Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Transition time, potential difference

Study of the charge-transfer processes (step 3 above), free of the effects of mass transport, is possible by the use of transient techniques. In the transient techniques the interface at equilibrium is changed from an equilibrium state to a steady state characterized by a new potential difference A(/>. Analysis of the time dependence of this transition is the basis of transient electrochemical techniques. We will discuss galvanostatic and potentiostatic transient techniques for other techniques [e.g., alternating current (ac)], the reader is referred to Refs. 50 to 55. [Pg.103]

The potential response of the RDE to current steps has been treated analytically [3, 237, 251] and accurately by Hale using numerical integration [252] this enables the elucidation of kinetic parameters [185, 253]. A current density—transition time relationship at the RDE has been established which accounts for observed differences from the Sand equation [eqn. (218)] and which has been applied to EC reactions [254]. Other hydrodynamic solid electrodes have not been considered in detail, although reversible reactions at channel electrodes have been discussed [255, 256]. [Pg.429]

The surface-hopping trajectories obtained in the adiabatic representation of the QCLE contain nonadiabatic transitions between potential surfaces including both single adiabatic potential surfaces and the mean of two adiabatic surfaces. This picture is qualitatively different from surface-hopping schemes [2,56] which make the ansatz that classical coordinates follow some trajectory, R(t), while the quantum subsystem wave function, expanded in the adiabatic basis, is evolved according to the time dependent Schrodinger equation. The potential surfaces that the classical trajectories evolve along correspond to one of the adiabatic surfaces used in the expansion of the subsystem wavefunction, while the subsystem evolution is carried out coherently and may develop into linear combinations of these states. In such schemes, the environment does not experience the force associated with the true quantum state of the subsystem and decoherence by the environment is not automatically taken into account. Nonetheless, these methods have provided com-... [Pg.399]

The electron impact ionization of a molecule M to give a molecular ion in the ground and excited electronic states (respectively M + and M,+ ) occurs over a very short time. An electron accelerated by a 10 V potential difference has a speed equal to 1.88 x 108 cm s-1. It thus flies a distance of 1.88 A, or 1.88 x 10 8 cm, in 10 16s. This time is the interaction time of an ionizing electron with a molecule. The ionization must occur within that period. This is verified experimentally. This ionization is thus a vertical transition. The process is much more rapid than the time of one vibration, which is about 10-14 s in the case of the fastest ones. The distances between atoms thus do not change during the ionization. [Pg.276]

How can such ordering processes be influenced and steered into a particular direction Electrochemistry is particularly useful in this respect, since the free energy of the surface system is directly correlated with the electrochemical potential. A simple variation of the electrochemical potential changes the state of the system and may eventually drive a transition into a different surface phase. The electrochemical potential can in general be varied very rapidly, just limited by the time constant of the electrochemical cell, which is given by the capacity of the electrodes electrochemical double layer and the electrolyte resistance [10]. [Pg.236]

Fig. 16. Moves used to equilibrate coil configurations for the self-avoiding walk model of polymer chains on the simple cubic lattice (upper party end rotations, kinkjump motions and crankshaft rotations f 107]. From time to time these local moves alternate with a move (lower pan) where one attempts to replace an A-chain by a B-chain in an identical coil configuration, or vice versa. In the transition probability of this move, the chemical potential difference Ap as well as the energy change SjF enter. From Binder [2S8]... Fig. 16. Moves used to equilibrate coil configurations for the self-avoiding walk model of polymer chains on the simple cubic lattice (upper party end rotations, kinkjump motions and crankshaft rotations f 107]. From time to time these local moves alternate with a move (lower pan) where one attempts to replace an A-chain by a B-chain in an identical coil configuration, or vice versa. In the transition probability of this move, the chemical potential difference Ap as well as the energy change SjF enter. From Binder [2S8]...

See other pages where Transition time, potential difference is mentioned: [Pg.5]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.500]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.538]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.700]    [Pg.588]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.212]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.332 ]




SEARCH



Difference potential

Transit time

Transition time

© 2024 chempedia.info