Diffiisivity

If we suppose the medium is composed of a known part (the background) identified by the density po and the celerity co, and an unknown part (the perturbation) identified by p and c, the equation that describes acoustic propagation/diffiision phenomena in the medium (including the boundary and Sommerfeld conditions) result from the Pekeris equation and is given, for weak-scattering (pc poCo), by ... 

The atoms on the outennost surface of a solid are not necessarily static, particularly as the surface temperature is raised. There has been much theoretical [12, 13] and experimental work (described below) undertaken to investigate surface self-diffiision. These studies have shown that surfaces actually have dynamic, changing stmetures. For example, atoms can diflfiise along a terrace to or from step edges. When atoms diflfiise across a surface, they may move by hopping from one surface site to the next, or by exchanging places with second layer atoms. 

More recently, studies employing STM have been able to address surface self-diffiision across a terrace [16, 17. 18 and 19], It is possible to image the same area on a surface as a fiinction of time, and watch the movement of individual atoms. These studies are limited only by the speed of the instrument. Note that the performance of STM instruments is constantly improving, and has now surpassed the 1 ps time resolution mark [20]. Not only has self-diflfiision of surface atoms been studied, but the diflfiision of vacancy defects on surfaces has also been observed with STM [18]. 

Now eonsider two systems that are in thennal and diffiisive eontaet, sueh that there ean be sharing of both energy and partieles between the two. Again let I be the system and II be a mueh larger reservoir. Sinee the eomposite system is isolated, one has the situation in whieh the volume of eaeh of the two are fixed at V and V", respeetively, and the total energy and total number of partieles are shared Ej = + /i - -where / = (/, /")... 

This example illustrates how the Onsager theory may be applied at the macroscopic level in a self-consistent maimer. The ingredients are the averaged regression equations and the entropy. Together, these quantities pennit the calculation of the fluctuating force correlation matrix, Q. Diffusion is used here to illustrate the procedure in detail because diffiision is the simplest known case exlribiting continuous variables. 

Due to the conservation law, the diffiision field 5 j/ relaxes in a time much shorter than tlie time taken by significant interface motion. If the domain size is R(x), the difhision field relaxes over a time scale R Flowever a typical interface velocity is shown below to be R. Thus in time Tq, interfaces move a distanc of about one, much smaller compared to R. This implies that the difhision field 6vj is essentially always in equilibrium with tlie interfaces and, thus, obeys Laplace s equation... 

To derive tire boundary condition, it is better to work with the chemical potential instead of the diffiision field. We have... 

The introductory remarks about unimolecular reactions apply equivalently to bunolecular reactions in condensed phase. An essential additional phenomenon is the effect the solvent has on the rate of approach of reactants and the lifetime of the collision complex. In a dense fluid the rate of approach evidently is detennined by the mutual difhision coefficient of reactants under the given physical conditions. Once reactants have met, they are temporarily trapped in a solvent cage until they either difhisively separate again or react. It is conmron to refer to the pair of reactants trapped in the solvent cage as an encounter complex. If the unimolecular reaction of this encounter complex is much faster than diffiisive separation i.e., if the effective reaction barrier is sufficiently small or negligible, tlie rate of the overall bimolecular reaction is difhision controlled. 

There is one important caveat to consider before one starts to interpret activation volumes in temis of changes of structure and solvation during the reaction the pressure dependence of the rate coefficient may also be caused by transport or dynamic effects, as solvent viscosity, diffiision coefficients and relaxation times may also change with pressure [2]. Examples will be given in subsequent sections. 

R), i.e. there is no effect due to caging of the encounter complex in the common solvation shell. There exist numerous modifications and extensions of this basic theory that not only involve different initial and boundary conditions, but also the inclusion of microscopic structural aspects [31]. Among these are hydrodynamic repulsion at short distances that may be modelled, for example, by a distance-dependent diffiision coefficient... 

Diflfiision-controlled reactions between ions in solution are strongly influenced by the Coulomb interaction accelerating or retarding ion diffiision. In this case, die dififiision equation for p concerning motion of one reactant about the other stationary reactant, the Debye-Smoluchowski equation. 

Many additional refinements have been made, primarily to take into account more aspects of the microscopic solvent structure, within the framework of diffiision models of bimolecular chemical reactions that encompass also many-body and dynamic effects, such as, for example, treatments based on kinetic theory [35]. One should keep in mind, however, that in many cases die practical value of these advanced theoretical models for a quantitative analysis or prediction of reaction rate data in solution may be limited. 

In liquid solution. Brownian motion theory provides the relation between diffiision and friction coefficient... 

In the Smoluchowski limit, one usually assumes that the Stokes-Einstein relation (Dq//r7)a = C holds, which fonns the basis of taking the solvent viscosity as a measure for the zero-frequency friction coefficient appearing in Kramers expressions. Here C is a constant whose exact value depends on the type of boundary conditions used in deriving Stokes law. It follows that the diffiision coefficient ratio is given by ... 

As with the other surface reactions discussed above, the steps m a catalytic reaction (neglecting diffiision) are as follows the adsorption of reactant molecules or atoms to fomi bound surface species, the reaction of these surface species with gas phase species or other surface species and subsequent product desorption. The global reaction rate is governed by the slowest of these elementary steps, called the rate-detemiming or rate-limiting step. In many cases, it has been found that either the adsorption or desorption steps are rate detemiining. It is not surprising, then, that the surface stmcture of the catalyst, which is a variable that can influence adsorption and desorption rates, can sometimes affect the overall conversion and selectivity. 

Diflfiisive processes nonnally operate in chemical systems so as to disperse concentration gradients. In a paper in 1952, the mathematician Alan Turing produced a remarkable prediction [37] that if selective diffiision were coupled with chemical feedback, the opposite situation may arise, with a spontaneous development of sustained spatial distributions of species concentrations from initially unifonn systems. Turmg s paper was set in the context of the development of fonn (morphogenesis) in embryos, and has been adopted in some studies of animal coat markings. With the subsequent theoretical work at Brussels [1], it became clear that oscillatory chemical systems should provide a fertile ground for the search for experimental examples of these Turing patterns. 

Motion, and in particular diffiision, causes a further limit to resolution [14,15]. First, there is a physical limitation caused by spins diflfiising into adjacent voxels durmg the acquisition of a transient. For water containing samples at room temperature the optimal resolution on these grounds is about 5 pm. However, as will be seen in subsequent sections, difhision of nuclei in a magnetic field gradient causes an additional... 

Escaped radicals diffiise to region II, where J is negligible, and may undergo. S-Jq mixmg as described previously. From region II, the radicals may follow any of tliree different pathways. 

The solution flow is nomially maintained under laminar conditions and the velocity profile across the chaimel is therefore parabolic with a maximum velocity occurring at the chaimel centre. Thanks to the well defined hydrodynamic flow regime and to the accurately detemiinable dimensions of the cell, the system lends itself well to theoretical modelling. The convective-diffiision equation for mass transport within the rectangular duct may be described by... 

---