Diffusion-controlled deposition

For example, when diffusion-controlled deposition is done in a tube such as that shown in Figure 7, the boundary layer grows and there is an exponential decrease in deposition thickness as x increases.14 To correct for this phenomena, the susceptor is tilted up, as shown in Figure 8. As the susceptor is tilted up, the velocity above it increases due to the constriction in the channel. The increased velocity increases the Reynold s number, which thins the boundary layer so that the deposition rate goes up. The net effect is to maintain a relatively uniform deposition along x. 

Air at 20 C and 1 aim (lows through a 6-in. vertical duct at a velocity of 20 ft/sec. Plot the transfer coefficient (cm/sec). k, for deposition on the wall as a function of particle size over the range 10 /rm > dp > 0.01 im. Assume that the surface of the duel is smooth and that it acts as a perfect sink for particles. Particle density is 2 g/ctn. Show two branches for the curve diffusion-controlled deposit ion for submicron particles (Chapter 3) and inertia-controlled turbulent deposition for the larger particles. 

Fig. 2.6 Copper deposits obtained from 0.30 M CUSO4 in 0.50 M F12S04 by electrodeposition under mixed activation-diffusion control. Deposition overpotential 220 mV. Quantity of electricity (a) 40 mA h cm, (b) the same as in (a), (c) 10 mA h cm, (d) 10 mA h cm, (e) 20 mA h cm , and (f) the root of the carrot from (e) (Reprinted from Refs. [7, 8, 13] with kind permission from Springer and Ref [20] with permission from the Serbian Chemical Society)...

Dendritic Growth Inside Diffusion Layer of the Active Macroelectrode and Ohmic Diffusion and Activation-Diffusion-Controlled Deposition and Determination of tji and tjc... 

In the first experiment in 2006 (Eichler et al. 2007a, b), a carrier-gas flow of 860 ml/min and a temperature gradient between —24°C and —184°C was applied (O Fig. 20.43). A spontaneous, diffusion-controlled deposition of Hg was observed in the first eleven detectors. Rn deposited almost entirely on the last nine detectors. One decay chain (chain 1) assigned to Cn was observed in the second detector (—28°C) together with Hg, that is, clearly distinct from Rn. 

Ohmic-Diffusion and Activation-Diffusion Controlled Deposition... 

In panel 1 of Fig. 41, the deposition of the nuclide Tn2 = 49 s) (gray bars), produced from an admixture of " Nd to the target material, is shown. Single atoms of Hg show the expected diffusion controlled deposition pattern from irreversible adsorption on the Au surface of the top detectors. Due to the high flow rates, and since only one side of the detector channel was Au covered, the distribution of Hg extends far into the COLD detector. The nuclide Rn (white bars), being produced in transfer reactions, was deposited on the ice surface only at very low temperatures close to the exit of COLD as expected for the noble gas Rn. The deposition patterns of both Hg and Rn could be satisfactorily described by a microscopic model of the adsorption chromatographic process. It was based on a Monte Carlo approach [20] (solid lines) with > 50 kJ-moP and... 

Figure 19.2 shows, at a microscopic level, what is going on. Atoms diffuse from the grain boundary which must form at each neck (since the particles which meet there have different orientations), and deposit in the pore, tending to fill it up. The atoms move by grain boundary diffusion (helped a little by lattice diffusion, which tends to be slower). The reduction in surface area drives the process, and the rate of diffusion controls its rate. This immediately tells us the two most important things we need to know about solid state sintering ... 

By electrodeposition of CuInSe2 thin films on glassy carbon disk substrates in acidic (pH 2) baths of cupric ions and sodium citrate, under potentiostatic conditions [176], it was established that the formation of tetragonal chalcopyrite CIS is entirely prevalent in the deposition potential interval -0.7 to -0.9 V vs. SCE. Through analysis of potentiostatic current transients, it was concluded that electrocrystallization of the compound proceeds according to a 3D progressive nucleation-growth model with diffusion control. 

Spiro [27] has derived quantitative expressions for the catalytic effect of electron conducting catalysts on oxidation-reduction reactions in solution in which the catalyst assumes the Emp imposed on it by the interacting redox couples. When both partial reaction polarization curves in the region of Emp exhibit Tafel type kinetics, he determined that the catalytic rate of reaction will be proportional to the concentrations of the two reactants raised to fractional powers in many simple cases, the power is one. On the other hand, if the polarization curve of one of the reactants shows diffusion-controlled kinetics, the catalytic rate of reaction will be proportional to the concentration of that reactant alone. Electroless metal deposition systems, at least those that appear to obey the MPT model, may be considered to be a special case of the general class of heterogeneously catalyzed reactions treated by Spiro. 

Although electroless deposition seems to offer greater prospects for deposit thickness and composition uniformity than electrodeposition, the achievement of such uniformity is a challenge. An understanding of catalysis and deposition mechanisms, as in Section 3, is inadequate to describe the operation of a practical electroless solution. Solution factors, such as the presence of stabilizers, dissolved O2 gas, and partially-diffusion-controlled, metal ion reduction reactions, often can strongly influence deposit uniformity. In the field of microelectronics, backend-of-line (BEOL) linewidths are approaching 0.1 pm, which is much less than the diffusion layer thickness for a... 

Figure 14 shows a schematic representation of a mixed potential diagram for the electroless deposition reaction. Oxidation of the reductant, in this case hypophos-phite, is considered to be under 100% kinetic control. A mixed kinetic-diffusion curve is shown for the reduction of the metal ion, in our case Co2+, in the region close to the mixed potential, Em. Thus, since Co deposition occurs under a condition of mixed kinetic and diffusion control, features small relative to the diffusion layer thickness for Co2+ will experience a higher concentration of the metal ion, and hence... 

As discussed earlier, it is generally observed that reductant oxidation occurs under kinetic control at least over the potential range of interest to electroless deposition. This indicates that the kinetics, or more specifically, the equivalent partial current densities for this reaction, should be the same for any catalytically active feature. On the other hand, it is well established that the O2 electroreduction reaction may proceed under conditions of diffusion control at a few hundred millivolts potential cathodic of the EIX value for this reaction even for relatively smooth electrocatalysts. This is particularly true for the classic Pd initiation catalyst used for electroless deposition, and is probably also likely for freshly-electrolessly-deposited catalysts such as Ni-P, Co-P and Cu. Thus, when O2 reduction becomes diffusion controlled at a large feature, i.e., one whose dimensions exceed the O2 diffusion layer thickness, the transport of O2 occurs under planar diffusion conditions (except for feature edges). 

The deposition is performed at a potential where the current is diffusion controlled at a steady state. The steady-state diffusion is maintained for a deposition time, t, by stirring the solution, usually with a magnetic stirrer. At the end of the deposition time, the stirrer is turned off for a quiet time, q (about 30 s) while the deposition potential is held. 

Weisz, P. B., and Goodwin, R. D. (1963). Combustion of carbonaceous deposits within porous catalyst particles. I. Diffusion controlled kinetics. J. Catal. 2, 397. 

The possibilities afforded by SAM-controlled electrochemical metal deposition were already demonstrated some time ago by Sondag-Huethorst et al. [36] who used patterned SAMs as templates to deposit metal structures with line widths below 100 nm. While this initial work illustrated the potential of SAM-controlled deposition on the nanometer scale further activities towards technological exploitation have been surprisingly moderate and mostly concerned with basic studies on metal deposition on uniform, alkane thiol-based SAMs [37-40] that have been extended in more recent years to aromatic thiols [41-43]. A major reason for the slow development of this area is that electrochemical metal deposition with, in principle, the advantage of better control via the electrochemical potential compared to none-lectrochemical methods such as electroless metal deposition or evaporation, is quite critical in conjunction with SAMs. Relying on their ability to act as barriers for charge transfer and particle diffusion, the minimization of defects in and control of the structural quality of SAMs are key to their performance and set the limits for their nanotechnological applications. 

Knox, J. B. Numerical modeling of the transport diffusion and deposition of pollutants for r ions and extended scales. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 24 660-664, 1974. 

---