Main term diffusion coefficients

In the framework of Scheme 2.1, we start with the case where the electron transfer does not interfere kinetically. As compared to the simple Nemstian electron transfer case (Section 6.1.2), the main change occurs in die partial derivative equation pertaining to B, where a kinetic term is introduced in Fick s second law. A corresponding equation for C should also be taken into account, leading to the following system of partial derivative equations, accompanied by a series of initial and boundary conditions (assuming that the diffusion coefficients of A, B, and C are the same) ... 

Comparison with (X.2.16) shows the following drastic differences. The dominant term of (X.2.16) is absent and therefore no equation for the macroscopic part of X can be extracted. In other words, on the macroscopic scale the system does not evolve in one direction rather than the other. The remaining evolution of P is merely the net outcome of the fluctuations. Accordingly the time scale of the change is a factor slower than in the preceding case, compare (X.2.14). Since P is not sharply peaked the coefficients a(x) cannot be expanded around some central value but they remain as nonlinear functions in the equation. The first line of (1.4) contains the main terms and is called the diffusion approximation... 

Johnson and Willson interpreted the main feature of the observations on solid polyethylene doped with aromatic solutes in terms of an ionic mechanism it was analogous to that proposed for irradiated frozen glassy-alkane-systems in which ionization occurred with G = 3 — 4 [96], The produced charged species, electron and positive hole, were both mobile as indicated by the radiation-induced conductivity. The production of excited states of aromatic solutes was caused mainly by ion-electron neutralization. The ion-ion recombination was relatively slow but it might contribute to the delayed fluorescence observed. On the basis of Debye-Simoluchovski equation, they evaluated the diffusion coefficients of the radical anion of naphthalene and pyrene as approximately 4 x 10 12 and 1 x 10 12 m2 s 1 respectively the values were about three orders of magnitude less than those found in typical liquid systems. 

Let us now briefly recall the main features of the behavior of D c °°(r) as a function of t for t > 0 [25]. First, the limiting value at infinite time of D ,c, 00(f) is, at any nonzero temperature, the usual Einstein diffusion coefficient kT/rp Above the crossover temperature Tc as defined above, ) e, 00(f) increases monotonously toward its limiting value. Below the crossover temperature (i.e., T < T( ).D"] (t) first increases, then passes through a maximum and finally slowly decreases toward its limiting value. Thus, in the quantum regime, I)" x(t) can exceed its stationary value, and the diffusive regime is only attained very slowly, namely after times t fth- At T - Q.If x(Vj can be expressed in terms of exponential integral functions ... 

Our main focus in computing thermal transport coefficients is calculation of the frequency-dependent energy diffusion coefficient, D go), which appears in Eq. (12). Computation of Dim) is relatively straightforward if we express the vibrations of the object in terms of its normal modes. We shall compute Dim) with wave packets expressed as superpositions of normal modes, which we then filter to a range of frequencies near go to determine D co). 

The set of the above equations leads to a nonlinear problem which can be solved by an iterative numerical technique.47 Substrate concentration profiles, and therefore substrate bulk concentration, are then a function of seven dimensionless parameters X2, z , b/a, d/a, D/D3, DiAy Dj, O. Essential predictions of the model have been estimated by Waterland et al in terms of substrate bulk concentration as a function of X 2, O, and z, the main dimensionless parameters.47 Partition coefficients were kept equal to unity and geometrical parameters were set according to the dimensions of a typical hollow fiber, that is a = 100 pm, b = 100.5 pm, d = 175 pm diffusion coefficients in region 1, 3 and 4 were assumed equal to each other, while the substrate diffusion coefficient in region 2 was assumed one order of magnitude lower. 

In a typical tracer diffusion experiment, the total concentration of labeled and unlabeled solute is uniform throughout the system, so that the fluxes and the local concentration gradients are equal and opposite, and the tracer diffusion coefficient, )a > equal to the main-term diffusion coefficients minus a cross-... 

The procedure of evaluating self-diffusion data in terms of microstructure is to calculate the reduced or normalized diffusion coefficient, D/Dq, for the two solvents. Do being the neat solvent value under the appropriate conditions. Here we also have to account for reductions in D resulting from factors other than microstructure, mainly solvation effects. As discussed above, solvation will lead to a reduction of solvent diffusion that is proportional to the surfactant concentration. Normally the correction has been empirical and based on diffusion studies for cases of established structure, notably micellar solutions. We need to distinguish between corrections due to polar head-water and alkyl chain-oil interactions. The latter have often been considered insignificant, but a closer analysis (either experimental or theoretical) is lacking. However, it is probably reasonable to assume, for example, that the resistance to translation is not very different in the lipophilic part of the surfactant film and in an alkane solution. (This is supported by observations of molecular mobilities of surfactant allQ l chains on the same order of magnitude as for a neat hydrocarbon.)... 

The diagonal elements of D are called the main-term diffusion coefficients and the off-diagonal elements are called the cross-term diffusion coefficients or crossdiffusion terms. The cross-diffusion term liiiks the gradient of species... 

The first term in Eq. (11.38) corresponds to the ratio between space-time and the characteristic axial molecular diffusion time. The molecular diffusion coefficient hes in the order 10 m s for gases and 10 m s for liquids. Typical lengths of MSR are several centimeters and the space-time is in the range of seconds. Therefore, the axial dispersion in microchannels is mainly determined by the second term in Eq. (11.38), where the Bodenstein number can be estimated with Eq. (11.39)... 

It is known that glassy polymer membranes can have a considerable size-sieving character, reflected mainly in the diffusive term of the transport equation. Many studies have therefore attempted to correlate the diffusion coefficient and the membrane permeability with the size of the penetrant molecules, for instance expressed in terms of the kinetic diameter, Lennard-Jones diameter or critical volume [40]. Since the transport takes place through the available free volume in the material, a correlation between the free volume fraction and transport properties should also exist. Through the years, authors have proposed different equations to correlate transport and FFV, starting with the historical model of Cohen and Turnbull for self diffusion [41], later adapted by Fujita for polymer systans [42]. Park and Paul adopted a somewhat simpler form of this equation to correlate the permeability coefficient with fractional free volume [43] ... 

We now wish to illustrate another of the three main consequences of mode-mode coupling mentioned in the introduction, that of the existence of expressions for transport coefiidents in terms of other transport coefficients such expressions could not exist if classical theory held. Of course, the results derived in the previous section are examples of such expressions. However, we wish to discuss cases that have nothing to do with critical phenomena. The best known example of the expressions of interest is the Stokes-Einstein law for the self-diffusion coefficient of a large spherical particle. 

The main effect of changing the cationic component of the ioific liquid was found to be its effect on the solvent viscosity, as the diffusion coefficient (D) of each species was found to be inversely proportional to the viscosity across the series of ionic liquids, in accordance with Stake s equation [16,17], The only deviation from this relationship arose for the case when [P6,6,6,i4][N(Tf)2] was used as the solvent [17]. Here, though relatively normal voltammetry was observed for the oxidation and immediate re-reduction of xxi (first electron transfer in Eq. 15.22), sweeping the potential at a more positive value to promote the formation of the dication, resulted in an anomalous wave shape. This behavior was rationalized in terms of a dimerization reaction between the dication and neutral xxi (Eq. 15.23), with the further dimer oxidation at a potential more positive than that for the first oxidation of the monomer (Eq. 15.24) [17]. 

Since in the macroscale model, the reaction rate and diffusion coefficient are effective ones that are obtained on an ensemble-averaged basis, the internal diffusion will not appear in the controlling equations explicitly. The effective reaction rate already includes the influence of internal diffusion inside catalyst pellets. The external mass transfer term, which mainly accounts for the species transport outside catalyst pellets, is used in the controlling equations in macroscale models. So, the diffusion mentioned in macroscale model normally represents species diffusion outside catalyst pellets. In fluidized bed, species diffusion is closely related to the flow regime in the reactor (Abba et al., 2003). Abba et al. (2003) summarized the formulae for calculating diffusion coefficients in different flow regimes in fluidized bed. 

---