Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Desulfurization pyritic

Beyer et al. (49) found that, during microbial desulfurization, pyritic sulfur decreases and elemental sulfur increases with time, whereas the organic sulfur remains unchanged. They suggested that microbial oxidation of pyrite produces ferric sulfate [Fe2(S04)3] and that the simultaneous inorganic reaction of ferric iron with pyrite produces elemental sulfur and ferrous iron, as follows ... [Pg.40]

Oxidative Desulfurization Process. Oxidative desulfurization of finely ground coal, originally developed by The Chemical Constmction Co. (27,28), is achieved by converting the sulfur to a water-soluble form with air oxidation at 150—220°C under 1.5—10.3 MPa (220—1500 psi) pressure. More than 95% of the pyritic sulfur and up to 40% of the organic sulfur can be removed by this process. [Pg.257]

Shell s microbiological desulfurization process is carried out by mixing coal with an aqueous biocatalyst solution [158], The coal considered in this invention concerns bituminous coal containing inorganic sulfur (pyritic).This process seems to be applicable to refinery pet-coke, which contains sulfur in the form of inorganic sulfides. Nowadays, when coke has become one of the major products of heavy oil and bitumens refining, such desulfurization processes might have potential uses. [Pg.357]

SULF-X [Sulfur extraction] A regenerable flue-gas desulfurization process in which the sulfur dioxide is absorbed by aqueous sodium sulfide in a bed packed with pyrite. Ferrous sulfate is produced this is removed by centrifugation and calcined with coke and fresh pyrite. Sulfur vapor is evolved and condensed, and the residue is re-used in the scrubber. Piloted in the mid-1980s. Not to be confused with Sulfex or Sulph-X. [Pg.260]

TRW Meyers [Named after the three CalTech professors who founded the company Thompson, Ramo, and Wooldridge] A chemical method for desulfurizing coal. The iron pyrites is leached out with a hot aqueous solution of ferric sulfate, liberating elemental sulfur. The resulting ferrous sulfate solution is re-oxidized with air or oxygen ... [Pg.275]

Rudimentary investigations of microbial desulfurization have received little attention in the literature at this time (2). One successful example of desulfurization is the removal of pyrite from coal by Thiobacillus sp. and Ferrobaccus sp. (3). While studies of the complex hydrocarbon-sulfur systems are of great value, being closer to in situ reality, investigation of a defined system should form the foundation of these more detailed studies. [Pg.142]

In a coal desulfurization study, Narayan et al. (50) were able to extract an appreciable amount of elemental sulfur (36% of total sulfur) with perchloroethylene at 120 °C from weathered coal, but not from fresh coal. Hackley et al. (51) determined the isotopic composition of elemental sulfur extracted by perchloroethylene and obtained results consistent with the interpretation that the elemental sulfur originates from the oxidation of pyrite. [Pg.40]

The types of sulfur in coal, as well as their distribution and reactivity, have a profound impact on the efficiency of desulfurization processes. For practicality, coal sulfur forms are commonly classified as sulfate sulfur, pyritic sulfur, and organic sulfur. Pyritic and organic sulfur account for almost all the sulfur in coals. Sulfate sulfur is usually much less than 0.1% in freshly mined coals, and increases as the coals are exposed to the atmosphere or "weather". [Pg.234]

Further developments of the work include a more accurate study of the mechanisms of desulfurization processes using instrumental improvements. This will enable an easy quantitation of gas yield and a thermochemical approach of elemental processes. We also have been using model polymers to better study the interactions of pyrite and sulfur with the organic matrix during coal pyrolysis, oxidation and combustion (34 and to examine more accurately the specific role of organic sulfur in thermal degradation processes. [Pg.365]

The full potential for removing pyritic sulfur from various coals by physical coal cleaning is significant but difficult to achieve. However, SO2 control by precombustion removal of pyrite could be an important S02-emissions reduction strategy. The cleaned coal produced could be used in coal-fired utilities, constructed both pre-and post-NSPS, as well as in industrial boilers. To realize the potential for coal cleaning in actual practice, however, new techniques must be demonstrated in the laboratory and then at the "proof-of-concept" scale (approximately one ton of coal per hour). These new coal beneficiation techniques could be advanced physical-coal-cleaning (PCC) processes, or they could employ microbial desulfurization or chemical desulfurization to remove organic sulfur. These latter processes could be used by themselves or in concert with PCC processes. [Pg.24]

Sulfur forms analyses on the product solids are not reported here, since results of the ASTM standard procedure can be misleading in terms of Indicating which type of sulfur (pyritic, sulfate, organic) has been removed. Typically, both sulfate and pyritic sulfur are Indicated to be present in low concentrations (generally less than 0.2%) when the ASTM procedure is applied to the solid product from supercritical desulfurization of coal with alcohols. [Pg.86]

Figure 2. Comparison of ethyl and methyl alcohols as supercritical desulfurization fluids, for coals of varied organic sulfur/ pyritic sulfur ratio, (ethanol -------, methanol — —)... Figure 2. Comparison of ethyl and methyl alcohols as supercritical desulfurization fluids, for coals of varied organic sulfur/ pyritic sulfur ratio, (ethanol -------, methanol — —)...
Hoffman et al. (18) conducted a parametric study to determine the effect of bacterial strain, N/P molar ratio, the partial pressure of CO2, the coal source and the total reactive surface area on the rate and extent of oxidative dissolution of iron pyrite at a fixed oxygen pressure. The bacterial desulfurization of high pyritic sulfur coal could be achieved in 8 to 12 days for pulp densities upto 20% and particle size of less than 7 um. The most effective strains of T. ferrooxidans were isolated from the natural systems, and the most effective nutrient medium contained low phosphate levels, with an optimal N/P molar ratio of 90 1. [Pg.94]

Mechanism of Microbial Desulfurization. The microbial dissolution of pyritic sulfur in coal by acidophilic bacteria has been thoroughly investigated (17,18,29). The pyrite is readily oxidized by oxygen or ferric ion, resulting in the ferrous state as follows ... [Pg.94]

Most microbial desulfurization studies have been conducted in the laboratory shake-flask type experiments, and the major drawback cited against such a process has been that the rates of pyritic sulfur removal were not high enough to reduce the reactor size to a reasonable capacity (2,6). In this study an attempt has been made to determine the effectiveness of T. ferrooxidans under simulated pipeline conditions for pyritic sulfur removal. Since the microbial desulfurization process is conducted under acidic environment, an attempt has been made to determine the corrosion rates under dynamic conditions using Illinois //6 and Indiana 3 bituminous coals and to investigate the effectiveness of a commercial corrosion inhibitor for controlling the corrosivity. [Pg.95]

Another slurry pipeline desulfurization experiment was conducted using Indiana 3 (Ayrshire) coal as a 25 wt% slurry in deionized water. The other process variables were carefully controlled flow rates 6-6.5 ft/sec, temperature 70-90°F, and pH 2.5 -2 8.The experiment was continued for 14 days, and the slurry samples for pyritic sulfur determination were taken daily. The desulfurization rates with Indiana 3 coal in the pipeline experiment are shown in Table 4 and are in good agreement with the laboratory data and the results with Illinois 6 coal. As observed in the laboratory experiments, the rate of desulfurization of bituminous coals is directly proportional to the pyritic sulfur content and inversely to the particle size of the coal sample. [Pg.99]

About 80% pyritic sulfur removal has been achieved by microbial desulfurization of Illinois 6 and Indiana 3 coals using T. ferrooxidans in laboratory shake-flask experiments and in a two-inch pipeline loop. The 10 to 25 wt% coal/water slurry was recirculated at 6-7 ft/sec for 7 to 12 days at 70-90°F. Results also show that the rates of bacterial desulfurization are higher in the pipeline loop under turbulent flow conditions for particle sizes, 43 to 200/m as compared to the shake-flask experiments. It is visualized that the proposed coal slurry pipelines could be used as biological plug flow reactors under aerobic conditions. The laboratory corrosion studies show that use of a corrosion inhibitor will limit the pipeline corrosion rates to acceptable levels. [Pg.99]

Figure 1. Effect of particle size on pyritic desulfurization. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. 30. Copyright 1985, American Institute of Chemical Engineers.)... Figure 1. Effect of particle size on pyritic desulfurization. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. 30. Copyright 1985, American Institute of Chemical Engineers.)...
Days Pyritic Sulfur, wt% Pyritic Sulfur Rate of Desulfurization... [Pg.101]


See other pages where Desulfurization pyritic is mentioned: [Pg.438]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.99]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.93 ]




SEARCH



Pyrit

Pyrite

Pyrite microbial desulfurization

Pyritization

© 2024 chempedia.info