Deriving Thermodynamic Formulas

Methods of Deriving Thermodynamic Formulas.—We have now introduced all the thermodynamic variables that we shall meet P, W T, S, i/, H, A, G. The number of partial derivatives which can be formed 

We have already seen that there are a number of differential relations of the form 

We have already seen in Eq. (2.6) how we can obtain formulas from such an expression. We can divide by the differential of one variable, say du, and indicate that the process is at constant value of another, say w. Thus we have 

In doing this wft-miJHt. Bo sure t.hnt dx is the differential o a function of the state of t.ho system fnr nnlv in that case is it proper to write a partial derivative like (Ax/thi).— Thus in particular we cannot TDroceed in fhi yray with nvpaomna fn- AW or.d JG tfrffllgh Sliperfieifl.llV t.hov look 

1 For the method of classifying thermodynamic formulas presented in Secs. 4 and 5, see P. W. Bridgman, A Condensed Collection of Thermodynamic Formulas, Harvard University Press. 

---

To circumvent the above problems with mass action schemes, it is necessary to use a more general thermodynamic formalism based on parameters known as interaction coefficients, also called Donnan coefficients in some contexts (Record et al, 1998). This approach is completely general it requires no assumptions about the types of interactions the ions may make with the RNA or the kinds of environments the ions may occupy. Although interaction parameters are a fundamental concept in thermodynamics and have been widely applied to biophysical problems, the literature on this topic can be difficult to access for anyone not already familiar with the formalism, and the application of interaction coefficients to the mixed monovalent-divalent cation solutions commonly used for RNA studies has received only limited attention (Grilley et al, 2006 Misra and Draper, 1999). For these reasons, the following theory section sets out the main concepts of the preferential interaction formalism in some detail, and outlines derivations of formulas relevant to monovalent ion-RNA interactions. Section 3 presents example analyses of experimental data, and extends the preferential interaction formalism to solutions of mixed salts (i.e., KC1 and MgCl2). The section includes discussions of potential sources of error and practical considerations in data analysis for experiments with both mono- and divalent ions. 

In any case, even with much more complicated systems, the work done1 will have an analogous form for Eq. (1.1) is simply a force (P) times a displacement (rfF), and we know that work can always be put in such a form. If there is occasion to set up the thermodynamic formulas for a more general type of force than a pressure, we simply set up dW in a form corresponding to Eq. (1.1), and proceed by analogy with the derivations which we shall give here. 

The Elementary Partial Derivatives.—We can set up a number of familiar partial derivatives and thermodynamic formulas, from the information which we already have. We have five variables, of which any two are independent, the rest dependent. We can then set up the partial derivative of any dependent variable with respect to any independent variable, keeping the other independent variable constant. A notation is necessary showing in each case what are the two independent variables. This is a need not ordinarily appreciated in mathematical treatments of partial differentiation, for there the independent variables are usually determined in advance and described in words, so that there is no ambiguity about them. Thus, a notation, peculiar to thermodynamics, has been adopted. In any partial derivative, it is obvious that the quantity being differentiated is one of the dependent variables, and the quantity with respect to which it is differentiated is one of the independent variables. It is only necessary to specify the other independent variable, the one which is held constant in the differentiation, and the convention is to indicate this by a subscript. Thus (dS/dT)P, which is ordinarily read as the partial of S with respect to T at constant P, is the derivative of S in which pressure and temperature are independent variables. This derivative would mean an entirely different thing from the derivative of S with respect to T at constant V, for instance. 

The present author believes that many practical problems can be illuminated and even solved with the use Monte Carlo simulations like those presented above in this section. The simulations are inherently probabilistic and can incorporate both thermodynamic and kinetic factors. The simulations do not provide formulae, but their great advantage is the possibility to take into account real experimental conditions. Simulations do not take any significant time, even on standard PC workstations. On the other hand, deriving analytical formulae as a rule requires assuming idealized experimental conditions, which are often far from reality. 

In the first half of this part, the statistical thermodynamics of gases at moderate densities is reviewed and necessary formulas are derived. These formulas are combined, in the second half, with our model of the intermolecular potential to explain the compressibility data of gases. 

In order to calculate AGciay or AGsoln (Eq. [8] and [9]) with the free energy perturbation technique, it is necessary to compute and sum the relative free energy differences between adjacent mutation steps. A procedure that can be used for this purpose is readily derived from standard statistical thermodynamic formulae. 

The extent of dissociation given in the first column of the above table as obs. is derived from this figure that given under " calc. results from the above thermodynamical formula, and leads to the value... 

After including variational and quantum effects, the quasithermodynamic variables of TST, like entropy of activation and energy of activation, may be decomposed into substantial contributions that derive from formulas analogous to those of statistical thermodynamics [36] and nonsubstantiaT contributions deriving from the transmission coefficient [37]. 

The simple treatment of rubber elasticity given above makes two assumptions, which require further consideration. First, it has been assumed that the internal energy contribution is negligible, which implies that different molecular conformations of the chains have identical internal energies. Secondly, the thermodynamic formulae that have been derived are, strictly, only applicable to measurements at constant volume, whereas most experimental results are obtained at a known pressure. These two assumptions are interrelated in the sense that the experimental work of Gee (see Section 4.2.1) based on the approximation... 

Sect. 2.10.5 for further details). For Kn < 0.01 the medium can be considered as a continuum and the fluid dynamic transport equations are valid. In the case of liquids, the break-down of the continuum hypothesis manifests in anomalous diffusion mechanisms [64]. Moreover, the local equilibrium assumption implies that the thermodynamic formulas derived from classical equilibrium thermodynamics may be applied locally for nonequilibrium systems [13, 88, 89]. When this is done, we have established a fluid dynamic continuum theory in which all intensive thermodynamic variables like T, p become functions of position r and time t thus T(t, r), pit, r) [88, 89]. The extensive variables like S, H are replaced by mass specific variables that also become functions of position r and time t thus s(t, r), h(t, r). 

This is analogous to the situation concerning the fundamental thermodynamic formula dU = TdS + pdy, which, although derived by considering a reversible process, is valid for irreversible processes as well. 

Then derive the standard thermodynamic formula for the entropy of mixing for an ideal gas mixture. 

By the standard methods of statistical thermodynamics it is possible to derive for certain entropy changes general formulas that cannot be derived from the zeroth, first, and second laws of classical thermodynamics. In particular one can obtain formulae for entropy changes in highly di.sperse systems, for those in very cold systems, and for those associated, with the mixing ofvery similar substances. 

Flemeon is the first standard reference book that presents the equations for calculating thermal updrafts. These equations are repeated and expanded in other standard reference books, including Heinsohn, Goodfellow, and the ACGIFl Industrial Ventilation Manual.These equations are derived from the more accurate formulas for heat transfer (Nusselt number) at natural convection (where density differences, due to temperature differences, provide the body force required to move the fluid) and both the detailed and the simplified formulas can be found in handbooks on thermodynamics (e.g., Perry--, and ASHRAE -). 

This important formula, which can be derived more formally from the laws of thermodynamics, applies when any change takes place at constant pressure and temperature. Notice that, for a given enthalpy change of the system (that is, a given output of heat), the entropy of the surroundings increases more if their temperature is low than if it is high (Fig. 7.16). The explanation is the sneeze in the street analogy mentioned in Section 7.2. Because AH is independent of path, Eq. 10 is applicable whether the process occurs reversibly or irreversibly. 

Continuum models have a long and honorable tradition in solvation modeling they ultimately have their roots in the classical formulas of Mossotti (1850), Clausius (1879), Lorentz (1880), and Lorenz (1881), based on the polarization fields in condensed media [32, 57], Chemical thermodynamics is based on free energies [58], and the modem theory of free energies in solution is traceable to Bom s derivation (1920) of the electrostatic free energy of insertion of a monatomic ion in a continuum dielectric [59], and Kirkwood and Onsager s... 

---