]

Peppas attribute the difference in disintegration rate between soluble and insoluble matrices to two proposed phenomena—an interface-controlled mechanism and a diffusion-controlled mechanism—as represented in the following equation ... [Pg.3559]

The c0—tr curve for the same compound enables us to check the validity of such interpretations by transforming the tt vs. t curve into an adsorption vs. time relationship. For the case under consideration, the r vs. yft curve is given in Figure 10. Here the induction period has completely disappeared, and the linearity of the initial part of the T vs. y/t plot is consistent with a diffusion-controlled mechanism, rather than with the presence of an adsorption barrier. From the Ward-Tordai (12) equation for the initial part of the adsorption ... [Pg.293]

By variating D, all values of F(0) fi-om Eqs (4.25) and (4.26) are fitted to the corresponding F(t) - values, i.e., to the experimental y(t) - values. For these calculations the values of the specific parameters F and a l of the studied surfactant are needed. These are to be determined beforehand from the corresponding equilibrium interfacial tension isotherm. If the fitted value of D is reasonable the studied surfactant adsorbs by a diffusion-controlled mechanism. Systematic studies of sufficiently pure surfactant systems have shown that surfactants usually adsorb by a diffusion-controlled mechanism (Kretzschmar Miller 1991, Miller Lunkenheimer 1986). Experimental results with different surfactant systems will be discussed in Section 4.3. [Pg.110]

For a multi-component solution and the same diffusion-controlled mechanism as t ->0 we obtain the total adsorption. [Pg.133]

In the first case, either the theoretical model has to allow for the evaporation process or evaporation has to be avoided by the establishment of special experimental conditions. MacLeod Radke (1994) report on the adsorption kinetics of 1-decanol at the aqueous solution interface using the growing drop method. They distinguish between three cases decanol in the aqueous phase only, decanol in the air phase only, decanol in both phases. The adsorption kinetics shows different behaviour and is fastest for the case of decanol in both phases (Fig. 5.34). The application of a proper theory (for example Miller 1980, MacLeod Radke 1994) in all three cases is a diffusion-controlled mechanism of the decanol adsorption kinetics. [Pg.183]


See other pages where Diffusion-Controlled Mechanism is mentioned: [Pg.138]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.621]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.1208]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.3560]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.900]    [Pg.432]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.271]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.75 ]




SEARCH



Diffusion control

Diffusion controlled

Diffusion-controlled adsorption mechanism

Diffusion-controlled release mechanisms

Polymer crystallization diffusion-controlled mechanism

Reaction mechanism diffusion-controlled

© 2024 chempedia.info