Between time and space

There also exists convincing internal evidence that real Minkowski space must be curved. Euclidean 4-space is commonly represented diagrammati-cally to distinguish between time and space axes as in figure 4. 

The time interval between when a particle has a new collision is At, which will give rise to a mean square displacement. The coupling between time and space in diffusion is seen in Einstein s Diffusion Equation (Eq. 12.6 not to be confused with a number of Einstein s other equations), where he showed that mean square displacement of a molecule is proportional to the time (At) where the proportionality constant is referred to as D, the diffusion coefficient with units of cmVsec. 

In principle, arbitrarily high resolution should be attained by applying sufficiently large gradient intensities g, although the present state of the art of NMR microscopy only allows spatial resolution down to 1 xm [13,14]. One has to note, however, that an increase in the spatial resolution is possible only at the expense of measuring time. Hence for the observation of time-dependent concentration profiles, a compromise between time and space resolution is inevitable. 

The parallelism between time and space is pursued in applying the same concept of reversibility to both. A space distribution of energy can be a source of irreversibility as demonstrated in case study H8 Attenuated Propagation in Chapter 11 dealing with attenuated propagation due to radiation absorption. This is a property of space which is made clearer than in the classical theories. 

Femtosecond studies of caged molecules in nanocavities provide direct information on the relationship between time and space domains of molecular relaxation [3]. Therefore, simple and complex molecular systems have been studied using CD s proteins, micelles, pores and zeolites as nanohosts, demonstrating... 

More generally, the neutron number density and the reactor power distribution are both time- and space-dependent. Also, there is a complex relation between reactor power, heat removal, and reactivity. 

However, a preference relation between such schemes is some consensus of opinion. The reader can encounter in the theory and practice various schemes generating approximations of order 2 in time and space ... 

The need for coordinated monitoring studies spanning several environmental compartments through time and space, and the need for cormnon sampling and analytical protocols this is particularly important when striving to establish links between mercury emissions and methylmercury levels in biota... 

Input Errors. Errors in model input often constitute one of the most significant causes of discrepancies between observed data and model predictions. As shown in Figure 2, the natural system receives the "true" input (usually as a "driving function") whereas the model receives the "observed" input as detected by some measurement method or device. Whenever a measurement is made possible source of error is introduced. System inputs usually vary continuously both in space and time, whereas measurements are usually point values, or averages of multiple point values, and for a particular time or accumulated over a time period. Although continuous measurement devices are in common use, errors are still possible, and essentially all models require transformation of a continuous record into discrete time and space scales acceptable to the model formulation and structure. 

System Representation Errors. System representation errors refer to differences in the processes and the time and space scales represented in the model, versus those that determine the response of the natural system. In essence, these errors are the major ones of concern when one asks "How good is the model ". Whenever comparing model output with observed data in an attempt to evaluate model capabilities, the analyst must have an understanding of the major natural processes, and human impacts, that influence the observed data. Differences between model output and observed data can then be analyzed in light of the limitations of the model algorithm used to represent a particularly critical process, and to insure that all such critical processes are modeled to some appropriate level of detail. For example, a... 

Porosity correction is constant in both time and space. Chemicals move between the three soil phases much more rapidly than they diffuse in the air phase. This means that they appear to be in equilibrium. Adsorption is reversible. 

The link between the ecological/ecotoxicological risk assessment and the risk management frameworks is demonstrated. The ecological risk assessment consists of seven interactive elements (Fig. 17). The quantitative and descriptive science used to conduct ERA (Table 5) does not answer, in a direct way, the question of what should be done to manage the risk. Science determines adversity, but the public determines acceptability (Fig. 18). But acceptable risk is a highly subjective and relative term. It is time and space-specific and depends upon definitions of quality of life and robustness of the environment. 

In LGCA models, time and space are discrete this means that the model system is defined on a lattice and the state of the automaton is only defined at regular points in time with separation St. The distance between nearest-neighbor sites in the lattice is denoted by 5/. At discrete times, particles with mass m are situated at the lattice sites with b possible velocities ch where i e 1, 2,. .., b. The set c can be chosen in many different ways, although they are restricted by the constraint that... 

A very important contribution in this socio-technical era is made by Reason (Reason, 1990). He made a distinction between active failures, and latent conditions. The active failures are in general failures made by those at the sharp end of the accident causation (e.g. technical and human failures). Effects are felt almost immediately. Latent conditions are removed in time and space from the sharp end of the accident causation (e.g. organizational and technical failures) creating conditions for active failures to be made. A strict boundary between both concepts cannot be made and in reality can be seen as a sort of sliding transition. Here, the two concepts are separated... 

The presence of a low-viscosity interfacial layer makes the determination of the boundary condition even more difficult because the location of a slip plane becomes blurred. Transitional layers have been discussed in the previous section, but this is an approximate picture, since it stiU requires the definition of boundary conditions between the interfacial layers. A more accurate picture, at least from a mesoscopic standpoint, would include a continuous gradient of material properties, in the form of a viscoelastic transition from the sohd surface to the purely viscous liquid. Due to limitations of time and space, models of transitional gradient layers will be left for a future article. 

The three-step model was developed as a consequence of the extreme complexity of a PBC system. This author had a wish to describe the PBC-process as simple as possible and to define the main objectives of a PBC system. The main objectives of a PBC system are indicated by the efficiencies of each unit operation, that is, the conversion efficiency, the combustion efficiency, and the boiler efficiency. The advantage of the three-step model, as with any steady-state system theory, is that it presents a clear overview of the major objectives and relationships between main process flows of a PBC system. The disadvantage of a system theory is the low resolution, that is, the physical quantity of interest cannot be differentiated with respect to time and space. A partial differential theory of each subsystem is required to obtain higher resolution. However, a steady-state approach is often good enough. 

---