Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Potential differences

There are complicating issues in defmmg pseudopotentials, e.g. the pseudopotential in equation Al.3.78 is state dependent, orbitally dependent and the energy and spatial separations between valence and core electrons are sometimes not transparent. These are not insunnoimtable issues. The state dependence is usually weak and can be ignored. The orbital dependence requires different potentials for different angular momentum components. This can be incorporated via non-local operators. The distinction between valence and core states can be addressed by incorporating the core level in question as part of the valence shell. For... [Pg.112]

The central dynamical object that enters mto the polarization are the coherences of the fonn ( / t) p vj/ i(t)) and etc. These quantities are overlaps between wavepackets moving on different potential... [Pg.254]

Theories based on the solution to integral equations for the pair correlation fiinctions are now well developed and widely employed in numerical and analytic studies of simple fluids [6]. Furtlier improvements for simple fluids would require better approximations for the bridge fiinctions B(r). It has been suggested that these fiinctions can be scaled to the same fiinctional fomi for different potentials. The extension of integral equation theories to molecular fluids was first accomplished by Chandler and Andersen [30] through the introduction of the site-site direct correlation fiinction c r) between atoms in each molecule and a site-site Omstein-Zemike relation called the reference interaction site... [Pg.480]

One current limitation of orbital-free DFT is that since only the total density is calculated, there is no way to identify contributions from electronic states of a certain angular momentum character /. This identification is exploited in non-local pseudopotentials so that electrons of different / character see different potentials, considerably improving the quality of these pseudopotentials. The orbital-free metliods thus are limited to local pseudopotentials, connecting the quality of their results to the quality of tlie available local potentials. Good local pseudopotentials are available for the alkali metals, the alkaline earth metals and aluminium [100. 101] and methods exist for obtaining them for other atoms (see section VI.2 of [97]). [Pg.2218]

Figure B3.6.3. Sketch of the coarse-grained description of a binary blend in contact with a wall, (a) Composition profile at the wall, (b) Effective interaction g(l) between the interface and the wall. The different potentials correspond to complete wettmg, a first-order wetting transition and the non-wet state (from above to below). In case of a second-order transition there is no double-well structure close to the transition, but g(l) exhibits a single minimum which moves to larger distances as the wetting transition temperature is approached from below, (c) Temperature dependence of the thickness / of the enriclnnent layer at the wall. The jump of the layer thickness indicates a first-order wetting transition. In the case of a conthuious transition the layer thickness would diverge continuously upon approaching from below. Figure B3.6.3. Sketch of the coarse-grained description of a binary blend in contact with a wall, (a) Composition profile at the wall, (b) Effective interaction g(l) between the interface and the wall. The different potentials correspond to complete wettmg, a first-order wetting transition and the non-wet state (from above to below). In case of a second-order transition there is no double-well structure close to the transition, but g(l) exhibits a single minimum which moves to larger distances as the wetting transition temperature is approached from below, (c) Temperature dependence of the thickness / of the enriclnnent layer at the wall. The jump of the layer thickness indicates a first-order wetting transition. In the case of a conthuious transition the layer thickness would diverge continuously upon approaching from below.
For this reason, there has been much work on empirical potentials suitable for use on a wide range of systems. These take a sensible functional form with parameters fitted to reproduce available data. Many different potentials, known as molecular mechanics (MM) potentials, have been developed for ground-state organic and biochemical systems [58-60], They have the advantages of simplicity, and are transferable between systems, but do suffer firom inaccuracies and rigidity—no reactions are possible. Schemes have been developed to correct for these deficiencies. The empirical valence bond (EVB) method of Warshel [61,62], and the molecular mechanics-valence bond (MMVB) of Bemardi et al. [63,64] try to extend MM to include excited-state effects and reactions. The MMVB Hamiltonian is parameterized against CASSCF calculations, and is thus particularly suited to photochemistry. [Pg.254]

Additionally, as in all Tl-based approaches, the free energy differences are linear functions of the potential. Thus non-rigorous decompositions may be made into contributions from the different potential energy terms, parts of system and individual coordinates, providing valuable insight into the molecular mechanisms of studied processes [8, 9, 10). [Pg.166]

A common application of the direct calculation of molecular energy is the study of organic reaction mechanisms. You can investigate the energies of different potential intermediates, species not easily studied by experiment. A review by Thiel lists many such 39. Thiel, W. Semiempirical Methods Current Status and Perspectives Tetrahedron, 44 7393, 1988. [Pg.131]

It is estimated that mote than 25 x 10 different potentially toxic OP esters can be made using Schrader s classic (27) formula for effective phosphorylating agents, (39), where R and are short-chain alkyl, alkoxy, alkylthio, or alkylamino groups, and X is a displaceable moiety with a high energy P-bond such as E or acyl anhydride, and the pentavalent phosphoms atom is bonded to oxygen or sulfur. [Pg.279]

In practice, elimination of axial current flow requires relatively fine segmentation, eg, 1—2 cm, between electrodes, which means that a utihty-sized generator contains several hundred electrode pairs. Thus, one of the costs paid for the increased performance is the larger number of components and increased mechanical complexity compared to the two-terrninal Faraday generator. Another cost is incurred by the increased complexity of power collection, in that outputs from several hundred terminals at different potentials must be consoHdated into one set of terminals, either at an inverter or at the power grid. [Pg.416]

Transport processes describe movement of the pesticide from one location to another or from one phase to another. Transport processes include both downward leaching, surface mnoff, volatilization from the soil to the atmosphere, as weU as upward movement by capillary water to the soil surface. Transport processes do not affect the total amount of pesticide in the environment however, they can move the pesticide to sites that have different potentials for degradation. Transport processes also redistribute the pesticide in the environment, possibly contaminating sites away from the site of apphcation such as surface and groundwater and the atmosphere. Transport of pesticides is a function of both retention and transport processes. [Pg.219]

As in the case of corrosion at the insulating connection due to different potentials caused by cathodic protection of the pipeline, there is a danger if the insulating connection is fitted between two sections of a pipeline with different materials, e.g., mild and stainless steel. The difference between the external pipe/soil potential is changed by cell currents so that the difference between the internal pipe/ medium potential has the same value, i.e., both potential differences become equal. If the latter is lower than the former for the case of free corrosion, the part of the pipe with the material that has the more positive rest potential in the soil is polarized anodically on the inner surface. The danger increases with external cathodic protection in the part of the pipeline made of mild steel. [Pg.282]

This is a transient discrete electric discharge which takes place between two conductors which are at different potentials, bridging the gap in the form of a single ionization channel (Plate 4). Based on light emission measurements of sparks with symmetrical electrode geometry, the energy is dissipated approximately uniformly along the channel. This is in contrast with asym-... [Pg.35]

Atomic and molecular magnetic dipoles have to obey the angular momentum laws of quantum mechanics, since they are proportional to angular momenta. Each dipole can therefore make just a number of orientations with an applied magnetic induction B. Each allowed orientation corresponds to a different potential energy, and absorption of a photon with suitable energy may cause a change in orientation. [Pg.307]

Assume now that two different external potentials (which may be from nuclei), Vext and Vgjjj, result in the same electron density, p. Two different potentials imply that the two Hamilton operators are different, H and H, and the corresponding lowest energy wave functions are different, and Taking as an approximate wave function for H and using the variational principle yields... [Pg.408]

Scheme 5.2-2 Different potential routes for in situ ligand formation from an imidazolium... Scheme 5.2-2 Different potential routes for in situ ligand formation from an imidazolium...
Both metals are applied to copper-base alloys, stainless steels and titanium to stop bimetallic corrosion at contacts between these metals and aluminium and magnesium alloys, and their application to non-stainless steel can serve this purpose as well as protecting the steel. In spite of their different potentials, zinc and cadmium appear to be equally effective for this purpose, even for contacts with magnesium alloys Choice between the two metals will therefore be made on the other grounds previously discussed. [Pg.484]

Fig. 19.22 Linear correlation between difference potential and the mass loss obtained for various stainless alloys containing a crevice, and after exposure to sea-water for 4y years... Fig. 19.22 Linear correlation between difference potential and the mass loss obtained for various stainless alloys containing a crevice, and after exposure to sea-water for 4y years...
The challenge in the synthesis of chemical libraries is the vast number of different, potentially drug-like small molecules which is estimated to be as high as 1060. As all of these molecules can never be synthesized and tested, it is essential to define criteria for the composition of libraries spanning the biologically relevant areas of the chemical space most efficiently. An important criterion of a compound library is its chemical diversity, a term describing the similarity or dissimilarity of all library components. Thus, chemical diversity expresses how well a library represents all theoretical possibilities within the chemical property space. A library with low... [Pg.382]

FIGURE 3-27 Three-dimensional chromatogram for oxidizable biological compounds at a multichannel amperometric detection system, consisting of an array of 16 carbon-paste electrodes held at different potentials. AA = ascorbic acid NE = norepinephrine DOPAC = 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid 5-HIAA = 5-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid DA = dopamine HVA = homovanillic acid. (Reproduced with permission from reference 68.)... [Pg.94]


See other pages where Potential differences is mentioned: [Pg.207]    [Pg.1045]    [Pg.2269]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.1268]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.731]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.652]    [Pg.473]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.1268]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.1187]    [Pg.1377]    [Pg.1048]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.172]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.19 , Pg.74 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.19 , Pg.74 ]




SEARCH



A Appendix 1—Terminal Potential Difference

Absolute potential differences

Batteries potential differences

Cathodic protection potential difference

Cell potential difference, calculation

Chemical stimulation potential difference

Compensation potential difference

Contact difference of potential

Contact potential difference

Contact potential difference measurements

Controlled potential difference electrolysis

Controlled potential difference electrolysis interface

Current potential difference

Definitions and Approximations Associated with Different Types of Potential Energy Curves

Difference mass spectrum, potential energy

Difference of Potential

Difference potential analysis

Difference potentials, spin-orbit operators

Differences in electrical potentials

Differences in membrane potential

Donnan potential difference

Driving forces electrical potential differences

Driving potential difference

Driving potential difference solution

Electric potential difference

Electrical potentials, differences

Electrochemical cell electric potential difference generated

Electrochemical potential difference

Electrochemical potential difference oxidative phosphorylation

Electrochemical potentials, interfacial potential differences

Electrode potentials different

Electromotive force Galvani potential difference

Electromotive force electrochemical potential difference

Electromotive potential difference

Enthalpy potential difference

Equilibrium electrode potential difference

Equilibrium potential difference

Experimental Measurement of the Volta Potential Difference at Interfaces

Finite difference Coulombic potential

Frumkin electrical potential difference

Galvani potential difference

Galvani potential difference electrolyte

Galvani potential difference semiconductor

Galvani potential difference, interface between

Glass electrodes potential difference

Half-Wave Potential for the Different Cases

Individual interface differences potential

Inner layer potential difference

Inner potential difference

Interfacial Potential Differences (Galvani Potentials)

Interfacial potential difference

Interfacial potential difference interface

Interfacial potential difference liquid interface

Interfacial potential difference partition equilibrium

Interfacial potential differences measurement

Interfacial potential differences phase potentials, physics

Interfadal potential difference

Inverted potential difference

Ionization potentials /system difference

Junction Potentials between Different Solvents

Layer Potential Difference and Capacitance

Liquid junction potential between different solvents

Membrane potential difference

Membrane potentials transmembrane potential difference

Metal-electrolyte interface contact potentials difference

Metal-electrolyte potential difference

Metal-solution potential difference

Metal/solution interface potential difference

Mulliken difference potential

Nemst potential difference

Nerve cell potential difference

Normal potential difference

Outer potential difference

Polarization-modulation potential difference

Potential Difference A Measurements

Potential Drops in Different Phases of the Current Path

Potential difference IR spectroscopy

Potential difference Precipitation, possibility

Potential difference across the

Potential difference across the interface

Potential difference between dropping

Potential difference between two contacting phases

Potential difference between two phases

Potential difference direction

Potential difference magnitude

Potential difference relative

Potential difference source

Potential difference units

Potential difference, electrical work done and AG for the cell reaction

Potential difference, measurement

Potential differences at interfaces

Potential differences between organic liquids and aqueous solutions

Potential differences conditions

Potential differences, Gibbs, Helmholtz

Potential differences, liquid junction

Potential differences, liquid junction potentials

Potential energy difference

Potential-difference infrared

Potential-difference infrared spectroscopy

Potentials, Surface Potential Differences, and the Thermionic Work Function

Proton chemical potential difference

Rebar corrosion potential difference

Reduced standard-state chemical potential difference

Semiconductor-solution interface potential difference

Separation Based on Chemical Potential Difference (Concentration Gradient)

Specific Features in Potential-Difference IR Spectra of Electrode-Electrolyte Interfaces

Spectroscopic measurements of the transmembrane potential difference

Standard Chemical Potential and Activity Coefficient on Different Concentration Scales

Standard potential difference

Surface potential difference

Tafel electrical potential difference

Test gases, potential differences

The Galvani potential difference

The Volta potential difference

Total protonic potential difference

Transepithelial potential difference

Transition time, potential difference

Transmembrane potential difference

Transmembrane potential difference electrode measurement

Transmembrane potential difference principles

Ultrasonic vibration, potential differences

Volta potential difference

Volta potential difference experimental determination

Volta potential difference metal solution interface

Voltage Potential difference between two

Zero-Charge Potential Difference

© 2019 chempedia.info